Hi there. Just want to ask those who are using or used this bag.
Do you think it will hold: 7D, 70-200 2.8 L IS, 17-55/ 2.8 ISL 30/1.4?
nonick Goldmember 1,588 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: NYC More info | Feb 04, 2010 01:44 | #1 Hi there. Just want to ask those who are using or used this bag. Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johnlo Goldmember 1,113 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Feb 04, 2010 11:33 | #2 yes. johnlo photography :
LOG IN TO REPLY |
t.o.n.g. Member 71 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Feb 04, 2010 11:51 | #3 ditto.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 04, 2010 12:56 | #4 I fit similar stuff in mine plus a flash. I assume the interior space is the same on a 22 and 20.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GotTurbo? Senior Member More info | Feb 04, 2010 20:22 | #5 Mine works with 1D, 70-200 F4, 24-105 and a couple of flashes/triggers/filters. I can fit it in with my 70-200 attached, but it's so tight, it makes me uncomfortable. You won't be able to put your body with the 70-200 2.8 attached.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CxThree Senior Member 713 posts Joined May 2009 More info | Feb 04, 2010 21:18 | #6 I just bought a 11.3 inch netbook and have looked at this bag for vacations. The compartment sounds like its only up to 10 inch netbook, but I have seen many bags where people were able to fit a larger notebook in than the ratings said. Anyone use this with a larger than 10 inch netbook or notebook? If so, this would be a good vacation bag for me for my upcoming trip to Mexico. Canon EOS 5D MKIII, 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 04, 2010 23:54 | #7 johnlo wrote in post #9539779 yes. note that the 70-200 cannot be attached to the camera if you want to fit in the bag. also your 17-55 is not a L lense. Thanks. Good catch, it's not L but actaully a L killer. Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 04, 2010 23:56 | #8 t.o.n.g. wrote in post #9539896 ditto. You''ll probably be able to fit a flash in there as well, and maybe another small prime. Anything after that, and you'll need a new bag, which is what i'm looking for now Thanks. I have a large crumpler backpack when I have more stuff. Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 04, 2010 23:57 | #9 silvrr wrote in post #9540355 I fit similar stuff in mine plus a flash. I assume the interior space is the same on a 22 and 20. Thanks. Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 04, 2010 23:59 | #10 Got Turbo? wrote in post #9543321 Mine works with 1D, 70-200 F4, 24-105 and a couple of flashes/triggers/filters. I can fit it in with my 70-200 attached, but it's so tight, it makes me uncomfortable. You won't be able to put your body with the 70-200 2.8 attached. All in all, great bag! I like this bag too. Do you think I can fit in the 70-200/2.8 IS attached vertically with the top divider lifted? Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2010 00:01 | #11 CxThree wrote in post #9543686 I just bought a 11.3 inch netbook and have looked at this bag for vacations. The compartment sounds like its only up to 10 inch netbook, but I have seen many bags where people were able to fit a larger notebook in than the ratings said. Anyone use this with a larger than 10 inch netbook or notebook? If so, this would be a good vacation bag for me for my upcoming trip to Mexico. It said it fits up to most 11.6'' netbook. I have a 10 inch so it will fit. Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johnlo Goldmember 1,113 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Feb 05, 2010 07:12 | #12 nonick wrote in post #9544632 Thanks. Good catch, it's not L but actaully a L killer. heheh. that is VERY true. Used to have it w/ my 40D. nonick wrote in post #9544653 I like this bag too. Do you think I can fit in the 70-200/2.8 IS attached vertically with the top divider lifted? yes, but i think the weight will move the camera around that way. the pad dividers are not built like a wall, they are very soft. i know the 30 or 33 or 32 (whatever the number is), that it will fit w/ the lense attached. johnlo photography :
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 06, 2010 18:55 | #13 Thank you all. I bought the bag already. Nice bag. Gear|Searching for 7DII, Buying 5DIII 35L II, 24-70 2.8L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ebeyonder Hatchling 2 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Sorry for bringing up an old thread, but will this bag fit a Canon 500D, 10-22, 24-105L, and 100-400L?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CxThree Senior Member 713 posts Joined May 2009 More info | Mar 01, 2010 13:27 | #15 The 3n1 22 is not fat at all. However, it will not carry your 100-400 unless you lose the personal items storage area in the top and restructure the dividers to try to accomodate that lens. Maybe the 3n1 33 would be an option? It holde the camera body with grip and a 70-200F2.8L attached. Canon EOS 5D MKIII, 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1389 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||