Yep. It's made with a metalish (If thats a word) fabrick that blocks the noise. It works great.
CxThree Senior Member 713 posts Joined May 2009 More info | Jan 27, 2010 22:31 | #16 Yep. It's made with a metalish (If thats a word) fabrick that blocks the noise. It works great. Canon EOS 5D MKIII, 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChrisMc73 Goldmember 3,212 posts Likes: 7 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Edmond, OK More info | Jan 27, 2010 22:34 | #17 This demo seems to be a better example of the two PW's actually working from a distance.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChrisMc73 Goldmember 3,212 posts Likes: 7 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Edmond, OK More info | Jan 27, 2010 22:35 | #18 CxThree wrote in post #9487000 Yep. It's made with a metalish (If thats a word) fabrick that blocks the noise. It works great. Can't wait to get mine!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CxThree Senior Member 713 posts Joined May 2009 More info | Jan 27, 2010 22:41 | #19 ChrisMc73 wrote in post #9487022 This demo seems to be a better example of the two PW's actually working from a distance. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKd2vLuVfms&NR=1 Proof is in the pudding. If you really want a test, look at this one. Its outside with all kinds of stuff going on. Canon EOS 5D MKIII, 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChrisMc73 Goldmember 3,212 posts Likes: 7 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Edmond, OK More info | Jan 27, 2010 23:12 | #20 Nice.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarkBooth Senior Member 393 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2003 More info | Jan 28, 2010 00:44 | #21 Somebody let me know when they make Canon-compatible FlexTT5 and MiniTT1 models that don't require a stupid sock to be put over the flash. It's insane that they haven't announced a redesign of the actual product. "If a day goes by without my doing something related to photography, it's as though I've neglected something essential to my existence, as though I had forgotten to wake up."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mickeyjuice Cream of the Crop 7,876 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Jan 28, 2010 00:46 | #22 Permanent banMark Booth wrote in post #9487753 Somebody let me know when they make Canon-compatible FlexTT5 and MiniTT1 models that don't require a stupid sock to be put over the flash. It's insane that they haven't announced a redesign of the actual product. Mark Yes, insane. I'm sure they haven't thought of as many options as they can, good point. cheers, juice (Canon shooter, Elinchrom lighter, but pretty much agnostic on brands.)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 28, 2010 02:02 | #23 LoganJ wrote in post #9482057 Unm.. Couldn't you return them anyways? As long as your dealer has a normal return policy I don't see this being that special. Am I missing something here? Dealers usually have a 15 day return policy with a 15% restocking fee and they usually have a list of items that they will NOT take back. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 28, 2010 02:07 | #24 Mark Booth wrote in post #9487753 Somebody let me know when they make Canon-compatible FlexTT5 and MiniTT1 models that don't require a stupid sock to be put over the flash. It's insane that they haven't announced a redesign of the actual product. Mark Here we go again..lol _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
philllie1 Member 92 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Jan 28, 2010 07:08 | #25 williejr wrote in post #9488011 Here we go again..lol Why should they? It's not PW fault. It is Canon's fault for making a noisy speedlites (Canon 580EX, 580EXII). The sock is the solution by PW, Canon could careless. yes here we are again. and there are people with a different point of view out there. they see that many brands like skyports or radiopoppers work perfectly with canon flashes - but only the pw products have problems. so don't tell us, it's canon's fault.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CxThree Senior Member 713 posts Joined May 2009 More info | Jan 28, 2010 08:06 | #26 ROFL. If it's not the flash, then how does the sock fix the problem? It only covers the flash. Canon EOS 5D MKIII, 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MDteX Senior Member 310 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth More info | Jan 28, 2010 08:42 | #27 williejr wrote in post #9488011 Here we go again..lol Why should they? It's not PW fault. It is Canon's fault for making a noisy speedlites (Canon 580EX, 580EXII). The sock is the solution by PW, Canon could careless. I know I shouldn't do this but.... Canon 1DMkIV, Canon 1DMkIII, Canon 50D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ericski Member 166 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Boise, Idaho More info | Jan 28, 2010 09:58 | #28 |
AlanU Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 28, 2010 10:30 | #29 I guess this is the purpose of this "satisfaction guarantee". 5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ericski Member 166 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Boise, Idaho More info | Jan 28, 2010 12:03 | #30 I was torn between the Radio Popper PX & PW's. I chose PW's because they didn't require anything else for a trigger, compatibility with strobes with embedded Pocket Wizards even if it is only basic triggering, a couple of more features (second curtain sync,) and the upcoming Zone Controller product. Plus the PX system is more expensive.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1794 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||