Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 30 Jun 2005 (Thursday) 10:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

EF-S 10-22 or Sigma 10-20?

 
syburn
Member
192 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Singapore
     
Jun 30, 2005 10:35 |  #1

Hi,

I plan to take interior photographs and i am wondering if I should use the canon 10-22 or the Sigma 10-20. Would take the canon but the 1x6 crop factor is making me think of the future. Would take the sigma if I did not keep reading not so great reviews.

Hmmmm.. what to do?


My good old 350D
ES-F 10-22mm Lens, ES-F 17-85mm Lens
Manfrotto 055CX3 Tripod, Manfrotto 410 Geared Head
L Bracket
Cable Release

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Jun 30, 2005 10:37 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

If you want a lens that'll work properly and mount on a full frame camera - Your only choice is the Sigma 12-24.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Skippy29
Goldmember
Avatar
1,100 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Oceanside, California
     
Jun 30, 2005 11:20 as a reply to  @ Hellashot's post |  #3

And if that is not an issue, the Canon is your only choice.


"I'm like a Slinky - not much good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see me tumble down the stairs" -iKirst

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wolverine27
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined May 2005
     
Jun 30, 2005 14:34 |  #4

syburn wrote:
Hi,

I plan to take interior photographs and i am wondering if I should use the canon 10-22 or the Sigma 10-20. Would take the canon but the 1x6 crop factor is making me think of the future. Would take the sigma if I did not keep reading not so great reviews.

Hmmmm.. what to do?

Where are these "not so great reviews" of the Sigma 10-20 that you speak of?

Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Jun 30, 2005 14:36 |  #5

There isn't much on the 10-20 but initial comments seem very promising. For example:

http://scott.greiff.or​g/stories/storyReader$​200 (external link)

Also, Sigma4less has the 30 f1.4 EX now for $399.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wolverine27
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined May 2005
     
Jun 30, 2005 15:11 as a reply to  @ LightRules's post |  #6

fStopJojo wrote:
There isn't much on the 10-20 but initial comments seem very promising. For example:

http://scott.greiff.or​g/stories/storyReader$​200 (external link)

Also, Sigma4less has the 30 f1.4 EX now for $399.

Thanks for the link. I agree, initial comments seem very promising. I was just curious where syburn has seen the "not so great" reviews of the Sigma 10-20.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
syburn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
192 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Singapore
     
Jun 30, 2005 19:20 |  #7

Well, I read an article on the net were they show an enlarged shot from both the 10-22 and the 12-24. THe Sigmas is blurred and not clear and the reviewer says that people have complained about Sigma lens in the past (I'm at work now so I can get to my Favourites folder to find the article).

So what some of you are hinting at that a Sigma is every bit as good as a canon?

Because the only thing that is holding me back from spending money is the 1.6 crop issue or is it really an issue?

Cheers - Simon


My good old 350D
ES-F 10-22mm Lens, ES-F 17-85mm Lens
Manfrotto 055CX3 Tripod, Manfrotto 410 Geared Head
L Bracket
Cable Release

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wolverine27
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined May 2005
     
Jun 30, 2005 20:39 as a reply to  @ syburn's post |  #8

syburn wrote:
Well, I read an article on the net were they show an enlarged shot from both the 10-22 and the 12-24. THe Sigmas is blurred and not clear and the reviewer says that people have complained about Sigma lens in the past (I'm at work now so I can get to my Favourites folder to find the article).

So what some of you are hinting at that a Sigma is every bit as good as a canon?

Because the only thing that is holding me back from spending money is the 1.6 crop issue or is it really an issue?

Cheers - Simon

Hello Simon,

I think there's some confusion going on here...your original post refers to the Sigma 10-20 which has yet to be released. In the following post, hellashot refers to the Sigma 12-24.

I was asking about reviews for the 10-20 and not the 12-24. We'll have to wait patiently for the 10-20 to arrive before we can make any judgements on that lens. As for the 12-24...it is your only choice if your want a lens for use with FF sensor.

I'm looking for a wide angle lens and am considering the Canon 10-22, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 12-24, Tamron 11-18, and the Tokina 12-24. I've played with the Sigma 12-24 and Tamron 11-18. Both good lenses in my opinion. The Tokina I have not used personally, but have heard many good things about it.

Right now, I'm leaning towards the Canon 10-22 and the Sigma 10-20 because of the wide end. My reasoning is if I'm going to go wide, I might as well go wide ;) Unfortnately, I can't make a decision until the Sigma 10-20 arrives.

At this point in time, I'm not hinting that the Sigma 10-20 is every bit as good as the Canon 10-22...but I am saying that we have to wait and see. I would have no problem buying the Sigma if image quality is good. In the meantime, I'll just have to continue waiting and waiting... :rolleyes:

Regards,
Wolverine




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,808 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
EF-S 10-22 or Sigma 10-20?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1373 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.