Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 26 Feb 2010 (Friday) 18:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

RAW mRAW sRAW 7D, what do you use?

 
anthony11
Goldmember
Avatar
2,148 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Feb 27, 2010 01:45 |  #16
bannedPermanently

Kineyas wrote in post #9691612 (external link)
I made a mistake of using mRAW once... I rely on Lightroom 99% for my personal work and it gives me an error when I try to load mRAW. I've been using RAW files since then... and all my 16gb CF cards.

That's odd -- what version of LR and of ACR are you using?


5D2, 24-105L, 85mm f/1.8, MP960, HG21, crumbling G6+R72, Brownian toddler

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DarkKnight369
Member
Avatar
220 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
     
Feb 27, 2010 02:11 |  #17

I go or the full RAW. You can make a file smaller without quality loss, but making it larger is another story. I bought a Delkin Firewire 800 card reader, so its faster than USB 2. That fastest method for me thus far is to view the RAW files in bridge, then open then in Adobe Camera RAW. I use to use preview on the mac before opening the RAW, but its too slow with the 20-25MB RAW files.


Gripped 7D || Sigma 17-50 f2.8 EX DC OS || EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 || EF 85mm f1.8 || Nifty Fifty

Website (external link)
|| Photography Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyman
Sleepless in Hampshire
Avatar
14,422 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 88
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Hampshire UK
     
Feb 27, 2010 04:19 |  #18

I tried MRAW in the early days when I had my 7D just to see what it was like, I had a sparrowhawk land in my garden, I had no time to change but wonder what it would have looked like at full RAW size, you are always left wondering what might have been. The same question would arise if shooting JPEG for convenience. So unless you get caught out on a shoot and need to save card space I would go for Max possible options every time.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.​uk (external link)
Ken
Canon 7D, 350D, 15-85, 18-55, 75-300, Cosina 100 Macro, Sigma 120-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Feb 27, 2010 04:28 as a reply to  @ artyman's post |  #19

I'd naturally use the highest quality possible. But anything that fails to reach my standard gets sent to the bin. I don't post-process anything that I am not 100% sure of.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Feb 27, 2010 06:02 |  #20

Kineyas wrote in post #9691612 (external link)
I made a mistake of using mRAW once... I rely on Lightroom 99% for my personal work and it gives me an error when I try to load mRAW. I've been using RAW files since then... and all my 16gb CF cards.

you can fix that by updating your program to LR 2.6. i had the same issue. i can now import mraw and sraw,,,,,,,but im shooting full raw files most of the time.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,118 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Austin,TX
     
Feb 27, 2010 07:07 |  #21

I have been using zoombrowser for years. I would upload al my shots, and review them and rate them (with the stars), so I could then delete the images I didn't want to keep. NOW, the previewer won't even allow me to preview the raw images...I don't know if it's shear size or what. But it's a pain.


-Andy-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,118 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Austin,TX
     
Feb 27, 2010 07:07 |  #22

I probably should try bridge as recommended too....


-Andy-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Feb 27, 2010 10:43 |  #23

Andy,

DPP offers a basic rating system which will allow you to do what you previously did in Zoombrowser.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,118 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Austin,TX
     
Feb 27, 2010 10:56 |  #24

I haven't used DPP. I will give it a shot. Thanks for the recommendation.


-Andy-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,118 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Austin,TX
     
Feb 27, 2010 10:58 |  #25

There's no way to view the image and rate it like in ZB?


-Andy-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pinoyplaya
Senior Member
948 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Apr 17, 2010 22:32 |  #26

I just used mRAW for over 1000+ images today because the first 500+ shots I took were in FullRAW. I only have 2x16GB cards and I feared that I would use up both cards and wont be able to take any more photos.

So I switched to mRAW and I am kinda regretting it because I didn't really save a lot of space at all. I just finished importing all my photos into lighroom and all of the images that were captured in mRAW are much larger or equally as large (as far as file size goes) as the FullRAW images.

So, I will not be shooting in mRAW for now, although I believe the number of burst I was able to capture jumped by about 4-6 more frames, from 18-24 without buffering. I guess that was a plus. I have yet to fully investigate the images I captured today. I probably wont get to them till next week or so :( Lots of school work. Spent the entire day shooting a track meet.


flickr (external link)Canon EOS 1D Mark III & WTB Canon 6D
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 ART | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 ART
Canon 70-200mm f/4L | Canon 580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Apr 18, 2010 01:59 |  #27

I have read somewhere that shooting in sRAW in higher ISO's will reduce the noise in the pictures.


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
That_Fox
"In the Witless Protection Program"
Avatar
1,386 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Southern California
     
Apr 18, 2010 02:04 |  #28

Combatmedic870 wrote in post #10016150 (external link)
I have read somewhere that shooting in sRAW in higher ISO's will reduce the noise in the pictures.

Not any more than downscaling the image would.


Apparently I've been dubbed Foxy.
Alamy (external link), website (external link) and gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,112 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
RAW mRAW sRAW 7D, what do you use?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
778 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.