Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 14 Jan 2010 (Thursday) 18:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Whats everyones feelings like about listing lots of gear in sigs?

 
this thread is locked
focus.pocus
Goldmember
Avatar
3,423 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Geneva Switzerland / South Carolina U.S.A.
     
Jan 18, 2010 16:58 |  #136

I think it's a bit of showing off... Photographers on this site have very big egos I have noticed... I think they should be listed on your profile page only... no one really cares what you have... If I want to know what lens you used to take a photo I will ask... if you list 10 lens in your sig I still have to ask which one was used... it's just an ego thing in my opinion...


I know, right? I'm just sayin'...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Quizzical_Squirrel
Senior Member
489 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jan 18, 2010 17:08 |  #137

I often wonder why people go to the trouble to detail their gear but don't give a link to their photographs.

I'm a beginner and often diligently copy down someone's words of wisdom in my wee notebook and am then a little disappointed I can't see the theory in action.

I should add that I haven't done either because:

a) I'm only starting out so don't feel my list would be of much interest and god forbid someone were to ask me something about an item I own because I would probably struggle to formulate an opinion that would be of any use whatsoever

and

b) I'm horribly embarrassed about how poor my photos are compared to everyone elses! :oops:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_r
Cream of the Proverbial Crop
Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006
Avatar
18,065 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2003
Location: The middle of the UK
     
Jan 18, 2010 17:10 |  #138

Quizzical_Squirrel wrote in post #9420449 (external link)
I often wonder why people go to the trouble to detail their gear but don't give a link to their photographs.

An excellent point!

(N.B. Both of my sites are listed before my gear ;-)a )


Neil - © NHR Photography
Commercial Site (external link) - Video Site (external link) - Blog - (external link)Gear List There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bear ­ Dale
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,868 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Jan 18, 2010 17:13 |  #139

PMCphotography wrote in post #9416721 (external link)
There's an entire subforum and a lens sample archive. If you wanted to see and know about someones opinion, you could always look there... AND see photos taken with the lens you were interested in. I've done it before...

And there is a forum option to not view posters signatures.


Cheers,
Bear Dale

Some of my photos featured on Flickr Bear Dale (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bear ­ Dale
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,868 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Jan 18, 2010 17:20 |  #140

focus.pocus wrote in post #9420375 (external link)
... no one really cares what you have...

Why don't you write "I" don't really care what you have? Why try to get more credence by pretending to speak for others?

Lots of people in this thread have stated in this thread, there for all to read, that they appreciate and like reading other posters gear lists.

it's just an ego thing in my opinion

Hmm and posting a link to your images isn't ...............


Cheers,
Bear Dale

Some of my photos featured on Flickr Bear Dale (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PMCphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
     
Jan 18, 2010 17:40 |  #141

ConDigital wrote in post #9420479 (external link)
And there is a forum option to not view posters signatures.

But then links to their photos/sites/flickr/et​c wouldn't be visible.


Twitter (external link)
Hobart Wedding Photography (external link)
I have some camera stuff. Here it is.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PMCphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
     
Jan 18, 2010 17:44 |  #142

ConDigital wrote in post #9420526 (external link)
Hmm and posting a link to your images isn't ...............

No, it isn't. If someone posted their pics in their signature, then maybe. But offering samples of their work taken with their gear is another thing entirely. Since we all know (or should know) that fancy gear does not equal good photos, those posters who show off all their fancy gear but don't take good photos is not credible, and should focus on the fundamentals, not L lenses.


Twitter (external link)
Hobart Wedding Photography (external link)
I have some camera stuff. Here it is.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gedanken
Senior Member
741 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jan 18, 2010 17:46 |  #143

PMCphotography wrote in post #9420695 (external link)
those posters who show off all their fancy gear but don't take good photos is not credible, and should focus on the fundamentals, not L lenses.

How does that affect your photography?


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bear ­ Dale
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,868 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Jan 18, 2010 17:53 |  #144

PMCphotography wrote in post #9420695 (external link)
No, it isn't. If someone posted their pics in their signature, then maybe. But offering samples of their work taken with their gear is another thing entirely. Since we all know (or should know) that fancy gear does not equal good photos, those posters who show off all their fancy gear but don't take good photos is not credible, and should focus on the fundamentals, not L lenses.

Why so judgemental? Seems the anti's are the ones that get their knickers in a knot. Why or how does it affect you so much?

I also think you're dreaming if you truly believe that posting images isn't ego driven.


Cheers,
Bear Dale

Some of my photos featured on Flickr Bear Dale (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Absolutely ­ Fabulous
Goldmember
1,699 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jan 18, 2010 18:24 |  #145

ConDigital wrote in post #9420779 (external link)
I also think you're dreaming if you truly believe that posting images isn't ego driven.

of course it is! we all like to hear nice comments it is encouraging, hence the large number of threads in the photo sharing section


http://www.belovedlove​photography.com (external link)my website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
H20boy
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Ft. Worth, TX - USA
     
Jan 18, 2010 18:29 |  #146

I'm for signatures... for any number of arguments above. Sure, some have more in their sig, but its more helpful than harmful. It does bite to keep asking what at poster has already for gear, and to be honest, they don't often like to type it up every time they are asking for technical help and gear advice.

Pro-sigs


Matt l My Galleries (external link)
5d2 l 1d3 l 24-70/2.8 l Σ 50/1.4 l 70-200/2.8 IS l Σ 120-300/2.8 l 135/2 l 15/2.8 FE l Tam 90mac

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Absolutely ­ Fabulous
Goldmember
1,699 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jan 18, 2010 18:32 as a reply to  @ H20boy's post |  #147

I advice people who hate siggys to not join baby forums, OMG they have these huge pics of their kids and it drives me nuts, takes 5 pages to list 3 posts they are so long :p


http://www.belovedlove​photography.com (external link)my website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Jan 18, 2010 18:32 |  #148

I've gone back and forth between having the list in my signature and not. In the end, it doesn't get me any more business and so there's no reason to do it that benefits me. If I do show the list, it may tell people that I know about such and such piece of equipment.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Randi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,106 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO.
     
Jan 18, 2010 18:47 |  #149

Absolutely Fabulous wrote in post #9420996 (external link)
of course it is! we all like to hear nice comments it is encouraging, hence the large number of threads in the photo sharing section

I think that a lot of people do it for critique though, also... some of us are here to learn and improve and know that we're not going to be told how awesome our images are when they're not. I want to be told what's wrong with my pictures so I can fix them. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Absolutely ­ Fabulous
Goldmember
1,699 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jan 18, 2010 18:55 |  #150

Randi wrote in post #9421148 (external link)
I think that a lot of people do it for critique though, also... some of us are here to learn and improve and know that we're not going to be told how awesome our images are when they're not. I want to be told what's wrong with my pictures so I can fix them. :)

I sure how your hoping for positive comments too though ;)

I was trying to stress the pos vs the neg there


http://www.belovedlove​photography.com (external link)my website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,749 views & 0 likes for this thread, 67 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Whats everyones feelings like about listing lots of gear in sigs?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1843 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.