Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 09 Mar 2010 (Tuesday) 12:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Weird agency requirements

 
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Mar 09, 2010 12:26 |  #1

I have just heard some very odd reasoning from a photo agency for their setting a PPI requirement.

FotoLibra set a 300 ppi requirement "because it stops pornography being uploaded".

I call that weird, anyone else know of other equally strange requirements?


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,333 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Mar 09, 2010 12:49 |  #2

Were you talking to the office cleaner?


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport (external link)/Canoe Polo (external link)/Other Stuff (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Mar 09, 2010 13:58 |  #3

A PPI requirement is not weird at all (most agencies as well as many publishers require 300PPI), but the reason they gave you is certainly strange. It's probably not the "real" reason - someone was just having fun with you!


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Mar 09, 2010 14:43 |  #4

No, its written into their blog. I was having a moan that it is unneccesary which they completely agreed with, but then referred me to the blog! They claim that pornographers cannot be bothered to jump through all the different hoops they have set up.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,818 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
     
Mar 09, 2010 14:51 |  #5

I can see where they are coming from. It is a completely arbitrary requirement and they know it but by adding such an arbitrary requirement they are blocking a large percentage of spam-bots. They could probably do even better by being even more arbitrary like 307ppi.


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickr (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,568 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Mar 09, 2010 15:02 |  #6

Very strange indeed.....I definately would've had follow up questions with an answer like that :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,233 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Weird agency requirements
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1096 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.