Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 21 Feb 2010 (Sunday) 02:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1D1V and 500F4 IS

 
County ­ Man
Member
Avatar
227 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Scotland
     
Feb 21, 2010 02:38 |  #1

I have been a member of the forum for some time but don't post as I rarely can match the quality of the shots I see on this forum. However I an passionate about getting quality shots with my gear.
I have a 1D1V coupled to my 500F4 IS and connot seem to get sharp shots. I have micro adjusted to +10 at a target distance of about 15M and one shot at various distances seems ok but AI servo is just mush.
Its rare for us to get the blue sky weather I often see on this site so to get it the other day and a chance to shoot some kites was great but I was disapointed with the results. They looked great on the camera screen but poor on my monitor.
I feel I have taken all the neccessary steps to get in the sharp zone but I am a bit disheartened now.
However I am determined to get it right and would welcome some pointers to set me on the right track if you can spare the time.
I am happy to take your advice if offered without taking offence.
Thanks
M


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Feb 21, 2010 04:15 |  #2

M,

The first shot is not sharp, but theres nothing wrong with the second. Remember that AI Servo does not require focus confirmation to fire, so there will always be the occasional miss. With the clear sky background and the benefit of 20/20 hindsight I'd have used something like f/8 or f/11 to get a greater DoF especially given your cameras much improved ISO performance compared to mine.

You also need to bear in mind that we generally are shown only others best images, probably after suitable massaging in post processing. RAW shots straight from camera tend towards low contrast and not as razor sharp as they will look once cleaned up.

I don't use anything like as grand a camera as the 1D, but I shoot a bit of motorsport with my lowly 30D, using a 100-400L and 1.4x converter. I need to keep the AF point nailed all the time as the composition develops in front of me, if I don't, the result is a blurred image. I am always rusty at this skill early in any season, but practise makes perfect, it's less about where the AF point ended up as keeping it there all the time AI Servo is working - any wavering about will increase the cameras AF prediction workload to the extent that it cannot cope.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tdodd
Goldmember
Avatar
3,733 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Essex, UK
     
Feb 21, 2010 04:40 |  #3

From my own experience of shooting BIF with a 7D and 100-400, and prior to that a 1D3 and 50D, I find pixel peeping the higher pixel density cameras to reveal far more flaws in my own skills than those cameras with low pixel densities. I don't think the issue is AF performance. It is the difficulty of panning/tacking perfectly and freezing camera shake and subject blur sufficiently.

Occasionally I shoot a blindingly sharp BIF shot, but more often than not there is a little imperfection (sometimes more than a little) when shooting BIF. It is really a question of improving my own skills and making sure I get the shutter speed high enough. Shutter speeds of 1/(focal length x crop factor) will probably not suffice when pixel peeping. For a 1D4 you should probably aim for a shutter speed of 1/(focal length x crop factor x 3).

Of course, IS may help you bring that speed back down, especially when shooting static subjects and purposely wanting to steady the lens, but when you are trying to track a free flying bird the IS may get caught out and do more harm that good. I have recently started using IS less and less for my BIF photography. The results do not appear to be any worse as a result. Unfortunately, for shooting with a 7D I need (in theory) a shutter speed of around 1/2500 or more to freeze shake/blur at the pixel level, and that's not easy with an f/5.6 lens and winter lighting.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
10,206 posts
Likes: 1413
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Feb 21, 2010 05:40 |  #4

Even with the top of the range gear and the right settings the camera can only do its best and will not nail hard subjects such as BIF everytime even if the focus point is right on the bird .
the bird movment ,your movement and the cameras time in doing the calculations or predicting the right spot as to were the bird will be will not always match up to give the ultra sharp image we are looking for.
Often it will indeed be very close.
your first shot is OOF the seconed looks sharp to me but could do with some more sharpning.
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenTT
Senior Member
Avatar
718 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Buckinghamshire, UK
     
Feb 21, 2010 06:12 |  #5

I mainly shoot at air displays, but Just as thought, did you have "IS" turned on? I ask because at these shutter speeds I feel it may be a hinderance as I'm never quite sure how long after I start to track something, whether the "IS" has settled down into the direction of my movement.

Also I think under these conditions I would have used "Tv" priority mode.

But as others have said, not all shots come out pin sharp evertime and also technique can have a big influence. I'm always bit rusty after a winter break and find my technique gets progressively better as the season goes on.


Ken
Canon... 1Ds mk3 & 1D mk4 | EF300L f2.8 IS | EF 24-105L f4 IS | EF 70-200L f2.8 IS | EF 85L MkII | EF100L f2.8 Macro IS |EF 17-40L f4 IS | 3 x 580EX.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Feb 21, 2010 06:19 |  #6

M, I learned very early on with my 500L while shooting on an overcast day just how important contrast is to focus. In your first shot you placed the focus point in a very neutral place on the bird. In your second shot you placed it on the bird's belly, where shadow and light meet. Autofocus needs an edge to recognize and identify the proper focal distance and the sooner it has that, the sooner it can react. I'm not saying this is the only possibility for the misfocus but it can certainly be a contributor.

The 500 is an awesome lens for bird work, about 95% of my daytime subjects are birds. I'm shooting with the 1D MK II so I'm sure the MK IV blows away the AF on my camera so I know you'll be nailing the majority of yours in no time at all. Obviously practice is key here and I try to do some each time out even when I'm only ground level shooting.

