Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 17 Jan 2010 (Sunday) 16:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-200f4L IS vs 70-200f2.8L

 
crowflyawa
Senior Member
458 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Jan 18, 2010 23:53 |  #61
bannedPermanent ban

Well that's a bit mis leading and a bit wrong.

I should post the specifics per camera model but don’t have time to go get the pdf manual for each body and
turn to the AF section and read the insert about 2.8 lenses.
Read this yourself in the manual for a 1D MKIII and a 5D and a 7D and a 40D and a Rebel.

Each Body have different specs on how they react to a f/2.8 and f/5.6 and f/8 lenses
and on some of the bodies it make almost no diff at all.


Use a real F/4 lens and use a real F/2.8 lens to compare AF!
The TC's introduce a whole set of AF problems completely unrelated to f stop that will show a slowdown and accuracy loss of AF.
The full Accuracy gain of a 2.8 lens isn’t even really realized until on a 1D body anyhow.
The non 1D body’s usually only increase AF on a 2.8 lens for the Center AF point only.
The 1D body’s have increased AF accuracy on many many more AF points.
The new 7D has increased AF accuracy in middle between a 5D and 1D since it has a few more triple sensitive AF points like the 1D has, but not as many.

-Steve




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Jan 19, 2010 08:06 |  #62

More technical than my needs :( .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dr.Pete
Senior Member
984 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jan 19, 2010 08:17 |  #63

crowflyawa wrote in post #9422469 (external link)
Emitted light is absorbed by a cmos very very fast, point it at a light bulb or the sun and see. That's why your tests are not helpful for Reflected light photos.

Are you implying that there's something inherently different about reflected photons vs emitted photons to a CMOS?

Just to throw it out there--it might be just that a light bulb or the sun is causing more light to hit the CMOS than the amount of light reflected off a surface. Don't believe me? Try your sunlight/light bulb test in a nice mirror.


Tools of the dark side | MacBook Pro/LR3/Photoshop CS5
“Gear Is Good, Vision Is Better.” -- David duChemin

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackhawk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: East coast for now
     
Jan 19, 2010 08:44 |  #64

Dr.Pete wrote in post #9424741 (external link)
Are you implying that there's something inherently different about reflected photons vs emitted photons to a CMOS?

Just to throw it out there--it might be just that a light bulb or the sun is causing more light to hit the CMOS than the amount of light reflected off a surface. Don't believe me? Try your sunlight/light bulb test in a nice mirror.

The light is polarized coming off the LCD too... not the best source.


You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dr.Pete
Senior Member
984 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jan 19, 2010 09:16 |  #65

blackhawk wrote in post #9424870 (external link)
The light is polarized coming off the LCD too... not the best source.

I was assuming nobody was using a polarizer... :)


Tools of the dark side | MacBook Pro/LR3/Photoshop CS5
“Gear Is Good, Vision Is Better.” -- David duChemin

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
UberMember
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jan 19, 2010 14:33 |  #66
bannedPermanent ban
SPAM PUT AWAY
This post is marked as spam.
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,927 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
70-200f4L IS vs 70-200f2.8L
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1107 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.