Sorry, my bad! I didn't read the "grad" part of what you wrote. Thought you just used an nd filter, which was a little confusing!
Hahaha! I was beginning to wonder if that was the case! No worries...
.
Feb 26, 2010 14:15 | #16 rssfhs wrote in post #9688567 Sorry, my bad! I didn't read the "grad" part of what you wrote. Thought you just used an nd filter, which was a little confusing! Hahaha! I was beginning to wonder if that was the case! No worries...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rssfhs Goldmember 2,707 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Oregon More info | Feb 26, 2010 15:10 | #17 beachbum2277 wrote in post #9688594 Hahaha! I was beginning to wonder if that was the case! No worries... . You've got some awesome work in your portfolio by the way! I especially love "The Wave"!! Craig
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 26, 2010 16:11 | #18 rssfhs wrote in post #9688940 You've got some awesome work in your portfolio by the way! I especially love "The Wave"!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 28, 2010 10:39 | #19 What about the lens flare? Does it bother anyone?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 28, 2010 13:30 | #20 Nicely exposed; I love those light rays! Sony A7r, Sony 16-35 f4, Canon 1d3, Canon 70-200 f4L, Sigma 150-600 contemporary, G1X, Lee filter holder and gnd's, Singh-Ray reverse gnd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ELDUDER Member 210 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Norman OK More info | Feb 28, 2010 14:05 | #21 very nice! I love sunset pics and that definitely does the trick -Evan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 28, 2010 18:19 | #22 You don't mind the lens flare though?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 01, 2010 15:05 | #23 |
ELDUDER Member 210 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Norman OK More info | Mar 01, 2010 15:09 | #24 I'm sure some people will knock it but it doesnt really bother me, gives the photo a very natural feel I think. I have tons of sunset shots, some with, and some without flare that I like, it just kinda depends on the situation and the photo to me, on this one I'm ok with it. -Evan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rssfhs Goldmember 2,707 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Oregon More info | Mar 01, 2010 15:38 | #25 Doesn't bother me at all at that size. Maybe if it were enlarged it would. Anyway, looks like you could pretty easily clone it out if you wanted to. Craig
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 01, 2010 15:40 | #26 rssfhs wrote in post #9708323 Doesn't bother me at all at that size. Maybe if it were enlarged it would. Anyway, looks like you could pretty easily clone it out if you wanted to. The final print size will most likely be 12" x 36". I'm going to try and clone them out but was dreading doing so.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1599 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||