Cool review. I would love to see the Sigma 1.4 included tho. Maybe next time? =)
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Jan 28, 2010 14:18 | #16 Cool review. I would love to see the Sigma 1.4 included tho. Maybe next time? =) Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
m3n00b Member 146 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: SoCal More info | Jan 28, 2010 14:29 | #17 KenjiS wrote in post #9490751 is it just me or is the f/1.4's colors the worst of the three.. like the f/1.8 is a slight more saturated as is the f/1.2... (Well the f/1.2 is an L) Agreed. I'm very surprised that the nifty's performance! Current-500d/18-55efs/nifty-two-fifty/UV Filters/CPL Filter/ND Filters/72"tripod/bag/0 skills
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonyniev Cream of the Crop More info | Jan 28, 2010 14:29 | #18 at $99 the 1.8 is sure a good bang for the price. Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Jan 28, 2010 14:34 | #19 I love how no one is willing to call the nifty fifty a "good lens" only a "good lens for the price" Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RiderOnTheStorm Member 35 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Fort Myers Florida More info | Jan 28, 2010 14:50 | #20 Nice detail review. Canon XS| 18-55 IS | 55-250 IS | Canon Monopod
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zincozinco -Followers of Fidget- 4,420 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: AndalucĂa More info | Jan 28, 2010 15:01 | #21 great test - i have had and used the 1.8, 1.4 and the sigmalux. This really settled it for me, im happy that i sold them all. im getting the zeiss again... maybe.... Living the life, overexposing...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackhawk Goldmember 1,785 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: East coast for now More info | Jan 28, 2010 15:12 | #22 dkspook, great review You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bsaber I have no idea what's going on 3,536 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Jan 28, 2010 15:46 | #23 Great review! And the nifty fifty is a good lens. I would never ever use it again so long as I have the 1.4 or the L. But it is a good lens
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackhawk Goldmember 1,785 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: East coast for now More info | Jan 28, 2010 15:57 | #24 bsaber wrote in post #9492125 Great review! And the nifty fifty is a good lens. I would never ever use it again so long as I have the 1.4 or the L. But it is a good lens ![]() The "other" 50's do surprisingly well as far as IQ. You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | Jan 28, 2010 17:47 | #25 themadman wrote in post #9491589 I love how no one is willing to call the nifty fifty a "good lens" only a "good lens for the price" I am willing to say it, stand back folks, the nifty fifty is a good lens! I agree its a good lens, optically Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kidslash Member 173 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: NJ More info | Jan 28, 2010 18:57 | #26 Great test! Thank you so much. I really love my nifty fifty but I have a big crush on my Sigma 50 right now. L quality glass for $500, that is if you can your hands on a good copy. Canon 5DMII - 1DMIII - Nikon 14-24mm - Canon 17-40L - Canon 50mm f/1.8 - Sigma 50mm f/1.4 - Canon 85mm f/1.8 - 85L - 100L Macro - Canon 24-105L - Canon 70-200mm L IS f/4.0 - Canon 300L f/2.8 - Speedlite 580EX II and 580EX "Every picture tells a story don't it..."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
skygod44 "in stockings and suspenders" 6,454 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 110 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan. Which means nowhere near Tokyo! More info | Great review, and thanks for the effort. "Whatever you do, enjoy yourself...otherwise, what's the point."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
e.omega Senior Member 487 posts Joined Aug 2008 Location: Houston,Texas More info | Jan 28, 2010 19:14 | #28 Thanks for the review. T2i | 30 f/1.4 | 18-55 IS| 430EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | Jan 28, 2010 19:15 | #29 skygod44 wrote in post #9493463 Great review, and thanks for the effort. Makes me ponder (yet again!) if I should simply replace my 50f1.4 with another one when the AF dies, and aim for the 35L to fill a gap, rather than the 50L to replace the f1.4.... ![]() Geesh they really need to fix that stupid 50mm f/1.4 :/ Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
skygod44 "in stockings and suspenders" 6,454 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 110 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan. Which means nowhere near Tokyo! More info | Jan 28, 2010 19:23 | #30 KenjiS wrote in post #9493474 Geesh they really need to fix that stupid 50mm f/1.4 :/ It seems like almost 50% of the people who buy one have the AF fail Hey Kenji, it's not failed, but I love 50mm with a wide aperture, so I use it a LOT! "Whatever you do, enjoy yourself...otherwise, what's the point."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1769 guests, 125 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||