1/1250, f/5.6, ISO 800, 400mm, 7D, 100-400mm, range 50yds, 400mm, overcast. Very close deer family, they where very attentive to each other.
JackCooper Goldmember 2,374 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2009 More info | Feb 11, 2010 00:40 | #1 |
andy0483 Member 41 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: New york More info | Feb 11, 2010 07:23 | #2 great capture of how the mother deer takes care of her babies A good picture comes from within you , not your camera
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 11, 2010 13:30 | #3 Mama deer could use a little grooming as well, It looks like she's covered in ticks. In the north east US this year, it was a BAD year for ticks. My dogs and cats were constantly getting them, when in years past, none. Feel free to use any photo's that I post for any purpose that I don't find offensive. I'd be honored to find my pics used on that world wide web thingy....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 11, 2010 18:49 | #4 They are probably not ticks. Rather they are little seed stickers. I would not bet on it though. But my socks had a few in them this morning.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rich_A Member 91 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Montana More info | Great shot, Jack. I noticed the photos looks great at ISO 800 on that 7D of yours. Do you find it has a ceiling of acceptable noise for overcast shots like this? Rich
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 12, 2010 00:40 | #6 You are talking over my head. I'll answer what i think you are asking. I can reduce the noise to an acceptable level in processing. The camera makes a lot of noise if it is not micro adjusted correctly. I know that sounds odd. But for me it is the truth. I'm one of those people who learn by doing, I think i;m getting better, but I'm shooting a lot. Only about 3 1/2 months of experience. But jam packed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rich_A Member 91 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Montana More info | Jack, that makes sense. Noise is always more pronounced in out-of-focus mid-tones such as background trees or other objects. High contrast scenes (those shot on sunny days for example) have greater contrast and thus more brightly lit and shadowed areas (where noise is less of an issue) than shots taken on overcast days when everything can be mid-toned (like your shot here). That was the basis of the question, sorry for not making myself clear. I find that my 50D performs perfectly well up to around ISO 400-640 but then starts to reveal some warts in mid-tones above that. It sounds like the 7D also performs pretty well. Rich
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 12, 2010 10:14 | #8 Lots of cloudy days. Had a sunny day then guessed wrong and drove over the mountain to a cloudy area. I really think that the 7D is good about noise up to about 1600. It is hard for me to tell because I have such a small kwowledge base. I am wondering if the 100-400mm I have is "sharp" I wonder if any 100-400 is capable of getting truly "sharp" My problem could and probably is operator error.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2669 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||