Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
Thread started 11 Feb 2010 (Thursday) 00:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Junior, how many times do I have to tell you to comb

 
Jack ­ Cooper
Goldmember
2,374 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2009
     
Feb 11, 2010 00:40 |  #1

1/1250, f/5.6, ISO 800, 400mm, 7D, 100-400mm, range 50yds, 400mm, overcast. Very close deer family, they where very attentive to each other.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andy0483
Member
41 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: New york
     
Feb 11, 2010 07:23 |  #2

great capture of how the mother deer takes care of her babies


A good picture comes from within you , not your camera:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WherzRoony
Senior Member
250 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 29
Joined Sep 2007
     
Feb 11, 2010 13:30 |  #3

Mama deer could use a little grooming as well, It looks like she's covered in ticks. In the north east US this year, it was a BAD year for ticks. My dogs and cats were constantly getting them, when in years past, none.


Feel free to use any photo's that I post for any purpose that I don't find offensive. I'd be honored to find my pics used on that world wide web thingy....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jack ­ Cooper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,374 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2009
     
Feb 11, 2010 18:49 |  #4

They are probably not ticks. Rather they are little seed stickers. I would not bet on it though. But my socks had a few in them this morning.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rich_A
Member
Avatar
91 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Montana
     
Feb 11, 2010 23:07 as a reply to  @ Jack Cooper's post |  #5

Great shot, Jack. I noticed the photos looks great at ISO 800 on that 7D of yours. Do you find it has a ceiling of acceptable noise for overcast shots like this?

Wonderful moment to capture. Congrats!


Rich
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jack ­ Cooper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,374 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2009
     
Feb 12, 2010 00:40 |  #6

You are talking over my head. I'll answer what i think you are asking. I can reduce the noise to an acceptable level in processing. The camera makes a lot of noise if it is not micro adjusted correctly. I know that sounds odd. But for me it is the truth. I'm one of those people who learn by doing, I think i;m getting better, but I'm shooting a lot. Only about 3 1/2 months of experience. But jam packed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rich_A
Member
Avatar
91 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Montana
     
Feb 12, 2010 09:57 as a reply to  @ Jack Cooper's post |  #7

Jack, that makes sense. Noise is always more pronounced in out-of-focus mid-tones such as background trees or other objects. High contrast scenes (those shot on sunny days for example) have greater contrast and thus more brightly lit and shadowed areas (where noise is less of an issue) than shots taken on overcast days when everything can be mid-toned (like your shot here). That was the basis of the question, sorry for not making myself clear. I find that my 50D performs perfectly well up to around ISO 400-640 but then starts to reveal some warts in mid-tones above that. It sounds like the 7D also performs pretty well.

Congrats on the photo. This is a great shot. You should make use of those 18MP and print it.


Rich
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jack ­ Cooper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,374 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2009
     
Feb 12, 2010 10:14 |  #8

Lots of cloudy days. Had a sunny day then guessed wrong and drove over the mountain to a cloudy area. I really think that the 7D is good about noise up to about 1600. It is hard for me to tell because I have such a small kwowledge base. I am wondering if the 100-400mm I have is "sharp" I wonder if any 100-400 is capable of getting truly "sharp" My problem could and probably is operator error.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,180 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Junior, how many times do I have to tell you to comb
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2669 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.