I apologize if this has already been posted. I see Adorama now has the Sigma 50-500 OS listed. The price is 1599.00.
http://www.adorama.com …l?searchinfo=sigma+50-500![]()
mayt444 Senior Member 633 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: Central Oregon-High Desert More info | Mar 04, 2010 14:32 | #1 I apologize if this has already been posted. I see Adorama now has the Sigma 50-500 OS listed. The price is 1599.00. Clay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,729 posts Likes: 4064 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Mar 04, 2010 14:37 | #2 I'm really interested to see how this lens works out. It is much better than the 150-500? I'm looking for just a bit more reach. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 04, 2010 14:49 | #3 Wow, that's a pretty steep price, much more than what I expected. I guess I don't feel bad holding on to my Bigmos. SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,729 posts Likes: 4064 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Mar 04, 2010 15:04 | #4 gabebalazs wrote in post #9729202 Wow, that's a pretty steep price, much more than what I expected. I guess I don't feel bad holding on to my Bigmos. Its new. It will drop once more units are shipped. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
evanger371 Senior Member 309 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Central New Jersey More info | Mar 04, 2010 15:06 | #5 What do you all make of this comment at the bottom of the description?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vitacura Goldmember 1,514 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: Tampa Bay, Fl More info | Mar 04, 2010 15:37 | #6 Wow.. 700 more than I spent last month for my 150-500 OS. Makes me feel good about my purchase!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
golf88 Senior Member 321 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2009 Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada More info | Mar 04, 2010 16:13 | #8 |
mayt444 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 633 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: Central Oregon-High Desert More info | I'm not sure why this was moved to the Market watch section. I posted it in the lens section because of the ongoing discussion there about the anouncement of this lens and speculation about what the cost of this lens would be. I think an explanation is in order. Clay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Mar 04, 2010 19:35 | #10 Exciting, I can't wait for the reviews to roll in! Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crn3371 Cream of the Crop 7,198 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: SoCal, USA More info | Mar 04, 2010 20:11 | #11 That's getting into L range. I hope it delivers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info | Mar 04, 2010 21:03 | #12 mayt444 wrote in post #9730708 I'm not sure why this was moved to the Market watch section. I posted it in the lens section because of the ongoing discussion there about the anouncement of this lens and speculation about what the cost of this lens would be. I think an explanation is in order. Clay
Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mirarch4960 Senior Member 316 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Valley Forge, PA More info | Mar 05, 2010 14:47 | #13 That is a steep price IMO. Much more expensive than the price I was expecting ($1.100 to $1.250 range). If that is the case, I will be more inclined to get the Canon 100-400 than the Sigma. However, no final decision can be made before having seen some pictures and hearing about the experience of some folks out there. So, I will be waiting for some feedback regarding the Sigma. Although, I have to confess that I have my eyes on the Canon 400mm prime. I know, no IS and a slow aperture, but I have seen some outstanding shots with this lens. Steve_______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Mar 05, 2010 15:27 | #14 Seems about right if the quality is there. Remember the 150-500 is not an EX grade lens like the 50-500. Pro level lens + more range = higher price. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info | Mar 05, 2010 15:34 | #15 tkbslc wrote in post #9736212 Seems about right if the quality is there. Remember the 150-500 is not an EX grade lens like the 50-500. Pro level lens + more range = higher price. the 50-500mm OS is not an EX grade lens either...they only give EX to constant aperture lenses now...i don't know if the build will be much different from the bigmos Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1334 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||