This is a photo chosen by the Senior but the school needs to have a vertical crop with a 5x7 aspect ratio...I don't really want to cut off one of her feet...is this OK to do, or how would everyone else do it?
DD974 Senior Member 835 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2006 More info | Feb 18, 2010 07:14 | #1 This is a photo chosen by the Senior but the school needs to have a vertical crop with a 5x7 aspect ratio...I don't really want to cut off one of her feet...is this OK to do, or how would everyone else do it? DC~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mattaura Member 202 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Feb 18, 2010 07:55 | #2 fit the 5 x 7 so that is has her whole body in with extra space at top. because the top area is bokeh...you can easily make a selection up top to cover the new image area then use the clone tool set at approx 40% opacity with a big brush to make it seamless and natural. hope that makes sense. 400D | Sigma 105mm f2.8 EX Macro 1:1 Lens | 70-200mm F4 L | 18-55mm Kit Lens
LOG IN TO REPLY |
deathcake Senior Member 480 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Feb 18, 2010 08:19 | #3 ^^ Agreed, I really wouldn't crop the foot. Great shot, by the way! [gear][recent work
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2010 09:43 | #4 mattaura wrote in post #9632595 fit the 5 x 7 so that is has her whole body in with extra space at top. because the top area is bokeh...you can easily make a selection up top to cover the new image area then use the clone tool set at approx 40% opacity with a big brush to make it seamless and natural. hope that makes sense. Like this.... DC~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2010 09:44 | #5 deathcake wrote in post #9632683 ^^ Agreed, I really wouldn't crop the foot. Great shot, by the way! Thank you! DC~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yeah, I didn't like the missing foot at all!...I'm not sure I like all the headroom above the last image posted...only other thing to do would be to add more foreground in front of her hands. DC~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
recrisp Goldmember More info | Feb 18, 2010 10:24 | #7 If you think you like the second shot in your first post, and can handle a little Photoshop, you could clone out the leg and foot, that way you'd have the show you want.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2010 10:47 | #8 recrisp wrote in post #9633348 If you think you like the second shot in your first post, and can handle a little Photoshop, you could clone out the leg and foot, that way you'd have the show you want. Start cloning right above her buttocks, delete the legs and foot, and you have your shot. Her photo will be large enough to see then. Randy I thought about that option too...that way it'd appear her legs were straight. Thanks. DC~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2010 11:05 | #9 recrisp wrote in post #9633348 If you think you like the second shot in your first post, and can handle a little Photoshop, you could clone out the leg and foot, that way you'd have the show you want. Start cloning right above her buttocks, delete the legs and foot, and you have your shot. Her photo will be large enough to see then. Randy DC~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2010 12:43 | #11 recrisp wrote in post #9633910 It looks good that way actually. The cloning needs more work, but the idea of it looks good. (I'm assuming that you were doing a 'quickie' on it) ![]() Randy Yeah, that was a quik PS job! Thanks for the input. DC~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2010 12:56 | #12 recrisp wrote in post #9633910 It looks good that way actually. The cloning needs more work, but the idea of it looks good. (I'm assuming that you were doing a 'quickie' on it) ![]() Randy This looks better, eh? DC~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blackhawk Goldmember 1,785 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: East coast for now More info | Feb 18, 2010 12:59 | #13 Win. You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
LOG IN TO REPLY |
recrisp Goldmember More info | Feb 18, 2010 12:59 | #14 Yeah, a lot better, but when you do the real one, (if this isn't it) I'd have a leaf or two there just like the other side, not overpowering it, but just enough to make it balanced.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 18, 2010 13:05 | #15 recrisp wrote in post #9634321 Also, the hair seems to have been gosted sort of. I am pretty sure that you are doing a quickie just to show us, so I'm saying it 'just in case'. ![]() Randy Gotcha!...but actually I never touched the hair. But understood nonetheless. Thanks. DC~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1452 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||