Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 21 Feb 2010 (Sunday) 21:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

C&C portrait

 
george ­ m ­ w
Goldmember
Avatar
4,022 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
     
Feb 21, 2010 21:03 |  #1

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Posted this in another thread on the forum and got no comments....so I can't tell if that's bad or good ! :D
Comments on lighting, posing and overall effect please. Thanks.

regards, george w

"It's also obvious that people determined to solve user error with more expensive equipment will graduate to expensive user error."
Dave N.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deathcake
Senior Member
Avatar
480 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 21, 2010 23:36 |  #2

I think it's good. Lighting works, pose seems natural enough, skin doesn't look overprocessed. Not 100% sure if I like the bars in the background. WB looks warm to me, maybe just personal preference. Model seems to be leaning her head forward a bit, which gives you a good angle on the face, but a bit unflattering on the chin.

Here's a quick change of WB and a bit more contrast, I am not sure if it looks better this way. See what everyone else thinks, since I am still a noob and can't even dream of producing anything this good.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

[gear][recent work (external link)][flickr (external link)] Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst. - Henri Cartier-Bresson

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
george ­ m ­ w
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,022 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
     
Feb 21, 2010 23:52 |  #3

DC,
Thanks for the comments and for taking the time to play around with the WB.


regards, george w

"It's also obvious that people determined to solve user error with more expensive equipment will graduate to expensive user error."
Dave N.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cololeo
Member
172 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southern Colorado
     
Feb 23, 2010 03:02 |  #4

Very nice. The hair separation is what makes it look good. The WB is much less important.

P.S. I like the first, but that's just me.


FluPics@gmail.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deathcake
Senior Member
Avatar
480 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Feb 23, 2010 04:25 |  #5

cololeo wrote in post #9663743 (external link)
Very nice. The hair separation is what makes it look good. The WB is much less important.

P.S. I like the first, but that's just me.

Haha, I just looked back at it and I think I like the original more as well. Warmer colour seems to work better =D


[gear][recent work (external link)][flickr (external link)] Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst. - Henri Cartier-Bresson

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonydee
Goldmember
Avatar
2,009 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Tokyo
     
Feb 23, 2010 04:37 |  #6

#1: skin looks very processed to me, eyes a bit milky. It's quite a tall image, combined with a downward angle on the subject and the converging lines in the background, it looks a bit "cramped" to me somehow.

I prefer the edit above... more punchy, less "honey-coated" in colours.

Cheers,
Tony


5D and too much glass. Mamiya 645E.
http://www.picasaweb.c​om/anthonypon (external link) recent work

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
george ­ m ­ w
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,022 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
     
Feb 24, 2010 14:02 |  #7

Thanks for the comments guys. And yes Tony, looking back at it, I think I over did it on the skin softening, and that was part of why I wanted to post it up this way. She liked it, and so did her mother....and it seems the trend now is to do quite a lot of skin smoothing. I printed some out from this shoot, and the above amount of skin smoothing is definitely too much at print ( IMO )....but again, she liked it. I did see that the smoothing effect was greater on the print than it appears on the monitor, so I learned I have to back it off some more on a file going to print. It's all so subjective.
Thanks again for the input from all of you.


regards, george w

"It's also obvious that people determined to solve user error with more expensive equipment will graduate to expensive user error."
Dave N.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rockfordhx
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: US
     
Feb 24, 2010 15:09 |  #8

Like everything except for the pose. Personally I would have liked to have her body and head turned more towards the lens.


http://www.nathan-photo.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damian75
Goldmember
Avatar
1,623 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2006
Location: PA
     
Feb 24, 2010 23:39 |  #9

Really nice shot, like the lighting the pose and the warm tone not thrilled with the skin processing it is just lacking texture not sure if you used a blurring layer or it's just the web compression the only other thing is I don't like that the catchlight fills the entire pupil but I'm just nick picking :)


Canon EOS 40D,30D, Canon 70-200 2.8L, 24-70 2.8L, 85 1.8, Canon extension tube, Elinchrom Lighting gear, 
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,092 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
C&C portrait
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is EBiffany
1590 guests, 97 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.