Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 09 Feb 2010 (Tuesday) 18:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Curious about paper

 
TaDa
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Feb 09, 2010 18:32 |  #1

I'm curious what you guys use for inkjet photo paper. I use Kodak pro, but am not overly enthused with it.

Recommendations for both matte and glossy would be appreciated.

Also, surprised that nothing showed up in a search.


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DCBB ­ Photography
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,158 posts
Gallery: 478 photos
Likes: 20806
Joined Nov 2008
Location: North GA
     
Feb 09, 2010 19:04 |  #2

I think you'll find some discussion in the presentation section of the forum, but I use Ilford and Hahnmule(sp?) exclusively. What research and testing I've done led me to those two. Some of it depends on what type ink you're using (pigment or dye).

I have a printer that uses dyes (Canon Pro 9000) so for glossy paper I use Ilford's Classic Gloss. I haen't used much of the Hahnmulhe yet so can't tell you a lot about that.. but I like the samples I've used.


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
THREAD ­ STARTER
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Feb 09, 2010 19:18 |  #3

I searched there, but almost all of the threads there are about professional roll paper for pro printers. I have a simple pixma 620 and am just looking for some good paper to print out proofs on. The rest of my printing will continue to be with a lab.

When I just searched for inkjet paper or 8.5x11 paper, it just showed me a couple threads that had never been replied to.

So, thanks for the reply :) I also think that paper should be an accessory discussion as so many folks talk about printers in here. Well, you need something to feed into them :)


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DCBB ­ Photography
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,158 posts
Gallery: 478 photos
Likes: 20806
Joined Nov 2008
Location: North GA
     
Feb 09, 2010 19:29 |  #4

TaDa wrote in post #9577610 (external link)
I searched there, but almost all of the threads there are about professional roll paper for pro printers. I have a simple pixma 620 and am just looking for some good paper to print out proofs on. The rest of my printing will continue to be with a lab.

When I just searched for inkjet paper or 8.5x11 paper, it just showed me a couple threads that had never been replied to.

So, thanks for the reply :) I also think that paper should be an accessory discussion as so many folks talk about printers in here. Well, you need something to feed into them :)

lol.. ok. I'd suggest getting some 8.5x11 Ilford Gallerie Classic Gloss. You can't go wrong with it. There are other good ones as well, and maybe even a little cheaper. I think Red River makes a good paper as well but haven't used it.

Just make sure you download the printer profile for the paper, which Ilford has on their website. That will make your color reproduction better. Sounds like you just want to be able to print a few shots to get an idea..so that should be enough. If you get real serious about it you need to look into monitor and perhaps even printer calibration to keep colors consistent throughout the process.. but that's a DEEP subject and it doesn't sound like you're interested in getting that deep.


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
THREAD ­ STARTER
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Feb 09, 2010 19:52 |  #5

Monitor is calibrated, and just got the printer today. Main use will be just to print small proofs for customers. I've mainly been doing it by CD, but it's nice to be able to just hand some physical proofs to a customer to get a good idea of what a print would look like.

I prefer to use labs like Adorama's, because their prices and convenience become hard to beat for the awesome final product that they produce.

The Ilford at $90 for 250 sheets sounds like a pretty decent price point since I'd be getting between 4-6 shots on to a page.


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jklewer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,292 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: 34N 118W
     
Feb 09, 2010 20:06 |  #6

Kirkland photo paper from Costco. Awesome paper and dirt cheap, may be manufactured by Kodak though, something to look into.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Feb 09, 2010 22:33 |  #7

I have been trying Red River lately. So far, just the matte. Like it. Good .icc profiles.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Feb 09, 2010 22:41 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

epson 5 star luster here,

Tried many types and went back to it everytime...i cant tell the difference between it and kodak e-surface with luster coating. This is high quality stuff considering what you pay.


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Feb 10, 2010 04:54 |  #9

TaDa wrote in post #9577610 (external link)
I have a simple pixma 620 and am just looking for some good paper to print out proofs on.

Use whatever paper you can find .icc profiles for. Probably will be Canon.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
THREAD ­ STARTER
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Feb 10, 2010 05:21 |  #10

A sub-forum with "Printing" in the name. Duh. Someone really needs to give me a tour of the place one of these days :).

Now back to the help:

Problem was, when I printed out a picture, that had someone's head in it, the print put a huge black blot in the head and revealed no detail. Essentially looked like someone colored in a big part the hair with a sharpie. I used the sample 4x6 paper that came with the printer, and the same print is much better. Not perfect as the black is still a touch blotchy, but much much better.

