Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 19 Jan 2010 (Tuesday) 23:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Trivia/Maths Q. - Circumference of the Earth

 
legoman_iac
Senior Member
308 posts
Likes: 50
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
     
Jan 19, 2010 23:28 |  #1

This is another 'off-topic topic', but a fun one to share with fellow star gazes ... (although it does bring back the horrors of 7th grade math)

Q. If I had a string which went around the equator of the Earth so it was snug and I added 1 metre to its length, so it raised itself off the ground/sea, how far would it be from it's original position (ie. what is the increase in radius)?


2x 50d: with 17-85mm f4-5.6, 100mm Macro USM, 50mm f1.8, 2x Sigma 30mm f1.4, 55-250mm (kit lens), Canon 100-400mm L, Tamron 200-400mm f5.6, Samyang 8mm. 480mm refactor with HEQ5. Home made beamsplitter stereo rig.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aaagogo
Goldmember
Avatar
2,403 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
     
Jan 20, 2010 00:42 |  #2

Radius of Earth in meters - (((2 * Pi * Radius of Earth in meters) + 1 meter ) / 2 * Pi )


https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=4655753&pos​tcount=953 Your 1st 10,000 images are your worst
One photo out of focus is a mistake, ten photo out of focus are an experimentation, one hundred photo out of focus are a style

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
legoman_iac
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
308 posts
Likes: 50
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
     
Jan 20, 2010 02:36 |  #3

Well ... OK, but in terms of mm's which is what spun me out. New radius is bigger by approx 159mm!


2x 50d: with 17-85mm f4-5.6, 100mm Macro USM, 50mm f1.8, 2x Sigma 30mm f1.4, 55-250mm (kit lens), Canon 100-400mm L, Tamron 200-400mm f5.6, Samyang 8mm. 480mm refactor with HEQ5. Home made beamsplitter stereo rig.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adrena1in
Goldmember
1,703 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK.
     
Jan 20, 2010 04:44 |  #4

Reminds me of something I heard the other day about a nerd who calculated Pi to several trillion decimal places.

I was quite surprised that you only need to know Pi to 9 decimal places in order to calculate the circumference of a circle the size of the earth to an accuracy of +/- 1mm. 47 decimal places of Pi is enough to calculate the circumference of the known universe to an accuracy of +/- the width of a hydrogen atom.

So why calculate Pi to trillions of decimal places?!

(When I was at school, me and some friends memorised Pi to about 150 decimal places, and to this day I still know about 40 or 50, so I'm sorted should someone ask me to do a major culculation! ;) )


Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris.bailey
Goldmember
2,061 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
     
Jan 20, 2010 06:09 |  #5

Yeah that is a little surprising especially when after the Xmas indulgences loosening my belt by an inch does not seem to have made that much difference :-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Catanonia
Senior Member
968 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: UK
     
Jan 20, 2010 13:20 |  #6

Adrena1in wrote in post #9431790 (external link)
Reminds me of something I heard the other day about a nerd who calculated Pi to several trillion decimal places.

I was quite surprised that you only need to know Pi to 9 decimal places in order to calculate the circumference of a circle the size of the earth to an accuracy of +/- 1mm. 47 decimal places of Pi is enough to calculate the circumference of the known universe to an accuracy of +/- the width of a hydrogen atom.

So why calculate Pi to trillions of decimal places?!

(When I was at school, me and some friends memorised Pi to about 150 decimal places, and to this day I still know about 40 or 50, so I'm sorted should someone ask me to do a major culculation! ;) )

nerd..... ;)


MY NEW WEBSITE : www.portrait-universe.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
legoman_iac
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
308 posts
Likes: 50
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
     
Jan 20, 2010 17:04 |  #7

Well, obviously we need pi to at least 94 decimal places so we can calculate our known universe and the parallel one next to use, like in Futurama.

Chris, you mean to tell me after December celebrations you gained 4.04mm of insualtion from eating (1inch/2*pi)??? You sure it wasn't just your winter coating?

What I like about the Earth question is you tell someone who doesn't actually think about it (aka nerdn'ts) and then ask them the same question but instead of the Earth, use a golf ball as an example and it's the same answer! They struggle with the concept, it's fun to watch!


2x 50d: with 17-85mm f4-5.6, 100mm Macro USM, 50mm f1.8, 2x Sigma 30mm f1.4, 55-250mm (kit lens), Canon 100-400mm L, Tamron 200-400mm f5.6, Samyang 8mm. 480mm refactor with HEQ5. Home made beamsplitter stereo rig.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Adrena1in
Goldmember
1,703 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Winchester, Hampshire, UK.
     
Jan 21, 2010 16:31 |  #8

legoman_iac wrote in post #9435605 (external link)
What I like about the Earth question is you tell someone who doesn't actually think about it (aka nerdn'ts) and then ask them the same question but instead of the Earth, use a golf ball as an example and it's the same answer! They struggle with the concept, it's fun to watch!

So therefore the answer would be the same for a piece of string wrapped right round the circle of the known universe?! That is pretty mind-bending!


Talking of the earth, did you know that relatively speaking it's as smooth as a pool ball?

And if it really was as smooth as a pool ball, it would be covered all over by a 2-mile deep sea.


Canon EOS 450D, Sigma 18-200mm, Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 2x TC, Revelation 12" f/5 Dobsonian, Mintron PD2285-EX webcam.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
legoman_iac
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
308 posts
Likes: 50
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
     
Jan 21, 2010 17:49 |  #9

Well, obviously know one knows for sure as there isn't a piece of string long enough to go around both universes!

Pool balls aren't smooth? Well, not in any of the pubs I've been to lately! But interesting to know, so Waterworld could come true some day! Shotgun gills!!!


2x 50d: with 17-85mm f4-5.6, 100mm Macro USM, 50mm f1.8, 2x Sigma 30mm f1.4, 55-250mm (kit lens), Canon 100-400mm L, Tamron 200-400mm f5.6, Samyang 8mm. 480mm refactor with HEQ5. Home made beamsplitter stereo rig.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,543 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Trivia/Maths Q. - Circumference of the Earth
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1059 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.