jmalonear Senior Member  651 posts Likes: 7 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Corning, AR More info | Mar 05, 2010 00:08 | #1 A friend shared this website with me and I didn't see any post on here about it. The following website will allow you to compare 2 cameras of your choice apples for apples (any that I could think of SLR and P&S). I have found it very useful! http://snapsort.com/ Friends call me Jay!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 05, 2010 00:38 | #2 jmalonear wrote in post #9732329  A friend shared this website with me and I didn't see any post on here about it. The following website will allow you to compare 2 cameras of your choice apples for apples (any that I could think of SLR and P&S). I have found it very useful! http://snapsort.com/ Awesome link. I was mulling over trading in my 20d for a refurb 50d or buying a new T1i(same $ out of pocket) . This helped me make my decision.Im going with the T1i and I get to keep my 20D Canon EOS 80D • EOS 5D | Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM • EF 70-200mm f/4L USM • EF-S 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS USM | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 OS HSM • AF 400mm f/5.6 APO
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop  14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Mar 05, 2010 06:43 | #3 The 50D gets 1 out of 5 for shooting movies. Curious how it got a 1 and not a 0. Must be the current generations expectation of entitlement Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Michael1116 Senior Member  429 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Wisconsin More info | Mar 05, 2010 07:36 | #4 I would take the comparison thing with a grain of salt.........
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien  12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Mar 05, 2010 07:50 | #5 Me too. It rates the 5D2 at 3.5 and the 7D at 5 for low-light capability. Taking a quick look at the ISO 6400 output of each will say the exact opposite. Now, if they're talking about autofocus, then yes, the 7D is better in dark situations with all focus points except the center AF point where they are quite close. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Roach182 Member 38 posts Joined Jan 2009 More info | I find the Comparometer an Imaging Resource much more useful.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jim_T Goldmember  3,312 posts Likes: 115 Joined Nov 2003 Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada More info | Mar 05, 2010 07:55 | #7 Dpreview has a similar comparison guide.... You can select a group of cameras and then compare the features side by side. I've been using this site to do camera comparisons.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tunin Goldmember  1,193 posts Likes: 5 Joined May 2007 Location: New York, NY - Medjugorje, BiH More info | Mar 05, 2010 08:00 | #8 This is quite interesting. Thx I am not young enough to know everything. O.W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
msowsun "approx 8mm"  More info | Mar 05, 2010 08:32 | #9 This website is a JOKE. They say the Canon 7D is the world's best camera. Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
irishman Goldmember  4,098 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Mar 05, 2010 09:04 | #10 And the 7D kicks a$$ on the 5D MKII. You have to take these things for what they are. 6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
irishman Goldmember 4,098 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Mar 05, 2010 09:07 | #11 bohdank wrote in post #9733251 The 50D gets 1 out of 5 for shooting movies. Curious how it got a 1 and not a 0. Must be the current generations expectation of entitlement  I don't think their scale goes to 0. 6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NinetyEight "Banned for life"  More info | Mar 05, 2010 10:12 | #12 by it's very nature '0' does not exist - Discuss... Kev
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yeah I can't say I agree with the way it always declares the "Winner", but I still like putting them side my side and comparing all the specs. Friends call me Jay!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewHicksPhotography Goldmember  2,552 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada More info | Mar 05, 2010 23:09 | #14 This says it all. Calgary Wedding Photography by Matthew Hicks: www.matthicksphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop  More info | Mar 05, 2010 23:23 | #15
Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 886 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