This is a great conversation to start.

Good shooting.


Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tdodd
Goldmember
Avatar
3,733 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Essex, UK
     
Feb 21, 2010 06:27 |  #7

KenTT wrote in post #9650771 (external link)
I'm always bit rusty after a winter break and find my technique gets progressively better as the season goes on.

I actually find that each session I shoot I always start out a bit rusty and then improve after 20 minutes or so, if I'm able to get regular targets to "practice" on during that period. I might get the odd lucky shot, but my consistency improves after several practice runs.

Another thing to consider is that when viewing images at 100% the rule book for DOF goes out the window. The extra magnification means that what might have looked sharp as a 12x8 will not look sharp throughout the range when viewed as a 36x24 virtual image from the same distance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EdBray
Senior Member
646 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Plymouth, UK (the original one!)
     
Feb 21, 2010 06:35 |  #8

Have you worked you way through this? And have you got the latest firmware installed?

1DMk4 AF/ISO Settings guide! (external link)


Canon EOS 5DMkII, Canon EOS 10D, Canon EF17-40L, Canon EF24L TS-E MkII, Canon 24-105L IS, Canon 70-200L f4 IS, Canon EF 1.4x Extender MkII. Hasselblad 503CX, Hasselblad 500CM, Carl Zeiss 40mm, 50mm, 80mm, 150mm, 250mm For my epitaph: Do not let my wife sell any of my kit for what I've told her I paid for it! My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaDProFF
Goldmember
Avatar
4,369 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: East Sussex, UK
     
Feb 21, 2010 06:53 |  #9

How are you holding the body and camera, I found that (the stubborn way) that you really do need at least a monopod, to get a better keeper rate, I found even sitting down and hand holding my 500, 1D, or what ever body, compared to using a monopod was no where near as good keeper rate, though I know it is hard shooting upwards not easy to use anything.

I agree with the others practice makes perfect, those birds are fast in any given 360 degree movement, I would be pleased to nail just a few each time I was out.


Photographic Images on Brett Butler (external link) px500 (external link) & Flickr (external link) Some Canon Bodies , few blackish lenses, A dam heavy black one, couple dirty white ones, a 3 legged walking stick, a mono walking stick, and a bag full of rubbish :oops:
And Still Learning all walks of life, & most of all Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keith ­ R
Goldmember
2,856 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Blyth, Northumberland, NE England
     
Feb 21, 2010 06:53 |  #10

Are these screenshots telling us that you're in "All AF Points" mode?

It'd help to know your AF Custom Function settings too..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chardinej
Member
160 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Feb 21, 2010 07:24 |  #11

I would suggest taking a look at www.birdphotographers.​net (external link).


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hpulley
Goldmember
4,390 posts
Joined Oct 2009
     
Feb 21, 2010 08:30 |  #12

Perhaps a dumb question but why low speed continuous drive? I always use full high speed for birds in flight.

Next, if using IS are you holding down the button for a little while first to let it settle down? At first, IS causes shake instead of smoothing things out.

With the AF being one point only, have you turned on expansion points at all? Are you tracking well? If you miss the point on the bird in the previous frame or two then the next frame will be soft until it locks on the bird again. What AF speed have you set for it to try and reacquire focus?

Are the birds at 15m? If not then the micro adjustment may be wrong. +10 is quite a bit, for such expensive hardware body and lens I'd be tempted to send both to Canon to get them working right. You shouldn't need so much adjustment IMO and if you need that much and the subject distance is different than the MFA distance then it may be off.


flickr (external link) 1DIIN 40D 1NRS 650 1.4xII EF12II Pel8 50f1.8I 28-80II 17-40L 24-70L 100-400L 177A 199A OC-E3 RS-80N3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeassk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,329 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley
     
Feb 21, 2010 11:45 |  #13

There was a thread on Fred miranda where MANY 1D4 users were having issues with their 500L's. Specifically after the 1.06 FW update.


Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
County ­ Man
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
227 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Scotland
     
Feb 21, 2010 13:45 as a reply to  @ mikeassk's post |  #14

Thanks for all the helpfull replies, some food for thought there. I shall try to summerise from the responses given.
The second image looks sharp as it is downsized but the original lacks any feather detail and is not of a level to be print worthy. Giving that image extra sharpening and noise reduction gave it that plastic look.
I tried single centre focus point and expanded focus points with about the same success or failure in this case, I had autofocus drive at one up from slow with AF priority/Tracking Priority and Main Focus Priority if i remember correctly.
I used low speed capture which i had set to 6fps as the birds glide a lot and i felt this was enough for this bird (baby the camera)
I take on board the points about the IS and I wonder if this is the root of my problem. I used a combination of shooting methods I.E resting on a cushion and handheld and I use the AF-On button to focus but i tended to pop my thumb on and off as birds came into the view finder.
It sounds plausible to me that the slight delay in IS firing up could cause this.
Given the high shutter speeds I should in theory have been able to switch IS off, I think I will try this tomorrow weather permitting.
I feel positive that I have something to try. I will let you know how I get on
M




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,307 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
1D1V and 500F4 IS
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is NekoZ8
1192 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.