POTN Aussie Club #8 - Einsteins won't make you smart

mickeyjuice wrote in post #10452617
We'll get a group together, it's a brilliant piece of Melbourne.

Up to 90+ designs seen so far. Some are re-works, of course.

http://99designs.com …hotography-business-47593

Got a couple of favourites so far, with a couple still being worked on.

Is '99designs' just the name of their site or is each project limited to 99 entries? Definitely a few good ones in there now. Will be tough to decide in the end, but it looks like the logo will provide a good base for the brand

The Moose wrote in post #10452740
Is '99designs' just the name of their site or is each project limited to 99 entries? Definitely a few good ones in there now. Will be tough to decide in the end, but it looks like the logo will provide a good base for the brand

Nah, just the name. Besides, I've eliminated a heap

12 entries left and four with a five star rating,should make it a bit easier for you juice.

@Mic - for me #46 still looks the most professional, serious and less like my daughter drew a lime Maybe just the first J should look more like a "J" than an "I".

Design #44 is my pick from the bunch left for consideration.

Rai33 wrote in post #10452793
@Mic - for me #46 still looks the most professional, serious and less like my daughter drew a lime Maybe just the first J should look more like a "J" than an "I".

Plus 1 on that, although I see the J as an "i".
The best thing is the logo is subtle and will not tire as quick as the others.

rooeey wrote in post #10437663
For the record i am no longer ordering from the States.....
The last two products i ordered have gone missing...One was a 1DMK111 via UPS went missing UPS Sydney 3 months later i got my insurance less PAYPAL 3% less postage and an adverse move in currency and now my Sekonic L358 has not shown up via USPS..
I have learned my lesson now....An expensive one at that....

Ok so it's been over three weeks and my Sekonic L358 showed up...Yippee..

+1 on #46 for me Mic, I think it'll out last the others and is just that little bit simplier which will keep it more professional.

Just my 2c.

My L358 is on the way shortly too =]

Side question. . . With the RF602's can I use the remote function and still use it to fire a remote flash too, assuming I have 2 recievers (on on camera, one on flash)? I tried quickly last night, albeit tired and they didn't seem to sync properly.

I think Austen better buy the lights before the dollar falls any further, 84 cents uhhhh ohhh here we go again!

Interesting,#46 is ok but it looks so much like every other photography logo out there with aperture blades really that I didn't stop on it. If I were going with something like that, I'd probably lean towards the ones that look more like fruit, though so far they remind more of apples or alarm clocks LOL #44 is closest in this category for me, I think, but the inner aperture blades just aren't quite right and I'm not sure that it translates quite as well in black and white & I don't know how the drop shadow will work if you want to use it as a watermark on your photos?

91 doesn't work for me. 92 I kinda like but there's something I just can't put my finger on that doesn't WOW me.

The ones with the little camera I kinda like - a bit more personality than the more traditional ones. And I like 36.

How totally unhelpful was that??

It's morning, it's cold, I'm swamped and running behind and it's only 0640. Fought a migraine all day yesterday so if it wasn't totally urgent, it didn't get dealt with. So another day of trying to do two days in one! Vrrrrooomm here I go!

TwoShoes wrote in post #10454888
+1 on #46 for me Mic, I think it'll out last the others and is just that little bit simplier which will keep it more professional.

Just my 2c.

My L358 is on the way shortly too =]

Side question. . . With the RF602's can I use the remote function and still use it to fire a remote flash too, assuming I have 2 recievers (on on camera, one on flash)? I tried quickly last night, albeit tired and they didn't seem to sync properly.

Sure,

This works fine, as long as you have the minimum 2 transmitters and 2 receivers needed to do this. You use one pair for the camera remote transmitter/receiver and they need to be on a different frequency (flip one switch on both) to the flash pair.

Ash

ash.m wrote in post #10455856
Sure,

This works fine, as long as you have the minimum 2 transmitters and 2 receivers needed to do this. You use one pair for the camera remote transmitter/receiver and they need to be on a different frequency (flip one switch on both) to the flash pair.

Ash

Ahhhh,

I hadn't noticed that you required the second Transmitter, I'll order one today =. So far from the limited chance I've got to use the 602's them seem really good, far better than my V4's. I also decided to add one of those $5 Mini Speedlight Softboxes to my order, the couple of test shots I took suprised me, I really can't wait to have some real modifiers to use.

Greatly appreciated ash.

BOSS wrote in post #10452787
12 entries left and four with a five star rating,should make it a bit easier for you juice.

One hopes. Unfortunately, a couple of the tweaks I asked for overnight haven't happened.

Rai33 wrote in post #10452793
@Mic - for me #46 still looks the most professional, serious and less like my daughter drew a lime Maybe just the first J should look more like a "J" than an "I".

Is your daughter good at drawing?

I like #46 a lot. Not sure if it's the best for me though.

blackshadow wrote in post #10453015
Design #44 is my pick from the bunch left for consideration.

I like that too, but it's a bit complicated, I think.

coalcliff wrote in post #10454379
Plus 1 on that, although I see the J as an "i".
The best thing is the logo is subtle and will not tire as quick as the others.

Agreed on the subtlety.

rooeey wrote in post #10454750
Ok so it's been over three weeks and my Sekonic L358 showed up...Yippee..

It's a great meter.

TwoShoes wrote in post #10454888
+1 on #46 for me Mic, I think it'll out last the others and is just that little bit simplier which will keep it more professional.

Yeah, I can't quite get myself to like it as much as a couple of the others.

coalcliff wrote in post #10455786
I think Austen better buy the lights before the dollar falls any further, 84 cents uhhhh ohhh here we go again!

Can't believe I did something right in terms of the exchange rate. Bizarre.

kja wrote in post #10455832
91 doesn't work for me. 92 I kinda like but there's something I just can't put my finger on that doesn't WOW me.

I've asked for 92 to be redone to get rid of the double J look - ie meld them better.

You mean #21/#81?

#36 has been replaced by #96.

Excellent, thanks


7D now 2135 @ DCW: http://www.digitalcame​rawarehouse.com.au/cat​egory577_1.htm

Not my pic:

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

OMG... some people are stupid or what!
http://forums.overcloc​kers.com.au …996&posted=1#po​st12010996

ed. wrote in post #10456513
OMG... some people are stupid or what!
http://forums.overcloc​kers.com.au …996&posted=1#po​st12010996

OCAU has more idiots on it than Whirlpool.