Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 22 Feb 2010 (Monday) 13:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Natural Light for the Processional

 
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Feb 22, 2010 13:42 |  #1

I always use flash for the processional, typically shooting f4-5. I'm also using one-shot which gives me some confirmation that I've achieved focus.

I see so many really beautiful natural light shots coming up the aisle and would like to do it as well, but have a few questions:

How slow a shutter speed can you safely work at to assure no motion blur; 1/60?

I assume you're using AI Servo?

Is there a max aperature you'll allow yourself for these shots?

Thanks for any and all insights.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 22, 2010 18:03 |  #2

I use one shot, F2.8, ISO3200, 1/50th if necessary, and I take LOTS of photos. I've never worked out how to use servo so I just focus and shoot really quickly. I've been doing it the same for years with good success.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PMCphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
     
Feb 22, 2010 18:48 |  #3

I use servo, but only with a fast focusing lens like a 70-200 f/2.8, 85mm 1.8, or 28 1.8 if I'm shooting wide. ISO 1600/3200, shutter speed about 1/60 minimum, depending on the lens.

I don't like to use flash if I don't have to, but if the church is dark I'll use the AF assist beam from my speedlite.


Twitter (external link)
Hobart Wedding Photography (external link)
I have some camera stuff. Here it is.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Buckeye1
Goldmember
Avatar
3,831 posts
Gallery: 106 photos
Likes: 415
Joined May 2005
     
Feb 22, 2010 20:45 as a reply to  @ PMCphotography's post |  #4

The problem with using a flash is that you can miss a really good opportunity if you just happen to take a shot just right before it since your flash does not get full charge in such a short period of time. I lean toward natural light and use 2.8 or less. I recommend asking the B&G to walk slower and stay close together if possible.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Feb 23, 2010 05:43 |  #5

I understand your "flashless" reasoning for this Buckeye - many here have a similar style with good results, but how do you deal with really dark churches, or very bad pools of light that cause unflattering shadows?

Buckeye1 wrote in post #9661948 (external link)
The problem with using a flash is that you can miss a really good opportunity if you just happen to take a shot just right before it since your flash does not get full charge in such a short period of time. I lean toward natural light and use 2.8 or less. I recommend asking the B&G to walk slower and stay close together if possible.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Feb 23, 2010 14:42 |  #6

sapearl wrote in post #9664157 (external link)
I understand your "flashless" reasoning for this Buckeye - many here have a similar style with good results, but how do you deal with really dark churches, or very bad pools of light that cause unflattering shadows?

Thanks, everyone, for your insights.

And Stu brings up another point. For me, more than half my weddings take place not in a church but at a banquet hall and it's nearlly always darker in that space even than a dark church.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Feb 24, 2010 10:42 |  #7

I try to get 1/100, but I'll drop as low as 1/40 if I'm desperate. I prefer available light for processions, but use flash when needed.

With the D700 and 1-series bodies I use servo, and one shot for my 40d. I would probably also use servo if I had a 7d


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
harroz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,749 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: New Zealand
     
Feb 24, 2010 11:22 |  #8

I use whats needed. I've never had the settings to be the same as every wedding situation is different. I set the shutter speed to the longest length by using the iso. If I'm using the 10-22 I'll be a f4.5/60, 17-55- f2.8-3.5/80 or 100 if I can. 70-200 f2.8/350. I'd rather get a sharp shot than have no noise/grain. I also use one shot, servo would probably work just as well for me but I'm confident with one shot in this situation so see no reason to change.



blog (external link) weddings (external link) commercial (external link) mm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,533 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Natural Light for the Processional
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1038 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.