toffiloff wrote in post #9439000
Of course it sounds nice, but is this data collected from real-usage or just some ideal/theoretical situation?
And even though the protocol supports it, will my MacBook Pro (late mid level 2008 model) be able to keep up with it?
In actual tests, esata easily beats FW800, especially in simultaneous read/write operations. Supports NCQ and actually can max out most ssds as well, so it is well worth it. The other good thing is that with an FIS switch and a few disks on esata, you can actually enable RAID (1, 0, 5 usually) and get higher performance and size. If your macbook supports expresscard, then you can get esata for it.
As for brand, I have all WD drives after my seagate decided to just die out of the blue. I have had one drive out of about half a dozen fail, but it still reads perfectly, just can't write to it.
I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List