Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
Thread started 14 Mar 2010 (Sunday) 10:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Wildlife photographer going to extemes to get the shot

 
Candor
Goldmember
Avatar
4,976 posts
Gallery: 159 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 12137
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Mar 14, 2010 10:40 |  #1

I don't know if this has been posted anywhere but I haven't seen it. An interesting interview of a wildlife photographer in South Africa who spent 270 hours submerged in a watering hole to get a different perspective for his shots. This is dedication.

http://www.msnbc.msn.c​om …4540/vp/3585970​9#35859709 (external link)


Mike
MikesWildLife (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Mar 14, 2010 11:03 |  #2

The shots are fantastic but the way he got them is pretty stupid. There are so many other way to get the shots he did without subjecting his body to malaria and all kinds of parasites. Clearly the dude needs to read his manual. :)


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nox ­ Noctis
Member
174 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2009
Location: West Virginia
     
Mar 14, 2010 11:14 |  #3

now that is dedication




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vladimer
Senior Member
Avatar
634 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 14, 2010 12:11 |  #4

Pretty nice shots. Not sure if I'd want to get malaria twice and other parasites though.. probably change my mind and approach it another way after the first time lol




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Mar 14, 2010 12:26 |  #5

Like tethered shooting and remote control ball head. There are so many other ways, but of course, then he wouldn't have gotten on the news. Sitting in swamp water and coming back with outstanding pics gets you on the news. Using remote methods and coming back gets you outstanding pictures. Course he may be exaggerating the hours and the diseases just to make it more newsworthy. Yea.. I'm a cynic.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Candor
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,976 posts
Gallery: 159 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 12137
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Mar 14, 2010 17:31 |  #6

270 hours does seem a bit unbelievable but if he did spend that amount of time in the water my hat is off to him.


Mike
MikesWildLife (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Combatmedic870
Goldmember
Avatar
1,739 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Salem ,OR
     
Mar 14, 2010 20:07 |  #7

270 in 3 months I believe...3 hours a day. It says it in the article.


Nikon D700: 16-35 F4, 50 1.4G, 85 1.8,105 VR Micro, 135F2 DC, 80-200 2.8 AFS
Olympus XZ-1
,Ryan
Sometimes, I think Photography is worse than Crack.:oops:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vladimer
Senior Member
Avatar
634 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 14, 2010 22:12 |  #8

Ah yes, when i saw the video she made it sound like it was 270 straight which seemed very far fetched but makes sense after reading the article. Figured he would looked like quite a prune spending all that time in the water




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8390
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Mar 15, 2010 02:53 |  #9

He did exactly what it takes to get the images he got. Anyone who's spent thousands of hours photographing wildlife in the wilderness knows that remote setups don't allow you to have the control you need to get images exactly the way you want them.

I am very impressed by not only his work, but by the methods he employed to produce it.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sparker1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
29,368 posts
Likes: 295
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
     
Mar 15, 2010 07:26 |  #10

This may sound extreme, but probably is less so that what many other photographers go through to get their unique shots. I recall the Nat Geo guy who spent months in the mountains of Afghanistan to shoot a snow leopard. He never saw it until the last day he was to be there, but seized the opportunity and got fantastic footage. He was out there 24/7, not in water but up to his butt in snow. The images we see are taken for granted, but we never know the lengths to which the photographer went in order to get those shots.


Stan (See my gallery at http://www.pbase.com/s​parker1 (external link))

7D, 50D, 300D, EF-S 10-22 mm, EF-S 18-55 mm kit lens, EF 24-105 L IS, EF 50 mm 1.8, Sigma 150-500mm (Bigmos)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,683 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Wildlife photographer going to extemes to get the shot
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2866 guests, 180 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.