Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 30 Jan 2010 (Saturday) 22:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

C-stands: chrome or black-painted chrome?

 
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 30, 2010 22:21 |  #1

There was a post mentioning C-stand sin another thread but I didn't want to take the thread off-topic so I decided to create a new thread to ask my question.

RichNY wrote in post #9500368 (external link)
For a gym setup why not just a superclamp and magic arm or small floor stand to support your strobe? The extra few feet the light has to travel isn't going to cost you practically any extra fall off and it makes setup/teardown quicker and safety is improved.

I'm surprised more people here aren't using C-stands.

I just viewed a video (sorry, it's a subscription video so can't provide a link) explaining the C-stands and what their advantages are and I can see where they can come in handy. So, now, I have a question. I see that Avenger carries two types of C-stands, the chrome stands and the black-painted chrome stands. My preference would be for the black-painted chrome stands for obvious reasons. Is any reason why one might be preferable to the other?


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
williejr
Senior Member
746 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Jan 31, 2010 01:38 |  #2

I got the black Avenger C-stands. It really is just a matter of taste. I did not buy the chrome because it might reflect some unwanted stray light. Probably not, but the black stands look classier. :)


_______________
Body: Canon 5D Mark III, 1D Mark IV,
Lens: 85mmL F1.2, 70-200 L F2.8 II, 24mm 1.4 II L II, 35mm F1.4 L, Flashes: 3x 580EX II,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Jan 31, 2010 05:40 |  #3

All my stands are avenger chrome-plated. Seems like the black finish would safeguard you best against light being reflected by the stand but I can't say I've ever noticed this happening in real life.

On the other hand the silver finish will probably wear better under heavy use, flaked paint never looks good. Plus I occasionally have behind-the-scenes filming/photography on my shoots and the big shiny chrome stands look much more impressive :)

I say just get whatever version is cheaper. Also bear in mind that most avenger stuff (afaik) is only sold in silver anyway so you'll find it hard to get only black-finished stuff.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jan 31, 2010 06:07 |  #4

I use chrome Matthews stands. Considering the abuse commercial stands get being loaded and unloaded daily from storage rooms and onto trucks I agreee with Hermes that the black paint will most likely flake over time.

If I were looking to buy C-Stands today I would go used buying from a rental house or Craigslist. A good C-stand is pretty much destruction proof and the wear and tear mine got from commercial use before I owned them just gave them a nice patina.

Leo- Perhaps you could share some of the advantages that you saw in the video for those who might not know yet.


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pyromaniac
Senior Member
Avatar
541 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Mt Washington in Cincinnati, Oh
     
Jan 31, 2010 07:06 |  #5

PacAce wrote in post #9508005 (external link)
I just viewed a video (sorry, it's a subscription video so can't provide a link) explaining the C-stands and what their advantages are and I can see where they can come in handy.

Can you post a link to the sites home page so we can subscribe and watch the video? Do they have any other videos people might find interesting or informative?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 31, 2010 09:13 |  #6

williejr wrote in post #9508972 (external link)
I got the black Avenger C-stands. It really is just a matter of taste. I did not buy the chrome because it might reflect some unwanted stray light. Probably not, but the black stands look classier. :)

That is the reason I prefer the black stand but I also had concerns about the paint flaking off (chrome doesn't seem to hold paint too well over time) as pointed out by Hermes and Rich.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 31, 2010 10:00 |  #7

RichNY wrote in post #9509486 (external link)
I use chrome Matthews stands. Considering the abuse commercial stands get being loaded and unloaded daily from storage rooms and onto trucks I agreee with Hermes that the black paint will most likely flake over time.

If I were looking to buy C-Stands today I would go used buying from a rental house or Craigslist. A good C-stand is pretty much destruction proof and the wear and tear mine got from commercial use before I owned them just gave them a nice patina.

Leo- Perhaps you could share some of the advantages that you saw in the video for those who might not know yet.

1) The video shows how close you can place two regular light stands. With the heavy-duty lightstands used in the demo, the stands could be placed as close as 16" apart from each other. The C-stand, on the other hand, could be placed 1" apart from each other. (Is this what people mean when they say "C-stands stack very well"?)

