Hi,
Anyone have any interior shots taken with the above lens, I'm trying to see if this will be wide enough for me to photograph rooms for show houses and offices spaces etc.
Cheers - simon
syburn Member 192 posts Joined Jun 2005 Location: Singapore More info | Jun 30, 2005 10:40 | #1 Hi, My good old 350D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gerolamo Member 80 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2004 More info | Jun 30, 2005 11:44 | #2 It will be wide enough. I don't have any samples (at work) but you can capture a small room (6x6 ft) from the dooray. Canon 20D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheObiJuan Member 227 posts Joined May 2005 More info | Jun 30, 2005 11:52 | #3 This is not my picture, I don't remember who photographed it. It was on FM and since it is for educational purposes, here you go. My thanks to the photographer for spending the time to do this!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Glyyde Member 191 posts Joined Jun 2005 More info | Jun 30, 2005 11:58 | #4 with a 1.6x crop factor.... the 10-22mm lens can only do 16mm isn't it? 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ddelallata Goldmember  1,191 posts Joined May 2005 Location: Brownsville, Tx USA More info | Glyyde wrote: with a 1.6x crop factor.... the 10-22mm lens can only do 16mm isn't it? yes.. but the above picture shows how wide it really is because it was taken on an EF-S camera. Dr. David de la Llata
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Duder Goldmember  1,201 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: L.A. formerly N Ireland More info | Jun 30, 2005 12:17 | #6 holy crap, the difference between the 18-55 and the 10-22 is enormous. I hadn't realised it would be so substantially wider. Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ToddJacobsen Senior Member 704 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: Colorado More info | Duder wrote: holy crap, the difference between the 18-55 and the 10-22 is enormous. I hadn't realised it would be so substantially wider. At the low end it's almost double. Todd Jacobsen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jesterfromfev Hatchling 6 posts Joined Jun 2005 More info | Jun 30, 2005 15:33 | #8 Its fantastic, I use the lense to photograph inside and out on architectural surveys as well as landscape for pleasure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Glyyde Member 191 posts Joined Jun 2005 More info | Jun 30, 2005 16:20 | #9 how did u know tat the pic shown is of ef-s lens? meaning the pics has to be 1.6x crop already then?> 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chtgrubbs Goldmember 1,675 posts Joined Jul 2003 More info | Jun 30, 2005 18:03 | #10 If you can't do it with the 10-22 then the only alternative is to go to a body with a larger sensor like the 1D Mk II or 1Ds.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sean-Mcr Goldmember  1,813 posts Likes: 4 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Manchester, England More info | Jun 30, 2005 18:58 | #11 Well the 10-22 wont fit on a full frame so it must have been on a 1.6 I don't know what good composition is.... Sometimes for me composition has to do with a certain brightness or a certain coming to restness and other times it has to do with funny mistakes. There's a kind of rightness and wrongness and sometimes I like rightness and sometimes I like wrongness. Diane Arbus
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 30, 2005 19:12 | #12 WOW! That picture is incredible, thanks for your response. Seems a load of other people also enjoyed seeing that as much as me. My good old 350D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
felix21685 Goldmember  1,371 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Arizona More info | Jun 30, 2005 19:15 | #13 good picture to visualize .. ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1374 guests, 159 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
