Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 21 Feb 2010 (Sunday) 11:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Odd photo apparitions, a lens problem?

 
lundgrenj
Senior Member
363 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Utah
     
Feb 21, 2010 11:10 |  #1

See the little 'eye' looking apparitions in this photo?

Taken 50mm 1.8, no flash on 7D

What is it called, and how is it prevented?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 7D, 6D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
Goldmember
Avatar
3,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
     
Feb 21, 2010 12:31 |  #2

There seems to be a pattern. Did you shoot under/near a chandelier?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lundgrenj
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
363 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Utah
     
Feb 21, 2010 12:51 |  #3

Very likely... is this just lens flare from such a thing?


Canon 7D, 6D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Feb 21, 2010 13:47 |  #4

Did you have a filter on the lens?


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lundgrenj
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
363 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Utah
     
Feb 21, 2010 13:47 |  #5

Just a UV in this case.


Canon 7D, 6D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Feb 21, 2010 13:49 |  #6

That was the cause of your problem. Take the filter off unless you are going for special effects.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lundgrenj
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
363 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Utah
     
Feb 21, 2010 13:51 |  #7

Woolburr wrote in post #9652543 (external link)
That was the cause of your problem. Take the filter off unless you are going for special effects.

I thought it was a good idea to always have a UV filter on a lens, I don't see this in other shots.. maybe it was a combo between the UV filter, and overhead lighting? Its not like it was a special effects lens, maybe Im missing something.


Canon 7D, 6D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
Goldmember
Avatar
3,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
     
Feb 21, 2010 13:52 |  #8

I agree. It's most likely a light (chandelier/candelabra​) in the room and your filter.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Feb 21, 2010 13:58 |  #9

It is a combination of your filter and the overhead lighting. You don't need a UV filter....they do nothing for digital photography....other than cause lens flares and the like which mess up your photos. If you want protection for your lens, get a lens hood....blocks stray light and protects the front element from bumps and bangs.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmitrim
Senior Member
Avatar
594 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 50
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Toronto,ON
     
Feb 21, 2010 16:15 |  #10

Been shooting for many year and never seen this one. Try without your filter. I personally think filters are bad. ALL the filters degrade the quality no matter how much they cost.


Facebook (external link)
www.dmitrimarkine.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
Goldmember
Avatar
3,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
     
Feb 21, 2010 17:40 |  #11

LOL How many photographers does it take to diagnose a flare issue... :D :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moschero
Member
232 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, Ca.
     
Feb 24, 2010 12:12 |  #12

amonline wrote in post #9653695 (external link)
LOL How many photographers does it take to diagnose a flare issue... :D :D

Unless its something stuck to the rear element. I've seen smears and dust on the rear element cause a similar effect. It probably is from the filter but it's worth taking a look for a fingerprint or something on the backside if it's not.


EOS 20D, EOS 5-D MK2, 50 MM 1.4, 24-70 MM 2.8 L, 17-40 M.M. F4 L, 70-200 F4L, 300 F4 L IS, 580 EX, 430 EX, Hensel Integra Pro Plus 500 W.S. X 3, ST-E2 Transmitter, BG-E2 Grip, Epson R1800 Printer and a credit card that has a nervous twitch

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shawnc
Member
Avatar
210 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2008
     
Feb 24, 2010 17:36 |  #13

lundgrenj wrote in post #9652551 (external link)
I thought it was a good idea to always have a UV filter on a lens, I don't see this in other shots.. maybe it was a combo between the UV filter, and overhead lighting? Its not like it was a special effects lens, maybe Im missing something.

UV filter for special effects? Huh...I feel it is always a good idea to have a UV filter on, I would rather see a filter take a hit first before my 24-70 front lens takes the hit. And always use your hood if you have it. Purely a matter of protection.
If your other shots with that lens is not showing those same apparitions, then you more than likely have a little flare from something in that room.


http://shawncarden.smu​gmug.com/ (external link)
5D II / 5D / 50D / 24-70L / 70-200 2.8L IS / EF 2x II / 85 f1.8 / 50 f1.4 / 10-22 / 580EX / EXII, Misc lenses & lighting & triggers

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,482 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Odd photo apparitions, a lens problem?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1346 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.