Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 20 Feb 2010 (Saturday) 09:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Temple lantern & wedding company...

 
tonydee
Goldmember
Avatar
2,009 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Tokyo
     
Feb 20, 2010 09:55 |  #1

Feedback welcome. Both shots with 5D and 24-105mm f/4 IS.

f/4 1/60s 85mm ISO100


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



Stitched together from a couple shots at f/4 1/20s 80mm ISO400 no flash:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


(full size here (external link))

Cheers,
Tony

5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
http://www.picasaweb.c​om/anthonypon (external link) recent work

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deathcake
Senior Member
Avatar
480 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 23, 2010 04:12 |  #2

You captured a lot of detail in both shots, I like them. The lantern is nicely framed, and it's cool how you can see its shadow, but the shadows are not harsh.

In the wedding shop, good time of the day to capture this cause it's lit up from the inside, with warm light on the mannequins, and the area framing the window is still not too dark. Bit of car in bottom left hand corner is a little distracting, but no big deal. Guessing you had to stitch a few shots together because of traffic or people being in the way?

This shot would be great as an advertisement/brochure for the company. If that's the case, the woman in the suit inside the shop is also good, "friendly staff" etc :p


[gear][recent work (external link)][flickr (external link)] Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst. - Henri Cartier-Bresson

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonydee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,009 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Tokyo
     
Feb 23, 2010 04:31 |  #3

Seems we've been simultaneously but unknowingly trading critiques. Thanks for the feedback.

I was happy about the shadows in #1, but I don't like the bottom and right hand areas. I've tried a perspective correction and crop... wonder if it's better, or just looks wrong? Perspective corrections are a dangerous thing to attempt....


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


The wedding shop's a strange place. I have some shots without people or traffic - wasn't too busy - but I actually put the taxi light in deliberately. I guess my take on it was more cynical than yours - seeing the place as trying but failing to look inviting while the world passes it by ;). The headless mannequins, the tacky plastic figures on the cake. Guess I critique life as brutally as the images on here, hey? :-) I stitched together bits to get the lady standing up like that, the taxi, and the cinema's sign at right. I meant to include just the shadow of someone walking out of frame at left, but somehow I didn't merge the layers down right before saving - been too lazy to fix it.

Cheers,
Tony

5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
http://www.picasaweb.c​om/anthonypon (external link) recent work

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deathcake
Senior Member
Avatar
480 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 23, 2010 08:43 |  #4

I think the above crop works and the perspective change fooled me... had to open it up in photoshop as 2 layers to work out what you did.

tonydee wrote in post #9663949 (external link)
The wedding shop's a strange place. I have some shots without people or traffic - wasn't too busy - but I actually put the taxi light in deliberately. I guess my take on it was more cynical than yours - seeing the place as trying but failing to look inviting while the world passes it by ;). The headless mannequins, the tacky plastic figures on the cake. Guess I critique life as brutally as the images on here, hey? :-) I stitched together bits to get the lady standing up like that, the taxi, and the cinema's sign at right. I meant to include just the shadow of someone walking out of frame at left, but somehow I didn't merge the layers down right before saving - been too lazy to fix it.

Oh, that's quite an interesting perspective... now that I read your take on it and look at it again i see what you mean. I probably assumed cause most wedding stuff posted here is in a positive light =P I would have gone for a more spooky edit, but the subtle approach works, more interesting even. Headless mannequins really are kind of disturbing. Here (external link)'s my quick and not very good try at "obviously spooky", just for fun.


[gear][recent work (external link)][flickr (external link)] Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst. - Henri Cartier-Bresson

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonydee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,009 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Tokyo
     
Feb 23, 2010 10:40 |  #5

I'll run with the perspective-changed version then... thanks :-).

Love your spooky wedding shop take. Works in with being a short walk from a huge cemetery. Will have to show that to a friend who took an interest in the shot. His initial instinct was to make it warmer and welcoming too, but he picked up on some of the negative factor's (headlessness, tacky plastic figures on the left) that I'd not paid attention to. Sure he'd appreciate your take.

Thanks and regards,
Tony


5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
http://www.picasaweb.c​om/anthonypon (external link) recent work

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deathcake
Senior Member
Avatar
480 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 24, 2010 07:02 |  #6

Cool, glad you like it. I was afraid it would be one of those things that seems like a good idea at 2am but looks bad in hindsight, haha. It was well spotted of you and your friend to see that you could show the place as tacky and uninviting.


[gear][recent work (external link)][flickr (external link)] Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst. - Henri Cartier-Bresson

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,942 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Temple lantern & wedding company...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is rickldewitt
980 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.