scottbergerphoto,
I need an icc profile for the G6 because dcraw only interpolates the RAW data. Also, Scott, BreezeBrowser uses dcraw behind its GUI to do the conversion, so it must have a profile built in (perhaps just a simple RGB). I do not want to use the canon software to do the conversion because, as the guy says in the link from my first post:
"I have owned the Canon D60 dSLR since early 2003 and have faithfully been using the Canon bundled conversion software because is it an all-in-one solution and also because I have had the idea that the the manufacturer would surely know better how the images from their cameras should be converted.
That was until I was introduced to the DCRAW, and truly, I do not have words to describe how amazingly high quality RAW conversion software it is, . . ."
As I mentioned above I gave dcraw a try. I knew the image would be dark because I was lacking a profile but after I adjusted the levels/colors I could defiantly see the difference in clarity.
That link has some pretty convincing side-by-side examples, particularly the last too. The pics on the left were converted by canon, the ones on the right by dcraw. My guess is dcraw is using a better interpolation algorithm.
Gardenstate:
This is what the David (the developer of dcraw) has to say:
(http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/
)
Well, despite the convenience and ubiquity of JPEG, there are some disadvantages. JPEG is a lossy format -- to fit a big image into a small file, a lot of information is thrown away. That's why midrange and high-end digital cameras offer an alternative: Raw, unprocessed CCD data files, for which the camera manufacturer provides special decoding software.
So here is my mission: Write an ANSI C program that decodes any raw image from any digital camera on any computer running any operating system.
That program is called dcraw.c, and it's become a standard tool within and without the Open Source world. It's small (about 5000 lines), portable (standard C libraries only), free (both "gratis" and "libre"), and when used skillfully, produces better
quality output
than the tools provided by the camera vendor.
So basically IF this is true: "when used skillfully, [dcraw] produces better
quality output
than the tools provided by the camera vendor" then I want to give it a try.
Now if i could only get my hands on some icc profiles for the G6, or figure out how BreezeBrowser does it, or learn how to create them, or . . .
Thanks for your post, guys.
-Kevin