This attribute is nice but I'm hard pressed to see when I would need to have two stands very close to each other under normal usage.

2) The legs of the C-stand can be positioned any way one desires. For example, two legs can be positioned 180 degrees from each other with the middle leg pointed 90 degrees from the other two (with the legs forming a "T" pattern). Positioned this way, the stand can be butted up right against the wall. I can see this being very useful when you need to get the stand as close to the wall as possible, like for use with a background stand. The closest I can get my background stand to the wall is 11". That may not really be much but when you have a small studio space like I do, that can make a difference in how much separation you can get between the subject and the background.

3) The legs can also be positioned with the two outer legs 90 degrees from each other and the middle leg 45 degrees from the other legs. Set this way, the C-stand will easily fit into a corner without taking up much space like a normal stand would. Again, useful for backgrounds in tight quarters.

Of course, the drawback to them, at over $100 a piece for a stand that extends to 8 ft. or taller, is that they cost much more than a standard light stand. Yes, they are virtually indestructible but that's not really an important attribute when used in a studio environment. If you do a lot of location shooting, then that's a different story.

I can see myself using the C-stands as a background stand because of the space I can get back compared to using the regular background stand, but I don't think I'd replace my regular (heavy-duty) light stands with them because I have yet to see the advantage of doing that for me. But, as always, other people's mileage may vary. :)

Pyromaniac wrote in post #9509603 (external link)
Can you post a link to the sites home page so we can subscribe and watch the video? Do they have any other videos people might find interesting or informative?

Here's the link to video on the C-stand: http://www.izzyvideo.c​om/2008/03/30/c-stands/ (external link)

Izzy has a lot of tutorial videos that are geared mostly towards video but many are applicable to still photography as well.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 31, 2010 10:05 |  #8

RichNY wrote in post #9509486 (external link)
I use chrome Matthews stands. Considering the abuse commercial stands get being loaded and unloaded daily from storage rooms and onto trucks I agreee with Hermes that the black paint will most likely flake over time.

If I were looking to buy C-Stands today I would go used buying from a rental house or Craigslist. A good C-stand is pretty much destruction proof and the wear and tear mine got from commercial use before I owned them just gave them a nice patina.

Leo- Perhaps you could share some of the advantages that you saw in the video for those who might not know yet.

Rich, the Impact and the Matthews stands at B&H are described as "chrome finish" rather than "chrome steel construction" like the Avengers are. Can you (or anybody else who know) tell me what differences there are, if any, between the two types of construction?


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bumgardnern
Senior Member
977 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Nashvegas
     
Jan 31, 2010 10:16 |  #9

I usually go with the chrome. I actually ping reflections off the stands from time to time. C-Stands are the way to go for the studio enviroment.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Jan 31, 2010 10:36 |  #10

PacAce wrote in post #9510246 (external link)
1) The video shows how close you can place two regular light stands. With the heavy-duty lightstands used in the demo, the stands could be placed as close as 16" apart from each other. The C-stand, on the other hand, could be placed 1" apart from each other. (Is this what people mean when they say "C-stands stack very well"?)

This attribute is nice but I'm hard pressed to see when I would need to have two stands very close to each other under normal usage.

2) The legs of the C-stand can be positioned any way one desires. For example, two legs can be positioned 180 degrees from each other with the middle leg pointed 90 degrees from the other two (with the legs forming a "T" pattern). Positioned this way, the stand can be butted up right against the wall. I can see this being very useful when you need to get the stand as close to the wall as possible, like for use with a background stand. The closest I can get my background stand to the wall is 11". That may not really be much but when you have a small studio space like I do, that can make a difference in how much separation you can get between the subject and the background.

3) The legs can also be positioned with the two outer legs 90 degrees from each other and the middle leg 45 degrees from the other legs. Set this way, the C-stand will easily fit into a corner without taking up much space like a normal stand would. Again, useful for backgrounds in tight quarters.

Of course, the drawback to them, at over $100 a piece for a stand that extends to 8 ft. or taller, is that they cost much more than a standard light stand. Yes, they are virtually indestructible but that's not really an important attribute when used in a studio environment. If you do a lot of location shooting, then that's a different story.

