Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 17 Feb 2010 (Wednesday) 18:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Spherical Panorama?

 
Simply ­ Ravishing
Goldmember
Avatar
1,036 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Seattle, Washington
     
Feb 17, 2010 18:19 |  #1

Any idea how these are done??? Kinda cool

http://www.utah3d.net/​index.html#top_of_page (external link)



http://justinkraemerph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/justinkraemer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sparkin
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,522 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Lex, Ky
     
Feb 17, 2010 18:30 |  #2

Simply Ravishing wrote in post #9629625 (external link)
Any idea how these are done??? Kinda cool

http://www.utah3d.net/​index.html#top_of_page (external link)

You need to have enough contiguous pictures to cover the whole 360° around, up and down. These are stitched with one of many programs (PTGui, Hugin, PTMac etc. etc.). The format of the final file may depend to some extent on what you intend to use as a viewer, but I usually use a free program called MakeCubic along with PTMac. The site you link to looks as if it used a program called Pleinpot to make the full-screen views.

Most often the pictures used are taken by rotating the camera about the point that minimizes parallax errors, using a special tripod head. You can buy these, or even make them yourself. Here's a couple of examples that I made:

http://xray.uky.edu …in/panohead/pan​ohead.html (external link)

http://xray.uky.edu …head_mk2/panohe​ad_2_4.jpg (external link)

The first one is solid as a rock, and the link has a description of the build. The second is smaller, lighter, more adjustable and has a smaller footprint, but is slightly less rigid. I use the smaller one mainly on a monopod now. Elsewhere on my site there's a few of my 360° panos.

It's a lot of fun, and really not that difficult - you should give it a try.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kingdaddy
Senior Member
Avatar
396 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Fort Worth
     
Feb 17, 2010 19:29 |  #3

Why do you need all that to do 360°? Why not a simple pan head and an L-bracket?


6D | 7D | XSI | EF-S 10-22 | EF 50 1.4 | EF 24-105L | 100-400L │ EF-100mm Macro| MT-24EX │580 EXII | Black Rapid RS-5 | lots of Think Tank.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sparkin
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,522 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Lex, Ky
     
Feb 17, 2010 20:45 |  #4

kingdaddy wrote in post #9629953 (external link)
Why do you need all that to do 360°? Why not a simple pan head and an L-bracket?

It makes it much easier to get a seamless stitch. If there is anything up close in the foreground, and you don't rotate precisely about the no-parallax point, then it can be hours of work to join the images seamlessly. This is especially true if you use a fisheye lens to minimize the number of images you need. If you have a well-functioning panohead, and a properly calibrated lens, then it's often an easy ten minute job. I learned this the hard way! Also, I'm cheap, which is why I made my own panohead.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kingdaddy
Senior Member
Avatar
396 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Fort Worth
     
Mar 07, 2010 16:06 |  #5

Well I'm on-board now, thanks for the info, I've built my own DIY pano setup. Couldn't stomach the price of the RSS system.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=833187


6D | 7D | XSI | EF-S 10-22 | EF 50 1.4 | EF 24-105L | 100-400L │ EF-100mm Macro| MT-24EX │580 EXII | Black Rapid RS-5 | lots of Think Tank.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,340 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Spherical Panorama?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2581 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.