Feedback welcome. Both shots with 5D and 24-105mm f/4 IS.
f/4 1/60s 85mm ISO100
Stitched together from a couple shots at f/4 1/20s 80mm ISO400 no flash:
(full size here

Cheers,
Tony
tonydee Goldmember ![]() 2,009 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Tokyo More info | Feb 20, 2010 09:55 | #1 Feedback welcome. Both shots with 5D and 24-105mm f/4 IS. Stitched together from a couple shots at f/4 1/20s 80mm ISO400 no flash: (full size here ![]() Cheers, Tony 5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
deathcake Senior Member ![]() 480 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Feb 23, 2010 04:12 | #2 You captured a lot of detail in both shots, I like them. The lantern is nicely framed, and it's cool how you can see its shadow, but the shadows are not harsh. [gear][recent work
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 23, 2010 04:31 | #3 Seems we've been simultaneously but unknowingly trading critiques. Thanks for the feedback. The wedding shop's a strange place. I have some shots without people or traffic - wasn't too busy - but I actually put the taxi light in deliberately. I guess my take on it was more cynical than yours - seeing the place as trying but failing to look inviting while the world passes it by ![]() ![]() Cheers, Tony 5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
deathcake Senior Member ![]() 480 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Feb 23, 2010 08:43 | #4 I think the above crop works and the perspective change fooled me... had to open it up in photoshop as 2 layers to work out what you did. tonydee wrote in post #9663949 ![]() The wedding shop's a strange place. I have some shots without people or traffic - wasn't too busy - but I actually put the taxi light in deliberately. I guess my take on it was more cynical than yours - seeing the place as trying but failing to look inviting while the world passes it by ![]() ![]() Oh, that's quite an interesting perspective... now that I read your take on it and look at it again i see what you mean. I probably assumed cause most wedding stuff posted here is in a positive light =P I would have gone for a more spooky edit, but the subtle approach works, more interesting even. Headless mannequins really are kind of disturbing. Here [gear][recent work
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 23, 2010 10:40 | #5 I'll run with the perspective-changed version then... thanks 5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
deathcake Senior Member ![]() 480 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Feb 24, 2010 07:02 | #6 Cool, glad you like it. I was afraid it would be one of those things that seems like a good idea at 2am but looks bad in hindsight, haha. It was well spotted of you and your friend to see that you could show the place as tacky and uninviting. [gear][recent work
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is rickldewitt 980 guests, 125 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |