Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 23 Jun 2005 (Thursday) 00:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Costco Printing

 
22littlereasons
Senior Member
321 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Canada
     
Jun 23, 2005 00:07 |  #1

I've been using costco for the past year and have been pretty happy. I'm probably there once or twice a week getting prints done for different clients - usually 8x12's.

So, I'm visiting a Black's photography (Canadian franchise). They just upgraded their facilty here locally to be more digital friendly. I ask them about their pricing because it's 30% to 40% more for print processing than costco.

When I ask why it's more dough... they tell me costco's fujinon printing process is about one level up from using an inkjet printer... basically their claim is costco prints will be faded within years.... non-extistent within a decade!!

So, is this true? Can anyone shed some light on this?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andygrif
Senior Member
334 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Northampton, UK
     
Jun 23, 2005 02:53 |  #2

I don't know about the fading issue, personally I think it's unlikely. I've had film prints from Costco for several years and not had a problem, I assume digital is the same print process.

I get most of my everyday printing done at Costco, it's cheaper than using an inkjet but for something special I would use a speciallist lab.

Sounds like sour grapes to me, but I'm not a printing expert so I might be VERY wrong!!


EOS300d, Battery Grip, EF-S18-55, 70-200/4L, 75-300, 50/1.8, 24-70 DGEX Macro, EX550, Slik 88, EX150 Studio Flash, MiniTrekker

They say money doesn't bring happiness - but at least let me prove it - Spike Milligan

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Jun 23, 2005 06:30 |  #3

I might be wrong but doesn't Fuji make the Frontier series printer???
I think the Frontier prints on photo emulsion paper, same as film prints, and they have been time tested. So the guy at Black's is blow clouds up your where the sun don't shine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 23, 2005 09:56 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

And which inkjet prints was he referring to? Certain new inks now are rated at 100-200 years. Sounds like he told you something to try and justify their higher prices. Anything you buy from a camera/photo store is going to be a lot higher than if bought at a discount store.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ElleG83
Member
Avatar
149 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: San Marcos, TX
     
Jun 23, 2005 10:03 |  #5

i think he's full of BS. i talked to one of my professors who specializes in printing and he told me that the prints at costco would last a lot longer than a decade, probably more like a century, and for sure wouldnt fade in a couple of years. he uses costco himself.


Canon EOS 20D :-D
75-300mm
35-80mm
17-40L
50mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Jun 23, 2005 10:10 as a reply to  @ ElleG83's post |  #6

ElleG83 wrote:
i think he's full of BS. i talked to one of my professors who specializes in printing and he told me that the prints at costco would last a lot longer than a decade, probably more like a century, and for sure wouldnt fade in a couple of years. he uses costco himself.

Good to hear that pros are not too proud to admit that they have their prints done in Costco.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
22littlereasons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
321 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Canada
     
Jun 24, 2005 07:43 |  #7

Just as I thought... the salesguy was full of it. *s*




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grego
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,819 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: UCLA
     
Jul 09, 2005 01:19 |  #8

I use Costco. They print on high quality paper. It's not like cheap piece of crap.

And from what I have heard, there printers are made by Fuji.


Go UCLA (external link)!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.com (external link)SportsShooter (external link)|Flickr (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CanonLaw
Senior Member
Avatar
633 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Tacoma
     
Jul 09, 2005 21:59 as a reply to  @ grego's post |  #9

I have tried MANY different places to get my prints done. Costco, Wal-Mart, Fred-Meyer, Rite-Aide Kits (or Ritz) Cameras.....by far Costco seems to do the best job.
Pictures at places like wal-mart and fred meyer seem to be done on cheap paper that warps in a frame. Ritz, which is supposedly a "PHOTO STORE" wanted $9 for an 8x10, and costco does it for $2. I asked the guy at Ritz and he said it was more expensive because the quality is so much better, which is crap. I have printed there three or four times before discovering costco and the prints never looked that good and they were always inconsistant as far as colors go...sometimes they would be washed out, other times too dark...dont ask me how they managed to do that.

Anyways, those are my thoughts....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TonyKInTexas
Senior Member
Avatar
308 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Oct 2002
Location: East Tennessee, USA
     
Jul 10, 2005 07:23 as a reply to  @ CanonLaw's post |  #10

I ran a test some years back against CostCo, the local camera shop and one other place (can't remember now). CostCo beat everyone then. Now I have WHCC and another pro shop I can use and I find myself using CostCo still. Great pricess, good, quality product and ease of use are the reasons.

Take care,


Tony
Canon 7D, Canon 24-105 F4L IS and other goodies.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SWPhotoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
3,231 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: No. Calif.
     
Jul 30, 2005 16:31 |  #11

I just picked up four 12x18 digital enlargements from my neighborhood Costco, and I must say, they are excellent.

I used two images, shot at full-resolution (6.3Mp) with my 10D, cleaned up and fine tuned in PSCS2, then I saved the TIFF files and then made two duplicates of each.

The first of each shot I converted to 8bit, JPG, changed color space to sRBG, and saved at max resolution, size 12 JPG.

The second I did the same thing, but used view proof setup, changed it to the custon ICC profile supplied by DryCreek Photo for my local Costco's Noritsu printer, and saved it with the applied profile (no ICC profile embedded, the Noritsu can't read it).

Both sets of images were uploaded separately, as two orders, to my local Costco Photo dept., and "lustre" paper was selected, as was "no enhancement".

The plain old JPG files came out beautifully, and if I did not have the other two with the custom ICC profile applied to compare against, I would say they were perfect.
The ones using the costom profile for the Noritsu are fantastic. I don't think I'll ever waste paper, ink and time printing anything bigger than 8.5x11 on my i9100 again. I can't see any difference between the Costco "best" prints and the same image created on my Canon i9100 on Ilford Gallerie Classic Pearl (with appropriate custom ICC profile), which is my "benchmark" combination.

I would highly recommend following the workflow described on DryCreek Photo's site, and using Costco for hardcopy, at least up to 12x18.

Just my $.02


SWPhoto-Imaging

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toddb
Senior Member
Avatar
792 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Seattle Washington
     
Jul 30, 2005 17:50 |  #12

I don't get Costco print that much any more. It's ok, but for the price different, I think MPix.com is a whole lot better. Everytime I ever tried using the luster paper at Costco they were just dim looking compared to the glossy...and the glossy paper was so smooth that it stuck to the glass (maybe my apartment has too much humitity. Costco is alright though, I wouldn't think twice about getting prints to family since they probably wouldn't tell the difference.

The std paper at Mpix is more like the luster texture...but it's as bright and colorful as the glossy at costco and the color do seems richer. I was a huge fan of Costco prints until I got some prints from MPix. I do think for the price, it's hard to beat Costco tough. Oh, and as far as being better then inkjet prints, by far Costco is way better. I have a problem with "nicking" my inkjet prints and the ink just scraps right off...I know when I print on the inkjet it won't be around too long unless it gets framed right away.

So Costco is great, but mpix is worth the extra cost especially if you don't client work I think.


10D, EF17-40L, EF50F1.4, EF28-135IS, 550EX [AlienBees 2xB800 and 1xB400 with large softbox and reversible umbrella] Sekonic L-358

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdmedicgod
Senior Member
498 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Salisbury, MD
     
Jul 30, 2005 18:13 as a reply to  @ CanonLaw's post |  #13

CanonLaw wrote:
I Ritz, which is supposedly a "PHOTO STORE" wanted $9 for an 8x10, and costco does it for $2. I asked the guy at Ritz and he said it was more expensive because the quality is so much better, which is crap. I have printed there three or four times before discovering costco and the prints never looked that good and they were always inconsistant as far as colors go...sometimes they would be washed out, other times too dark...dont ask me how they managed to do that.

Anyways, those are my thoughts....

Sounds like your Ritz is ripping you off! Ritz published price for 8x10 is $4.99! Never had a print issue at my local ritz.


Canon 1D Mark II
Canon 20D
Canon 300D
Canon 70-200 F2.8L IS
Canon 24-70 F2.8 L
Canon 50mm F 1.8
Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG
2 kit lenses MKI and MKII
http://www.fithp.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ATucker
Member
178 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
     
Jul 30, 2005 18:25 as a reply to  @ mdmedicgod's post |  #14

I second SWPhotos comments regarding use of Dry Creek Photos's profiles with Costco Noritsu printers and following Dry Creek Photos printing instructions.

www.drycreekphoto.com (external link)

Costco uses Fuji Crystal paper.


Tom
Panoholic (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SWPhotoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
3,231 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: No. Calif.
     
Jul 31, 2005 17:39 as a reply to  @ ATucker's post |  #15

And then there is speed!
Today, at about 1:30pm my time (on a Sunday), I uploaded three 11x14 images to Costco for printing.

Within seconds, I got the usual automated e-mail saying my prints would be ready the next day (8/1-Monday) at 2pm.

24 minutes later, I got a second e-mail, saying my prints were finished and ready for pickup.

That's way less than 1-hr service, on a custom enlargement order.

They came out great, too.


SWPhoto-Imaging

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

17,606 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
Costco Printing
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
660 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.