This is more like it!
im not going to get into this argument, but they look posed, which i know they are, but you might try to find a way to not make them look as forced.
I thought about that. I'm not sure there is a way to do that, not too many people I know make these faces voluntarily (he does, and these are voluntary, so thats kinda funny). But in a lot of the funny face work I do, they can seem a little too contrived for some.
You can take something as commonly known as classical music (Mozart, for instance) and there is a large community that understands, respects, and enjoys the music, but there is also a large group of people who think it is ancient and that "pop" music of today is superior.
At first glance, I myself see a correlation between classical music and serious portraiture and pop music and funny faces. But thinking about it, what makes a difference between the two? Classical music often requires more skill and understanding of musical equipment, I would think. But doing funny faces requires the same lighting know how as any other facial expression. Therein is my question, what makes a stern faced portrait of lets say a native american different compared to one of these? Are you more willing and able to connect with that sort of imagery?
Just my thought, thanks for yours.
