Canon 5D Mark III Rumors

Ah I miss stealthy ninja.. he would bring levity in this forum lol.

reprazent wrote in post #12278176
so you admit you guys are a bunch of crybabies?

Thats how I took it lol.

reprazent wrote in post #12278176
so you admit you guys are a bunch of crybabies?

I could care less about a 5D 3. Most won't even buy it if street price is over 3k.

Hey it will be cheaper than your M9 .

jdizzle wrote in post #12278553
I could care less about a 5D 3. Most won't even buy it if street price is over 3k.

maverick678 wrote in post #12278611
Hey it will be cheaper than your M9 .

True but, the AF has to be comparable to 1D AF.

jdizzle wrote in post #12278641
True but, the AF has to be comparable to 1D AF.

I would say the MF should exceed the M9 lol.

Too greedy

jdizzle wrote in post #12278641
True but, the AF has to be comparable to 1D AF.

Whoever posted the "550 is better than the 7D" comparison is making a specious argument if you follow through and make properly finished images.

Certainly no expert here but if I were designing cameras, I'd feel reasonably confident that people buying higher end cameras would be processing at a higher level as well. Maybe that's where the breakdown is occurring. Maybe there are more people buying "more camera" with less skill at crafting quality images.

The file (raw or jpeg) is only the beginning...

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #12278667
Whoever posted the "550 is better than the 7D" comparison is making a specious argument if you follow through and make properly finished images.

Certainly no expert here but if I were designing cameras, I'd feel reasonably confident that people buying higher end cameras would be processing at a higher level as well. Maybe that's where the breakdown is occurring. Maybe there are more people buying "more camera" with less skill at crafting quality images.

The file (raw or jpeg) is only the beginning...

I'm speechless, your basically saying Canon fudged the 7D in certain areas because people who spend more on a camera are better and more willing to spend more of their time post processing flaws that didn't have to be their in the first place!
Do you not see flaw in your logic there Diago?

reprazent wrote in post #12278176
so you admit you guys are a bunch of crybabies?

Call it what you like, but at least we open our mouths!
Too many submissive Diago's around here...

http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=D71fJa355EI

rhys216 wrote in post #12278715
I'm speechless, your basically saying Canon fudged the 7D in certain areas because people who spend more on a camera are better and more willing to spend more of their time post processing flaws that didn't have to be their in the first place!
Do you not see flaw in your logic there Diago?

Yeah, pretty much except you have it bassackwards...

I'm saying the 550 is fudged so new camera users get a higher initial level of satisfaction.

Eventually, as you improve your photography, develop a personal style and learn to become a photographer, you (probably) need less of an image crutch and can work more from scratch.

Different cameras do have different AA Filter strengths (Bayer Filter?) so there can be differences in sooc sharpness and definition.

"the 550 is fudged"? It stands to reason that someone who buys an entry level camera may as they progress in skill find they'd like the extra frills that a higher model can offer, but that doesn't mean the 550 was in any way fudged. It's a superb camera for the money, and many people don't regard it as a stepping stone but just use it as their main camera. And get superb images out of it.

rhys216 wrote in post #12278740
Call it what you like, but at least we open our mouths!
Too many submissive Diago's around here...

http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=D71fJa355EI

LMAO, you have got to be kidding me.

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #12278743
Yeah, pretty much except you have it bassackwards...

I'm saying the 550 is fudged so new camera users get a higher initial level of satisfaction.

Eventually, as you improve your photography, develop a personal style and learn to become a photographer, you (probably) need less of an image crutch and can work more from scratch.

Oh, and it's Diego, not Diago...

Lol, I honestly can't believe you didn't back down here, are you seriously going to argue that it's somehow good that Canon give you less even though you pay more!?
I guess this is why we see only newbs buy L glass huh?

It couldn't be that the 550D sensor is slightly newer than that of the 7D, so as such, Canon included some minor technological improvements, it had made since the 7D?

Thanks for the spell check by the way, but that's the only thing you got right unfortunatley.

peterbj7 wrote in post #12278778
"the 550 is fudged"? It stands to reason that someone who buys an entry level camera may as they progress in skill find they'd like the extra frills that a higher model can offer, but that doesn't mean the 550 was in any way fudged. It's a superb camera for the money, and many people don't regard it as a stepping stone but just use it as their main camera. And get superb images out of it.

But I see you're not one of them...