Hi all,
I'm a newb and this is my second post in this section. I've had my camera for 1 month and I just want any c&c to improve my new hobby. These 2 shots were taken from a 7d 50mm f1.4.
Thanks.
jonahrei Senior Member 284 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Oakland, CA More info | Jan 30, 2010 01:20 | #1 Hi all, 5D MK II | 7D | 70-200L F4 IS | 24-70L F2.8 | 17-40L F4 | Σ 85 F1.4 | Σ 50 F1.4 | Σ 15 F2.8 Fisheye | 2 Alien Bees 1600 | Alien Bee 400 | 580 EXII | Cybersyncs
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vk2gwk Cream of the Crop 13,360 posts Gallery: 332 photos Likes: 1836 Joined Jun 2009 Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia More info | Jan 30, 2010 01:57 | #2 #2 got something...Nice shot - as if she just jumped off the back of the ute ( = utility vehicle for the non Australians... My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
seaside Slapped with a ridiculous title 5,472 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 Location: North Carolina Coast but traveling the Americas More info | I agree #2 is better. A ramp, like those used for a handicapped person off the tailgate would have created an interesting image Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joedlh Cream of the Crop 5,512 posts Gallery: 52 photos Likes: 684 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea. More info | Jan 30, 2010 12:34 | #4 In both cases, you have your subject looking out the narrowest side of the image. It's better to have her looking into the center. Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | I side with Joe on this one..the eyes need to be clear.I like the first.similar to the other one you posted of her. you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 30, 2010 12:48 | #6 joedlh wrote in post #9504688 In both cases, you have your subject looking out the narrowest side of the image. It's better to have her looking into the center. While others extol the virtues of the f/1.4 lens, the narrow depth of field places great demands on the photographer's sensitivity to where the focus is. In both shots, the hat fibers on her forehead are in focus, but her eyes are not. The cardinal rule of any kind of photography is that if there are eyes in it, they must be the point of focus. Flo wrote in post #9504701 I side with Joe on this one..the eyes need to be clear.I like the first.similar to the other one you posted of her. thanks for the input. i'll make sure to focus on the eyes and get the pic when she's looking towards the center. 5D MK II | 7D | 70-200L F4 IS | 24-70L F2.8 | 17-40L F4 | Σ 85 F1.4 | Σ 50 F1.4 | Σ 15 F2.8 Fisheye | 2 Alien Bees 1600 | Alien Bee 400 | 580 EXII | Cybersyncs
LOG IN TO REPLY |
disjecta Senior Member 602 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Jan 30, 2010 13:10 | #7 For portraiture such as the first shot, I rarely open the lens any more than f2.8. Usually I will only open up a fast lens to the max aperture if I am trying to separate a person or thing from what's behind and in front of it and usually when the subject is at least ten feet away. This is not a hard and fast rule, just one I keep in mind for myself. Many portrait photographers find that between f4 and f5.6 is about right for a medium or medium close portrait. Failure is always an option.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | Well spoken.^ you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
seaside Slapped with a ridiculous title 5,472 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 Location: North Carolina Coast but traveling the Americas More info | Jan 30, 2010 13:42 | #9 joedlh wrote in post #9504688 In both cases, you have your subject looking out the narrowest side of the image. It's better to have her looking into the center. Can be subjective. As a rule yes. However, like disjecta stated "When you do break the rules, you will be doing so deliberately and with a specific purpose". Now I don't know if you had a "specific purpose" when shooting this but in #2 she appears to be in motion and moving away from the the back of the truck...I saw the truck as part of the subject and her moving beyond what we could see in the frame. I personally like the composition. It is true - the focus could be improved. Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joedlh Cream of the Crop 5,512 posts Gallery: 52 photos Likes: 684 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea. More info | Jan 30, 2010 14:10 | #10 Flo wrote in post #9504947 Well spoken.^ ^ ditto Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 30, 2010 18:40 | #11 disjecta wrote in post #9504915 For portraiture such as the first shot, I rarely open the lens any more than f2.8. Usually I will only open up a fast lens to the max aperture if I am trying to separate a person or thing from what's behind and in front of it and usually when the subject is at least ten feet away. This is not a hard and fast rule, just one I keep in mind for myself. Many portrait photographers find that between f4 and f5.6 is about right for a medium or medium close portrait. Now all of that is assuming you are just wanting to shoot a standard portrait. There are many reasons when you might want to veer away from that standard. I sometimes do that myself when I only want the eyes to be in focus and the rest of the face to be blurred. It creates a very intimate and, some might say, claustrophobic feeling. Problems arise when your subject's eyes are not exactly parallel with the lens and one eye is in focus and the other slightly soft...mostly this is distracting and not a desired effect. Like I always say, learn the rules and, when they become second nature, transfer your thinking from your head to your heart. When you do break the rules, you will be doing so deliberately and with a specific purpose. Stick to your vision and let that be your guide but always listen to what your peers have to say. Sometimes what they advise you for one shot may be knowledge you can use in a future shoot so always remain open to criticism. Most of all, don't get too caught up in the technical details. You have a lifetime to learn all that stuff but photography must remain something that is ultimately fun and drives your passion. Get too bogged down in the technique and you will lose your own voice. thank you for the c&c. 5D MK II | 7D | 70-200L F4 IS | 24-70L F2.8 | 17-40L F4 | Σ 85 F1.4 | Σ 50 F1.4 | Σ 15 F2.8 Fisheye | 2 Alien Bees 1600 | Alien Bee 400 | 580 EXII | Cybersyncs
LOG IN TO REPLY |
oRGie Senior Member 398 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Portugal More info | Some very good c&c allready, first one could be tweaked with a layer to sharpen the eyes a touch (mask around them just to sharpen the eyes and highlights in them) and yes would be a better crop looking into the centre of the frame, but the second shot is great as it is, I ride a bike too, dont know if the crutches are due to a bike accident, but its an emotional shot to my eye, the harley jacket implies a bike crash and the framing moving away from the truck but still enough frame on the left to give the motion and direction some room to work, nice oRGie - I am an EOS and the 7D was my idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1059 guests, 166 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||