I can see myself using the C-stands as a background stand because of the space I can get back compared to using the regular background stand, but I don't think I'd replace my regular (heavy-duty) light stands with them because I have yet to see the advantage of doing that for me. But, as always, other people's mileage may vary. :)

Here's the link to video on the C-stand: http://www.izzyvideo.c​om/2008/03/30/c-stands/ (external link)

Izzy has a lot of tutorial videos that are geared mostly towards video but many are applicable to still photography as well.

On the other hand, you can't adjust the size of a c-stand's footprint like you can with folding stands, which is just as vital when shooting in a small space.

With stands like the A510 and A700, I often only open the legs out a small amount when they only have to support something lightweight and centred which means they take up very little floor space. When they're holding something heavy on a boom I open them out to the full 1.5m (ish) where they're rock solid. With a c-stand you're always fixed at somewhere in-between which can be a disadvantage if you need versatility.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jan 31, 2010 10:55 |  #11

Hermes wrote in post #9510432 (external link)
On the other hand, you can't adjust the size of a c-stand's footprint like you can with folding stands, which is just as vital when shooting in a small space.

With stands like the A510 and A700, I often only open the legs out a small amount when they only have to support something lightweight and centred which means they take up very little floor space. When they're holding something heavy on a boom I open them out to the full 1.5m (ish) where they're rock solid. With a c-stand you're always fixed at somewhere in-between which can be a disadvantage if you need versatility.

That's a very good point about being able to adjust the spread of the legs on regular light stands which isn't possible with the C-stands. I do that as well.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
williejr
Senior Member
746 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Jan 31, 2010 11:52 |  #12

If you use the C's in photog studio enviroment, they will not suffer the same abuse as in a movie studio enviroment. I've had mine black almost two years and they look brand new. My regular lightstands have more wear. :)

I've bought C's that were used in film/movie studio enviroment off craigslist and they are banged up like you would not believe, but they work and I got them for cheap. I use those to flag my strobes, hold up background support or to hold scrims.


_______________
Body: Canon 5D Mark III, 1D Mark IV,
Lens: 85mmL F1.2, 70-200 L F2.8 II, 24mm 1.4 II L II, 35mm F1.4 L, Flashes: 3x 580EX II,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aroundlsu
Goldmember
Avatar
1,430 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 9
Joined Mar 2009
     
Jan 31, 2010 13:04 |  #13

C stands are great. I rave about them. I refuse to use the excess of regular light stands we have in the studio now that I have enough matthews stands of all sizes. I have destroyed two lights in the last year with regular light stands. Never destroyed anything with c stands.

Be sure to check the other Matthews grip gear. I got a few small clamps with baby pins and won't believe how useful they are. You can put a light just about anywhere without need for a light stand. In fact, on location scouts the first thing I think about is how to place the lights without the need for stands.

I have been planning to write a blog post titled something like "Hey photographer, you don't always need to use a light stand!"

Oh you will need some sandbags. Don't use that grip head and arm without sandbags.


Teddy Smith, SOC
IATSE Local 600 Cinematographer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tomevision
Member
Avatar
114 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Hollywood, California
     
Jan 31, 2010 13:15 |  #14

American C-Stands are the best! Better knuckles and friction pads. When used properly, they can support just about anything...


Canon 5D Mark III | Canon 1Ds Mark II | 16-35L II | 24-70L | 70-200L f/2.8 IS | 4-580EX II | Gitzo GT2540 | Markins Q3/TB-20/PG-50 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyee
Senior Member
981 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Boston, PRofMA
     
Jan 31, 2010 14:59 |  #15

Matthews black paint sucks. I sent them pics of mine which were obviously collapsed while the paint was still wet so it looked pretty blotchy but they just ignored it...so much for the "stand 100% behind our manufacturing quality" in their catalog ;-P
Get chrome...they're fairly heavy to use on location too. I prefer the Lowel Grand Stand for location use...


Pentax K20D, 77Ltd, 43Ltd, Sigma 17-70, 60-250/4, crapload of Strobist gear (SB28's, RP JrX Studios, Einsteins, WL, Speedo BD, softboxes, grids, etc.)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,225 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
C-stands: chrome or black-painted chrome?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1613 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.