tim wrote:
Go read the thread again. ppi is irrelevant for most situations.
I have read the thread, and many others. There seems to be a difference of opinion (examples below) thus my confusion
tommypc wrote:
Gentlemen. I create posters all the time from my digital and analog pictures. Here are some helpful tips. The majority of pictures that are to be printed are usually requested to be at 300 dpi. (Dots per Inch) However if you do a little homework you will find that most printers can't print above 200dpi, some even 150dpi. This includes some of the big poster printers. If you attempt to add information to a picture by resampling (upsampling) you are always going to see a decline in quality, you are adding false info to the picture. I have found there is no comparison between digital and analog pictures when it comes to printing, especially large format printing, analog wins every time. It is so much easier to scan an analog photograph to a high resolution thanit is to enlarge a digital photo. Pixels per Inch go out the window when you are talking printing. Dots per Inch are everything. Don't forget, most of the time if you are printing on a picture anything above 200dpi is usually a waste of storage space,the extra info of let's say a 1200 dpi picture is simply disguarded by the printer. Not to mention the extra time you will spend waiting for your printer to process the oversized file. The new cameras that put out 72dpi as a standard really erks me as they assunmed that most pictures will just be used on the internet or viewed on a computer screen or tv. Instead it would be nice if they would assume that you are going to want to make posters out of you photos and by default, the cameras should be capable of high resolution photos that can later be lowered if needed, which is the best way to do any picture. Taking away info to achieve a lower pixel count for web display is easy. To have to add info to a picture to falsely raise the pixel count is a bad idea. Have fun.
stov wrote:Ok, first post by me, and hopefully I will not get things messed up and be misleading. I agree with the whole computer side is all pixels based, you change your DPI setting in PS and you will see your pixel size shoot up and the document size remain the same. I have a 350D myself, and I did get a bit caught up in the whole 75DPI thats lousy, but look at the ducument size, its about 48 cm (I think) in its longest dimension,
so here is what I do if I want to change the DPI for printing, select and copy the one of the pixel dimensions, alter the DPI, then paste back the pixel dimension, you will see that the document size shrinks, all depending on how large you make the DPI. Now for my turn to get my head on the chopping block, if you alter the DPI and leave the pixel information the same, surely PS is creating pixels now, this will make your image loose quality due to its manufacturing information that was previously not there, keep the pixel sizes the same if you alter the DPI would be my advice. Its the old rule of never if you can increase the size of a graphic image, as you will lose quality if you are using pixels (this does not apply for vectors, but as this is not a graphic forum I will stick with what the digitial photographs are using).
As for Danavery, the large setting on the 350D spits out a 75DPI image.. if you switch to RAW, this comes out as a 240 DPI image, with no need for rescaling your DPI through PS, another thing you can do in PS is set up some actions, so you record the action happening once, then you can apply the same action to other images with just a click of the mouse (might want to check out some Photoshop forum/tips (how to) site for the how to do that side if you need it more indepth).
Hope thats helped.. rather than clouded up issues and made me open for a good flaming

EOS_JD wrote:
180ppi means nothing. How many pixels do you have?
Pixel Dimension X: 2629 Y: 2087 is this what you mean by how many pixels or do you mean the camera itself (sorry if this sounds crazy but this is all foreign to me) If you do mean camera it is a 6mp.
As for the cropping part of my question. Can I just crop to my liking and print say a 5x7, or does the image need to be a certain size (i.e. 800x600)
Also Tim, did you mean dpi? or is it true ppi and dpi area the same?
Thanks in advance