Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 28 Jan 2010 (Thursday) 22:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ACTUAL reach of APS-C vs Full-frame

 
birder_herper
Senior Member
845 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 59
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jan 28, 2010 22:34 |  #1

How do I determine the actual reach of APS-C vs Full-frame cameras? I hear the 20D has the same reach as a 1Ds Mark III, because the III has way more pixels and larger pixels to offset the crop factor of the 20D. Can anybody tell me how I can determine this formula myself? What do I need to know to calculate it?

I was given this and can't get them to equal:
Canon 20D: 1.6x crop, 8 mp, 6.4 pixel size
Mark III: 1.0x, 21 mp, 6.4 pixel size

I'm missing something! Please help!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14915
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 28, 2010 22:38 |  #2

Its 1.6 period. Its not more complicated than that. You might have come across somebody trying to make some rationalization about cropping after the fact that compares pixel counts or pixel size but its hocus pocus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Jan 29, 2010 05:31 |  #3

GIven your user name, I assume you are typically shooting birds. This is a photography subject that has photographers shooting with their longest lenses and cropping all shots. In such a case, you are correct that you can compare cameras based on their pixel density. Remember though that there is more to this than pure pixel density as later sensors have improved with things like gapless microlenses etc. In my own experience, once you have 'enough' pixels for the print size you want to make then having more doesn't help much. So don't assume if one camera cropped gives 6 MP and another gives 10 MP that the 10 MP image is going to be noticeably better in print.

With that caveat, here is what you asked for:

To find out how many pixels you would have left if you were to crop a FF sensor down to APS_C, multiply the FF pixel total by 0.39. So for the 5D Mark II or 1Ds Mark III you get 21,000,000 x 0.39 = 8,190,000.

To find out how many pixels you would have left if you were to crop APS-H down to APS-C, multiply the APS-H pixel total by 0.68. For the 1D Mark IV you get 16,000,000 x 0.68 = 10,880,000


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

908 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
ACTUAL reach of APS-C vs Full-frame
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2973 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.