Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner 
Thread started 09 Feb 2010 (Tuesday) 22:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Critique please

 
qwerty11
Member
51 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Feb 09, 2010 22:13 |  #1

Some shots I took. Would appreciate the help.

IMAGE: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2695/4317710155_4401ded7d0_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4038/4317710249_f766be074c_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4028/4318446892_85387bcd87_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4067/4318446972_4fe039629a_b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
midnight_rider
"Thrown under the bus."
Avatar
5,413 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Yonder by the crick, Ga
     
Feb 09, 2010 22:20 |  #2

The first one has something in the bottom of the frame that I would crop out and seems like it is leaning just a little to the left. Also I would clone or crop out the parking signs,
The second one is just very distracting. The last 2 are great, maybe a little tighter crop on both though. The last image has a group of trees that is lit up and I keep looking down towards them.


I never, Not once claimed to read your post...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cameramonger
Member
98 posts
Joined Feb 2010
     
Feb 09, 2010 22:36 |  #3

The first one seemed too symmetrical for me. It would nicer to have the church off centre with something balancing it. I liked the second one a lot better, however to me it is more a mood picture or scenesetter than a picture of a specific place. If your objective was the church, the palm tree along side and framing it would have been perfect, if you could get to the right spot to take it. The third picture is beautifully composed, and the fourth one is pleasing as well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ferretkingdom
"open mouth, insert foot"
Avatar
447 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Florida
     
Feb 10, 2010 02:52 |  #4

One the 1st One, i'd crop out about 1/2 of the grass in the foreground so the church is lower in the frame and not quite so.... centered i guess.

The 2nd one I'm iffy on. I like the light reflection on the branches of the tree, but find looking through it a bit distracting at the same time.

The 3rd - personally i think the building on the left is distracting, so I would crop it square. I love the night scene and light trails

4th is my fave. I might crop out some of the foreground at the bottom, as there's a lot of black there, but definitely my favorite.


Gripped T1i and lots of other Gear

Photos Here (external link) and Here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,865 posts
Gallery: 269 photos
Likes: 792
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
Feb 10, 2010 03:58 |  #5

All four are nice shots - sharp well exposed and interesting. Previous posters have already commented on some aspects. The second one is interesting and it depends on what you want with the image: if you want to show the church then the first one is better. If you want a "mood" shot then the second one is very good.

There is no EXIF info available but I am under the impression that - especially in the first shot - you picked a fairly high ISO value because I notice some noise in the sky. Would have been interesting to know the shooting conditions here. These night shots are best at low ISO and long exposure times.


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
5D MkIV 5DMkIII, 50D, 24-105/1:4L IS USM + 100-400/4-5.6L IS USM + 50mm 1.4 USM + Tamron 70-200mm F/2.8 VC + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + 580EXII + 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vpnd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,483 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: nd
     
Feb 10, 2010 09:44 |  #6

2nd to last is cool.... level horizon please.


Canon "Snappy".... Thanks Mom and Dad!
"I don't like to play dress up, or pet my gear. I like to shoot stuff and then print it and put it on my wall."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjc1
Senior Member
Avatar
553 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Ohio
     
Feb 10, 2010 11:50 |  #7

Other than the already mentioned nit pics, I like them all. Nice job.


40D with 28-135 IS , Tamron 17-50 ,100-400 f4.5-5.6L, 100mm f2.8L macro IS, 430EX, 430EXll,MiniTT1/FlexTT​5 , Kata R-103,
Domke F2 shooters bag

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StudioAbe
BAAAAAAN!!!
Avatar
1,931 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 1000
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Westchester County, NY
     
Feb 10, 2010 12:04 as a reply to  @ rjc1's post |  #8

I don't mind the first shot with the building being on center - the subject matter is symmetrical to begin with so locating the centerline of the building smack on the center of the frame emphasizes the symmetry. I agree that the parking sign and cover plate in the foreground (irrigation valve?) could be cropped or cloned out.

It reminded me of this famous picture from architecture:

http://info.aia.org …e_vanna_venturi​_house.jpg (external link)


perhaps one way to break up the symmetry within the symmetrical composition is to introduce something in the frame without altering it's composition, as in the example above, which is the figure of the architect's mother.

What if you recompose the second to last one so that it's portrait orientation with only the leftmost 1/3 of the frame? As it currently stands, the opening through the balconies is of tertiary interest and its impact not immediately recognizable.



If it's in focus, it's pornography, if it's out of focus, it's art.
EOS R & 5DsR | + gear | StudioAbe (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

720 views & 0 likes for this thread
Critique please
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is rono258
877 guests, 234 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.