Is there some way of configuring the printer to not print as much black or something to make it keep detail of the dark areas better? Or is this one of the weaknesses of a cheaper printer? Does higher end paper help prevent this type of bleed? Is there a way to differentiate which paper works better for dye based printers? How does one apply a .icc profile to a printer? I don't see anywhere in the printer settings to do it.

I really appreciate the help folks!


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
THREAD ­ STARTER
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Feb 10, 2010 06:12 |  #11

There are 8 profiles in Lightroom for my printer:

MP620 GL2/SG2, GL3/SG3, MP2, PR1, PR2, PR3, PT2 and PT3. Can anyone enlighten me as to the differences? and If I select one of those, would I use relative or perceptual for my rendering intent?


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poloman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
     
Feb 10, 2010 09:39 |  #12

TaDa wrote in post #9580318 (external link)
There are 8 profiles in Lightroom for my printer:

MP620 GL2/SG2, GL3/SG3, MP2, PR1, PR2, PR3, PT2 and PT3. Can anyone enlighten me as to the differences? and If I select one of those, would I use relative or perceptual for my rendering intent?

The numbers following the letters is a quality designation.
I have a file from Canon for icc profiles. It does not contain the letters you have.
GL = Glossy
MP = Matte
PR = Photo Rag?
PT = Photo ?
You need to experiment with the relative and perceptual to see what works best with a particular paper/ profile. Generally, it will be obvious.
Go to this web site
http://www.usa.canon.c​om/home (external link)
Select downloads and choose your operating system. Perhaps you can find some useful information there.


"All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my right hand!" Steven Wright

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
asysin2leads
I'm kissing arse
Avatar
6,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lebanon, OH
     
Feb 10, 2010 09:54 as a reply to  @ poloman's post |  #13

I have the Epson R-280 and have great success w/ Kodak papers. I've also used Epson and HP papers in a pinch, but Kodak has been our paper of choice.


Kevin
https://www.google.com ….com&ctz=Americ​a/New_York (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TaDa
THREAD ­ STARTER
...as cool as Perry
Avatar
6,742 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: New York
     
Feb 10, 2010 10:05 |  #14

I think that much of this has to do more with the profiles in Lightroom than with the paper. Just experimenting, different profiles make the print look completely different. Not subtle, but completely different. Some of it looks like an ink blot test, others just makes the whole head of hair one big area of black, others are coming out much better. (The GL2 profile seems to be working)

I'm just running out of paper to keep testing with, and it's snowing like hell outside and I can't run out for more :)

One question that I do have is about dpi. I read somewhere through searching through Rene's thread, that 300 dpi is assuming a print size that's rather small. So in Lightroom, I have 300 dpi for a 4x6 print and it's coming out okay. Would decreasing or increasing that number help?

Man, I haven't felt like such a noob in forever.


Name is Peter and here is my gear:
Canon 5D II, Canon 7D, Canon 40D
Glass - Zeiss 21 f/2.8 ZE, Canon 35 f/1.4L, Canon 40 f/2.8 STM, Canon 24-70 f/2.8
L, Canon 85 f/1.2L II, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 500 f/4L IS
Speedlite 580ex II, 430ex - Gitzo GT-3541XLS w/ Arca B1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Feb 10, 2010 10:43 |  #15

ppi = pixels per inch.

A 1200x1800 pixel file will print at 4x6 at 300 ppi or 8x12 at 150ppi.
The former will be good, the latter "okay-ish"

If you're working from the Raw files you should have a lot more pixels (unless you cropped the hell out of the image ;))

LR might be a bit confusing, since it scales the image to what you tell it to in the print module. Photoshop will not enlarge the image unless you tell it to, LR will auto resize to fit the paper.

For instance: Here is what the Library module tells me about an image (cropped severely for illustration purposes)

IMAGE: http://img.skitch.com/20100210-86h83fxjitbjhm4jagwi31ihw1.jpg

If I print that to an A4, it will look like crap, whatever ppi I set, since LR will interpolate the image from 145x217 pixels (see screenshot 1) to about 2800 x 3900 pixels (image size x print resolution set, so in this case 7,7 x 360 and 10,8 x 360)

IMAGE: http://img.skitch.com/20100210-ewfx13b6rs9rrtd6d78rfa44em.jpg


Make sure your image contains enough pixels to get at least 200 to 300 ppi.
Then set the print resolution to 360(720)ppi for Epson printers, or 300ppi for Canon printers (that's their "native resolution" IIRC)

"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,151 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Curious about paper
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1024 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.