Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 03 Feb 2010 (Wednesday) 20:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

panoramic

 
momoe
Senior Member
438 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Feb 03, 2010 20:27 |  #1

ok, here is a noob question I cant find an answer for... when shooting a panoramic photo, do you set up in the middle of the shot and pan from side to side or do you move the camera in a line down the way? I have a group of motorcycle riders that want a panoramic of the whole crew. they will line the bikes up and mount them and I will take the shots. would I get a better image if i panned or if I moved? also, what size do you normally print them at?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asysin2leads
I'm kissing arse
Avatar
6,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, OH
     
Feb 03, 2010 22:20 |  #2

Your best best would be to make sure you use a tripod and keep it level. It will make merging the images easier. Make sure you overlap at least 1/3 of each image so that you don't miss anything. I would start in the middle and work 1 direction than the other. Use Photostitch that came w/ your camera. It works well and you already have it. The photomerge in Photoshop works great, too.


Kevin
https://www.google.com ….com&ctz=Americ​a/New_York (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
momoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
438 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Feb 03, 2010 22:25 as a reply to  @ asysin2leads's post |  #3

ok, so move and not pan?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spiralspirit
Senior Member
940 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Manitoba, Canada
     
Feb 03, 2010 22:33 |  #4

pan, but remember that the axis on which you should be turning is at the rear of the lens, not the rear of the camera.


canon 1dmk2* Canon XSi * Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 EX DG * Canon 17-40mm f/4L * Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 EX * Canon 50mm f/1.8 *

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asysin2leads
I'm kissing arse
Avatar
6,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, OH
     
Feb 03, 2010 22:34 |  #5

momoe wrote in post #9536780 (external link)
ok, so move and not pan?

Nope, pan. If you move, chances are you'll move closer or farther away and put things out of perspective. Also, don't zoom when you pan.


Kevin
https://www.google.com ….com&ctz=Americ​a/New_York (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
momoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
438 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Feb 03, 2010 22:47 |  #6

spiralspirit wrote in post #9536836 (external link)
pan, but remember that the axis on which you should be turning is at the rear of the lens, not the rear of the camera.

if im on the tripod, is there any other way for it to move? could you explain a little more?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asysin2leads
I'm kissing arse
Avatar
6,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, OH
     
Feb 03, 2010 22:57 |  #7

momoe wrote in post #9536930 (external link)
if im on the tripod, is there any other way for it to move? could you explain a little more?

That's where having a decent head on the tripod comes in handy. Leave the tripod set up and turn the head/camera. If you don't have a decent tripod/head, the you can hand hold the shot. You are just putting too many variables in the mix and making the software work harder and it might miss something. I'm not saying it can't be done.


Kevin
https://www.google.com ….com&ctz=Americ​a/New_York (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
momoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
438 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Feb 03, 2010 23:24 |  #8

asysin2leads wrote in post #9536997 (external link)
That's where having a decent head on the tripod comes in handy. Leave the tripod set up and turn the head/camera. If you don't have a decent tripod/head, the you can hand hold the shot. You are just putting too many variables in the mix and making the software work harder and it might miss something. I'm not saying it can't be done.

sorry, im not use to different tripod heads. does the head move with the center column or does the camera turn on the head? im just not picturing it. not trying to be a smart ass.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reddyroc007
Senior Member
Avatar
809 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Iqaluit, NU
     
Feb 03, 2010 23:32 |  #9

i think the point he is trying to make is that for best results the camera should rotate about the rear of the lens and not the camera. imagine sticking a long pin vertically through the rear of the lens when its mounted on the camera, this would be the ideal place to rotate from to get a true perspective. i have a cheapo tripod that prolly rotates about the back of the camera rather than lens. not sure though, gonna try my hand at pano's this week sometime too. goodluck and let us know how it goes.


chris :cool:
gear: 450D w/kung-fu grip, 18-55mm IS, 50mm 1.8, 100-300L, 24-70L, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, 580EXII
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asysin2leads
I'm kissing arse
Avatar
6,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, OH
     
Feb 03, 2010 23:34 |  #10

momoe wrote in post #9537126 (external link)
sorry, im not use to different tripod heads. does the head move with the center column or does the camera turn on the head? im just not picturing it. not trying to be a smart ass.

The head of the tripod pivots. The camera is secured to the head of the tripod via the little threads on the bottom of the camera. Take a look here (external link). This is a tripod ball head. Hope this helps.


Kevin
https://www.google.com ….com&ctz=Americ​a/New_York (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
itzcryptic
Goldmember
1,174 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati
     
Feb 04, 2010 00:28 |  #11

Ideally, you would want to rotate around the nodal point of the lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asysin2leads
I'm kissing arse
Avatar
6,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, OH
     
Feb 04, 2010 00:39 |  #12

itzcryptic wrote in post #9537401 (external link)
Ideally, you would want to rotate around the nodal point of the lens.

I was trying not to get too technical. Ideally, he would want a pano head, but I don't think he's going to be doing something like this very often.


Kevin
https://www.google.com ….com&ctz=Americ​a/New_York (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sparkin
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,522 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Lex, Ky
     
Feb 19, 2010 19:06 |  #13

In principle you could do it either way, i.e. by translation or by rotation. Rotation is by far the easier option. As was stated earlier, ideally you'd use a panohead to ensure rotation about the no-parallax point. For a one off you could use a "philopod" (Google it !), which works well when done correctly. You can make industrial strength panoheads too - there are instructions on my webpage, here:

http://xray.uky.edu …in/panohead/pan​ohead.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

807 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
panoramic
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2845 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.