B+W Filter recommendation

I have a Canon 10-22 and 70-200 2.8 both utilize a 77mm filter. So instead of buying two identical filters, am I better off purchasing two different ones to maximize their use (flip to lens as needed)?

I'm mostly shooting landscape and motorcycle/car racing.

Prefer B+W

Leaning toward 1:
B+W 77mm Haze 010 MRC UV

What should I do on the second? ND?

Or is there something is should do entirely different?

TIA

Your sensor already has a UV filter.

Probably. I'm moving this to landscape "Talk".

ND is one way to go, but since you shoot landscapes I'd personally lean toward a CPL first.

For landscape, I would recommend a CPL and GND 4-stop soft (for starters).

For motorcycle/car racing, you don't really need any filter as anything you put between your subject and sensor is just going to lengthen your exposure, and you're going to want fairly fast exposures when shooting moving objects. For stationary vehicles, the GND is handy for cutting reflections/glare.

Hope this helps.

John

Thanks, I ordered a B+W UV filter, and plan on using that at the track for nothing more than lens protection.

I'll start shopping for a pair of CPL and GND filters next

If you're going to get GND filters, I strongly recommend getting a rectangular filter system and holder. If you get the screw-in type you will not be able to make adjustments for the horizon.. the "split" will always be in the exact middle of your image. I suggest Lee, but Hi-tech has a good offering as well. Some use the Cokin system, but I've never been a big fan of that one.

I'd definitely get the CPL first. That's one of the few filters where there's no workaround in PP. GNDs are definitely a great idea, but you can actually achieve the same effect using multiple exposures blended in Photoshop. You'll be spending significantly more time in front of the computer, though.