Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 22 Jan 2010 (Friday) 11:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Face Detection = "Racist" Cameras!

 
Rick ­ Anderson
Senior Member
Avatar
565 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Apr 2007
     
Jan 22, 2010 11:40 |  #1

I guess not all groups have equal protection under the face-detection software act:
http://news.yahoo.com …22/wl_time/0859​9195464300 (external link)

On a related note, my camera must also be a racist because it tries to deny my heritage by making me 18% gray!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oaktree
Goldmember
1,835 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Jan 22, 2010 11:57 |  #2

Hilarious. I better un-squint my eyes -- :)


Too much stuff, not enough shooting time.

Canon T4i (2 lenses), Fuji X100s, Olympus OM-D EM-1 (3 lenses)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IslandCrow
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Rapid City, SD
     
Jan 22, 2010 13:39 |  #3

On a related note, my camera must also be a racist because it tries to deny my heritage by making me 18% gray!

Now, that made me laugh, and I haven't even gotten to the article yet.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
10megapixel
"I'm a little slow"
Avatar
3,872 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2008
Location: ……Surrounded by Corn and Rednecks in Indiana
     
Jan 22, 2010 13:42 as a reply to  @ IslandCrow's post |  #4

"Did someone blink?" :lol:



Gear List & Feedback



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tallking
Member
184 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Pensacola FL
     
Jan 22, 2010 13:55 |  #5

I would find the whole story a lot easier to accept, were it not for the fact that the vast majority of the design work on our cameras is done, however one may feel about it, by humans of Asian descent.

Perhaps it's my perspective bias (I earn a living doing court-appointed criminal defense work in the deep south...), but I fully expected this thread to be about cameras having trouble "locking on" to darker faces. Silly me. I was totally surprised that some cameras are having difficulty with Asian eyes in their normal, comfortable, relaxed state. Especially in light of where most (all?) of our cameras come from.

Disclaimer: my philosophy of life is to treat everyone, irrespective of complexion, reproductive plumbing, eye shape, or whatever; the way I want to be treated. Works pretty well, actually...


Canon XSi
Canon G-10

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arstine
Member
Avatar
145 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Rapid City, S.D.
     
Jan 22, 2010 14:09 |  #6

Skipping the whole racist part of the story I believe this quote says it all.

From the article, "Perhaps in this market of rapidly developing technologies, consumers who fork over a few hundred dollars for the latest gadget are the test market."

I'm just amused that TIME took this long to come out and say it. Anyone that's used a computer to play games will grumble and nod with me about all the unfinished products that hit the market. These companies are in such a hurry to ship their products that it has become standard practice to get things "close enough" that they can put out a patch later that might get it close to what they promised the consumer to begin with.


My camera says Canon and goes clickity clickity click.
My Flickr (external link)- (external link)Snapshots and fun pics go here.
http://www.photosbyjas​on.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
10megapixel
"I'm a little slow"
Avatar
3,872 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2008
Location: ……Surrounded by Corn and Rednecks in Indiana
     
Jan 22, 2010 15:13 as a reply to  @ Arstine's post |  #7

Nikon,HP...pfft. Canons face detection works so well it could find an albino in a snowstorm :lol:.



Gear List & Feedback



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Quizzical_Squirrel
Senior Member
489 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jan 22, 2010 15:22 |  #8

On a similar note and I have no idea if it's true, a salesman told me that cameras are sometimes calibrated for the dominant skin tone of that batch's intended market.

So a camera bought in Japan might yield subtle differences to an identical model bought in the US. This is what I was doing, replacing a point and shoot bought in Tokyo (that I'd dropped and broken the sensor) with the same model in a US store and the salesman warned me that I may notice a difference.

Does this sound plausible or do you reckon this is a sales pitch because he was trying to push me towards a different brand?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Jan 22, 2010 15:44 |  #9

My GF-1 has a feature to supposedly recognize faces that you have set up in it and prefer to focus on them. It captions the face it recognizes on the LCD when you are composing.

The funny thing is that it reliably recognizes the members of my family (wife and 4 kids) but it hopelessly confuses who is who.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mbellot
"My dog ate my title"
Avatar
3,365 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Jul 2005
Location: The Miami of Canada - Chicago!
     
Jan 22, 2010 16:01 |  #10

10megapixel wrote in post #9448753 (external link)
"Did someone blink?" :lol:

Invariably.

:lol::lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,486 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jan 22, 2010 16:08 |  #11

Cobbler's kids have no shoes, Japanese camera face detection does not work on Asian faces.

What's so odd about that?! ;)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Jan 22, 2010 17:39 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=Vn2KihNKCL8 (external link)

Here is a youtube video on a webcam face detection




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bakedcookies
Senior Member
860 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Jan 22, 2010 18:34 |  #13

That is hilarious!!!!! lmfao!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tallking
Member
184 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Pensacola FL
     
Jan 22, 2010 22:05 |  #14

Quizzical_Squirrel wrote in post #9449478 (external link)
On a similar note and I have no idea if it's true, a salesman told me that cameras are sometimes calibrated for the dominant skin tone of that batch's intended market.

So a camera bought in Japan might yield subtle differences to an identical model bought in the US. This is what I was doing, replacing a point and shoot bought in Tokyo (that I'd dropped and broken the sensor) with the same model in a US store and the salesman warned me that I may notice a difference.

Does this sound plausible or do you reckon this is a sales pitch because he was trying to push me towards a different brand?

Wow -- programmed in racial prejudice! So, if you're an American who happens to be of African genetic heritage, you're just hosed as far as facial recognition, I suppose. . .

Perhaps the best way to address this would be to have a feature on the settings menu whereby the owner could set the dominant skin tone of the household as a guidepost for the face detection feature (and perhaps AWB) too.

Ahhhh, what a strange world we live in! :cool:


Canon XSi
Canon G-10

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rick ­ Anderson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
565 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Apr 2007
     
Jan 22, 2010 23:44 as a reply to  @ Tallking's post |  #15

I think the real solution is to learn photography. Believe it or not, I can recognize faces - even those different from mine - without the camera telling me, "hey look, there's a face." :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,597 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
Face Detection = "Racist" Cameras!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2753 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.