Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 28 Jun 2005 (Tuesday) 13:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

So the 300D doesn't have FEC? And that means...

 
Dubsta
Member
219 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Sydney, Canada
     
Jun 28, 2005 13:55 |  #1

That FEC won't work on my 300D with my 580EX?

I really need this to work, with doing lots of wedding photography, so does this mean I should run out and get the 20? And is FEC that much of a difference?

Also, this was my plan anyway, in the next couple of weeks pick up the 20D and keep the 300D as my back up along with having the 24-70L on the 20D and if I pick up the 70-200L have that on the 300D...

Also, I know this is rambling on, but are the batteries for the 300D and 20D the same?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,333 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Jun 28, 2005 14:15 |  #2

You can set FEC on the flash gun (+/- 3stops). You just can't do it on the 300D body. Since you have a 580EX this isn't a problem for you. If you had a 420EX it would be a pain.


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport (external link)/Canoe Polo (external link)/Other Stuff (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cmM
Goldmember
Avatar
5,705 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Chicago / San Francisco
     
Jun 28, 2005 14:30 |  #3

Yup
I use the 300d +550EX and use FEC all the time (on the flash).

I'd be dead in the water without FEC :-P;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Jun 28, 2005 15:19 |  #4

300D + Undutchable Hack = FEC capability
JUMP button brings up FEC


http://www.syeager.org​/300d/forum/index.php? (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David1943
Member
Avatar
237 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Leicestershire - England
     
Jun 29, 2005 11:42 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Flash Exposure Control was a major factor in my decision to afford a 550EX over a 420EX.

I don't want to install any of the hacks but my 550EX has given me FEC. As others have said, you'll need to adjust the setting on your 580EX, so look it up in the manual.

Regards, David :)


Regards, David

Canon black 300D with Grip, 18-55 Kit Lens, 28-300 Tamron XR Di LD, Canon 550EX Speedlight, Olympus C-720, Canon EOS600, 28-200 Sigma, Canon EOS1000F, 35-105 Canon.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Jun 29, 2005 12:02 as a reply to  @ David1943's post |  #6

David1943 wrote:
Flash Exposure Control was a major factor in my decision to afford a 550EX over a 420EX.

I don't want to install any of the hacks but my 550EX has given me FEC. As others have said, you'll need to adjust the setting on your 580EX, so look it up in the manual.

Regards, David :)

You might have a valid reason in not wanting to use the hack. My Sigma EF500 DG Super can also do on flash FEC, but its not a quick as doing it on the camera and there is nothing wrong with the hack. At first I was also hesitant to use the Hack, but with anticipation of getting the 1DMKII I didn't care so much about the camera so I went ahead and now I can wait a while longer maybe until the 1DMKII comes out. Its that much better.

Back to subject. TTL= Through The Lens metering
Now if the camera is doing the metering and telling the flash what to do. Why would I want the flash to make a compensation decison for me??? The whole point in TTL flash is to let one metering device to make the decision and send a command to the flash and then tell flash how strong and how long. Too many chefs spoils the stock.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
booggerg
Senior Member
Avatar
460 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jun 29, 2005 16:02 as a reply to  @ lostdoggy's post |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

If the camera is metering the scene, why can't the camera decide what level of flash output to use? why would we need to manually adjust the FEC? Whether it be on the camera or flash...


20D || EOS650 || 50 f/1.8 MKI || 17-40 f/4L || 70-200 f/4L || Sigma 35-135 f/3.5 || Yashica Electro 35 || Yashica Minister || Yashica Mat 124G || Hoga 120CFN || 420EX || Sekonic 306 || Panasonic DVX100 || Canon GL2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David1943
Member
Avatar
237 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Leicestershire - England
     
Jun 29, 2005 17:30 as a reply to  @ lostdoggy's post |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

lostdoggy wrote:
You might have a valid reason in not wanting to use the hack. My Sigma EF500 DG Super can also do on flash FEC, but its not a quick as doing it on the camera and there is nothing wrong with the hack. At first I was also hesitant to use the Hack, but with anticipation of getting the 1DMKII I didn't care so much about the camera so I went ahead and now I can wait a while longer maybe until the 1DMKII comes out. Its that much better.

Back to subject. TTL= Through The Lens metering
Now if the camera is doing the metering and telling the flash what to do. Why would I want the flash to make a compensation decison for me??? The whole point in TTL flash is to let one metering device to make the decision and send a command to the flash and then tell flash how strong and how long. Too many chefs spoils the stock.

If that were the case, ie., not necessary to on occasions manually adjust the output of the flash (Flash Exposure Compensation) why do so many people install the hack?

