You would use the 134 Ws output with a high-speed head to give you an incredibly fast flash.
I think !!!
Austen.
Or to give you an even lower power setting than you could hope for.

alexanderGARDNER Goldmember 3,540 posts Likes: 8 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Feb 24, 2010 02:56 | #3151 charlieharper wrote in post #9671264 You would use the 134 Ws output with a high-speed head to give you an incredibly fast flash. I think !!! Austen. Or to give you an even lower power setting than you could hope for. ALEXANDER GARDNER
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rai33 Goldmember 1,838 posts Likes: 18 Joined Jan 2009 Location: Sydney More info | Feb 24, 2010 03:01 | #3152 Austen - straight from the Quadra manual: Portfolio - Fashion/Beauty
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mickeyjuice THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 7,876 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Feb 24, 2010 03:12 | #3153 Permanent banRai33 wrote in post #9671316 Mic/Al... get those credit cards ready. Tell 'em I said if you were in Sydney Suresh from Kayell would have looked after you ; - ) I don't think I have to worry too much cheers, juice (Canon shooter, Elinchrom lighter, but pretty much agnostic on brands.)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
verty Goldmember 1,459 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: London, United Kingdom More info | Feb 24, 2010 03:22 | #3154 hello fellow aussie POTNers. 5D Mark II || 550 D || 350 D || Canon 17-40L || Canon 24-70L || Canon 50 1.4 || Canon 70-200L IS 2.8 || 580 EX Speedlight || 480 EX speedlight x2 || Manfrotto 190CXPro3 + 488 RC2 || Cybersyncs
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheMoose Cream of the Crop 5,106 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2009 More info | Feb 24, 2010 03:35 | #3155 verty wrote in post #9671350 hello fellow aussie POTNers. im selling some camera gear, check out my thread. if you are interested just PM me. Thanx https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=831234 Nice prices. I'd be all over the Sigma 10-20 if I had an APS-C camera
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BOSS Gone, but not forgotten 2,610 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2007 Location: QLD,Australia More info | Feb 24, 2010 03:47 | #3156 Permanent banDigitalDabbler wrote in post #9671181 Since the topic refers to Einstein - any physics people here? I was reading an article in NewScientist and it got me thinking. E=mc^2 Suppose that c isn't the limit but that E is. This wouldn't change the speed of light, but would allow lighter objects to travel faster. Could this allow for such things as quantum entanglement, without breaking Relativity? My thinking is thus. At the moment of the big bang the most energetic level any particle would be capable of would be E. E=mc^2, so the speed of light would be governed by c= (Em)^-2. Thus, quarks, bosons. et al, being lighter, would be capable of super c velocities. Would, could, this explain "spooky interaction at a distance"? Allowing for entropy, could this conflict with the current belief that the universe is expanding faster than we postulated? After all, the speed of the galaxies we see expanding is measured based on an earlier, faster c. Perhaps this may explain why we can't find all that dark matter. C:\> Interesting hypothesis which now has the question....Does dark matter really exist? John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alexanderGARDNER Goldmember 3,540 posts Likes: 8 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Feb 24, 2010 03:52 | #3157 The Moose wrote in post #9671374 Nice prices. I'd be all over the Sigma 10-20 if I had an APS-C camera ![]() It works down to 12.5mm! ALEXANDER GARDNER
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ed. Goldmember 2,978 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: 2114.syd.nsw.au More info | Feb 24, 2010 04:26 | #3158 be interesting to see what you think of them. http://www.edwardhor.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mickeyjuice THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 7,876 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Feb 24, 2010 04:42 | #3159 Permanent baned. wrote in post #9671466 be interesting to see what you think of them. they are INCREDIBLY small and light. Yeah, I'm interested too. But I still don't think they'll work for me, or that I can afford them. cheers, juice (Canon shooter, Elinchrom lighter, but pretty much agnostic on brands.)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustinLawrence Goldmember 2,497 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2008 Location: SYdney, AUstralia More info | Feb 24, 2010 04:53 | #3160 Rai33 wrote in post #9671316 Austen - straight from the Quadra manual: The system offers two Ranger Quadra Heads with LED Pilotlight: • The S Head is designed for universal photography equipped with a standard omega plug-in flashtube • The A Head offers a very short flash duration for action freezing photography. The new A tube is a single twin pole plug-in flash tube also with even light distribution Ranger Quadra offer a 66% for outlet A and 33% for outlet B (2:1) asymmetrical light distribution with two connected RQ Heads. 66% for outlet A and 33% for outlet B Outlet A: 25 ws – 400 ws (one connected RQ Head) - gives maximum power Outlet B: 8.2 ws – 132 ws (one connected RQ Head) – gives shortest flash durations Outlet A & B: 66% A, 34% B for asymmetric light distribution of power 25 ws – 400 ws ...ps you can download the manuals from Elinchrom's website which also shows you how feature rich they are. Mic/Al... get those credit cards ready. Tell 'em I said if you were in Sydney Suresh from Kayell would have looked after you ; - ) Cool, i see why they are calling the two ports asymmetrical now, though makes me think even more that the best/most versatile option would be to have 1 pack per head. Justin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mickeyjuice THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 7,876 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Feb 24, 2010 04:58 | #3161 Permanent banJustinLawrence wrote in post #9671546 Cool, i see why they are calling the two ports asymmetrical now, though makes me think even more that the best/most versatile option would be to have 1 pack per head. Yeah, which makes them whacky expensive. cheers, juice (Canon shooter, Elinchrom lighter, but pretty much agnostic on brands.)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
photobitz PlatinumMeasurebaiter 6,501 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: NSW, Australia More info | Feb 24, 2010 07:24 | #3162 Good Lord! Are you lot still going on about lighting?!?!? Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DAdeGroot Goldmember 4,512 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Cedar Creek, Qld, Australia More info | Feb 24, 2010 07:46 | #3163 DigitalDabbler wrote in post #9671181 My thinking is thus. At the moment of the big bang the most energetic level any particle would be capable of would be E. E=mc^2, so the speed of light would be governed by c= (Em)^-2. shouldn't that be c=(E/m)^-2 Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
charlieharper Goldmember 1,583 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Australia More info | Feb 24, 2010 07:51 | #3164 DAdeGroot wrote in post #9672107 shouldn't that be c=(E/m)^-2 Only where K^c¾√3 < 1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
charlieharper Goldmember 1,583 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Australia More info | Feb 24, 2010 08:53 | #3165 Nighty night all ...........
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1833 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||