Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 05 Feb 2010 (Friday) 12:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Understanding Camera Profile

 
kitjv
Member
Avatar
238 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Oregon USA
     
Feb 05, 2010 12:55 |  #1

In my quest to better understand (at least a portion of ) the vast spectrum of color management, I continually hear about establishing a profile for the camera. Other than selecting either sRGB or RGB color space on my 400D, what else is involved?

Thank you for your help.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jeromego
Goldmember
Avatar
3,907 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Florida
     
Feb 05, 2010 13:01 |  #2

AdobeRGB.


Jerome
Gear List
Canon CPS Member
www.lightsandimages.co​m (external link)
facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jdumas
Senior Member
Avatar
382 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Jan 2008
Location: SLC, Utah
     
Feb 05, 2010 14:00 |  #3

jeromego wrote in post #9548027 (external link)
AdobeRGB.

camera profiles not color spaces.

I am interested in this also. subscribing


http://jdumas.smugmug.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AxxisPhoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,893 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 65
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Feb 05, 2010 14:08 |  #4

I know you are asking about the camera, but there are lot of color profiles in Photoshop.

IMAGE: http://smileys.on-my-web.com/repository/Confused/sorry.gif

Web: Erotiklab (external link)(NSFW)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
partsman
Member
210 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
     
Feb 05, 2010 14:36 |  #5

Are you talking about shooting the X-rite color checker with your camera and then using the Adobe or X-rite software to create a camera profile tuned to your specific sensor? If so, I've done that and it works pretty well. Theres a thread about that in the Raw,Post Processing section with examples etc.


Mark
50D l 350D l 70-200L f/2.8 IS l EFS 17-85 f4.0-5.6 l 50 f/1.4 l 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitjv
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
238 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Oregon USA
     
Feb 05, 2010 18:21 |  #6

partsman wrote in post #9548775 (external link)
Are you talking about shooting the X-rite color checker with your camera and then using the Adobe or X-rite software to create a camera profile tuned to your specific sensor? If so, I've done that and it works pretty well. Theres a thread about that in the Raw,Post Processing section with examples etc.


I'm not sure. sorry to sound so vague, but I'm just trying to get an understanding of profiling a camera.

Actually, I'll just move this discussion to the Raw, Post Processing forum.

Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Feb 05, 2010 20:25 |  #7

See:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=774903

or

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=602420

Kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Feb 06, 2010 06:25 |  #8

Profiling the camera is not something that many people do unless the demand for color accuracy is very stringent, as in product/catalog photography, for several reasons: A. It is only the first step in an entire workflow that is strictly color managed from camera to output medium, unless the output is also well profiled the system loses much of its validity. B. A profile is specific for a given light source and is therefore usually considered practical only in the controlled and repeatable lighting of a studio. C. It is meaningful only for RAW conversions, but every RAW converter comes with generic profiles for every camera model that it supports that, while not as accurate as a profile for an individual camera, are nowadays pretty good. In past years there was dissatisfaction with the profiles in ACR and LR, so these converters provided the interface to customize the profiles, but in newer versions of the software the canned profiles are much better.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitjv
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
238 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Oregon USA
     
Feb 06, 2010 08:50 as a reply to  @ tzalman's post |  #9

Thank you, tzalman. I must admit that when I read about camera profiling that it seemed like a logically theoretical step in the quest for the most exacting standards of color management. However, for a mere mortal like myself who dabbles in the art for my one enjoyment only, I suspect this is far from the most critical consideration in controlling color from camera to printer.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,012 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Understanding Camera Profile
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1040 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.