Before being too hard on me, please bear in mind that I'm an oldie who began his photography prior to the modern automatic innovations and, as such, I still like the feeling of security afforded me by being able to adjust manually. That's what I'm used to, so call me an old stick-in-the-mud if you want to :o

If auto settings work for you on every occasion, that is fine.

Regards, David :)


Regards, David

Canon black 300D with Grip, 18-55 Kit Lens, 28-300 Tamron XR Di LD, Canon 550EX Speedlight, Olympus C-720, Canon EOS600, 28-200 Sigma, Canon EOS1000F, 35-105 Canon.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidEB
Goldmember
Avatar
3,117 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
     
Jun 29, 2005 17:42 |  #9

If the camera metered the flash output perfectly every time you might not need FEC. Just like in Av mode if the camera was perfect you wouldn't need regular exposure compensation.

even then, you might want FEC ocassionally to adjust the relationship between ambient light and flash light (that is, use regular EC to increase background exposure and FEC to decrease foreground exposure or vice-versa).


David
my stuff - [URL="http://www.pbase​.com/davideb"]my gallery - [URL="http://photograp​hy-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=3928125&postcou​nt=1"]go Rats!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 29, 2005 18:39 as a reply to  @ booggerg's post |  #10

booggerg wrote:
If the camera is metering the scene, why can't the camera decide what level of flash output to use? why would we need to manually adjust the FEC? Whether it be on the camera or flash...

This comes down to how cameras meter a scene. It assumes every scene is a mix of dark and light that comes to 18% grey (it sees in B&W for this). If your scene is very dark it'll make it look too bright. If your scene is very bright it'll pull down the brightness to 18%. FEC (and EC when a flash isn't being used) adjusts the target for the metering to higher or lower than 18%. For a scene with a lot of white you'll need FEC of +1 to +2, for a dark scene the opposite - though sometimes less so. Experiment, it's the only way to learn this black art.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Jun 29, 2005 20:32 as a reply to  @ David1943's post |  #11

David1943 wrote:
If that were the case, ie., not necessary to on occasions manually adjust the output of the flash (Flash Exposure Compensation) why do so many people install the hack?

Before being too hard on me, please bear in mind that I'm an oldie who began his photography prior to the modern automatic innovations and, as such, I still like the feeling of security afforded me by being able to adjust manually. That's what I'm used to, so call me an old stick-in-the-mud if you want to :o

If auto settings work for you on every occasion, that is fine.

Regards, David :)

I too started photography when in camera metering was a luxury. My first camera was a old Pentax with a screw mount lens and no in camera metering. Being a kid with very little resource I learned to take picture by eye. But that was a long time ago and if you ask me to do it now I wouldn't be able to, just too old. But I must say I learned alot back then and I hope todays kids could learn it the same way. Unfortunately todays teachers don't share that philosophy with me. They point out that it is better to let the camera do its magic and spend more time in composition. I think they missed the point that part of the composition is the lighting.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Jun 29, 2005 20:41 as a reply to  @ booggerg's post |  #12

booggerg wrote:
If the camera is metering the scene, why can't the camera decide what level of flash output to use?

Not all of my subjects are 18% gray. In fact, none of them are. But that's what the metering system assumes, so sometimes you need to compensate, with or without flash.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Jun 29, 2005 21:20 as a reply to  @ booggerg's post |  #13

booggerg wrote:
If the camera is metering the scene, why can't the camera decide what level of flash output to use? why would we need to manually adjust the FEC? Whether it be on the camera or flash...

Not all scenes are perfectly lit. The difference in lightlevel, dynamic range, might not fall in your favor. By using FEC you can balance the dark area you want more light and lit area less light. This is usually the case in fill flash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bauerman
discount on value meals
3,457 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Idaho!
     
Jun 29, 2005 21:27 |  #14

FEC is THE best reason for using one of he hacks.........for sure.............




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
happy ­ warrior
Hatchling
Avatar
6 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Nuneaton. U.K.
     
Jul 04, 2005 06:39 as a reply to  @ bauerman's post |  #15

Chris Breeze's Downloader Pro alows you to change the FEC for the inbuilt flash whilst the camera is conected to a computer, you can set it, and then shoot with that FEC setting.

Not ideal as you need a computer to change back again. But if you only intend to use one setting, it is a workaround.

Happy Warrior


EOS 20D/BG-E2
EOS 300D/BG-E1

Canon 50mm f1.8 mk2
Canon 17-40mmf4L
Canon 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS

Canon EX550
P.O.T.N. pro loop and E1 straps.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,941 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
So the 300D doesn't have FEC? And that means...
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1278 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.