Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 14 Mar 2010 (Sunday) 20:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Stupid Question: 580EX II off shoe vs Alien Bees B800

 
Marloon
Goldmember
4,323 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC.
     
Mar 15, 2010 00:11 |  #16

gonzogolf wrote in post #9797831 (external link)
Keep in mind that its more than just a power difference. A hotshoe flash is a focused lens. The canon is capable of zooming in and out, but has a limit of spread on the wide end. The Alien bee is a bare bulb studio flash, meaning the light is pretty much unrestrained without a modifier. This allows you to work with significantly larger softboxes, or the plm system. With a hotshoe flash any softbox bigger than about 28 inches and you begin to lose efficiency.

all benefits of a studio flash. Well said.


I'm MARLON

Former Canon Platinum CPS member

5DII • 24L • 35L • 50L • 85L • 135L • 200LIS

Wordpress Blog (external link)Youtube Channel (external link)Twitter (external link)Gear List (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisMc73
Goldmember
Avatar
3,212 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
     
Mar 15, 2010 10:42 |  #17

mrrod2001 wrote in post #9797579 (external link)
Get both.
I got a 550ex from Ebay for $199 and calumet genesis 400 kit for about $275 on sale and cactus v4 triggers.

Are you sure it was the Genesis 400 kit for $275 and not the Genesis 200 kit?
I checked out the site and the 200 kit is right now $369 regular and the 400 is $619 regular...

$275 seems closer to a sale price for the Genesis 200 kit. Unless it was a hell of a sale?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
c2thew
Goldmember
Avatar
3,929 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Not enough minerals.
     
Mar 15, 2010 13:40 |  #18

if you don't already have a ex speedlight for your camera, get the speedlight. done deal.


Flickr (external link) |Gear|The-Digital-Picture (external link)|The $6 mic | MAGIC LANTERN (external link) | Welding Filter
Go Support Magic Lantern 2.3!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lazer-jock
Don't mess
Avatar
1,557 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
     
Mar 15, 2010 14:48 |  #19

ChrisMc73 wrote in post #9800067 (external link)
Are you sure it was the Genesis 400 kit for $275 and not the Genesis 200 kit?
I checked out the site and the 200 kit is right now $369 regular and the 400 is $619 regular...

$275 seems closer to a sale price for the Genesis 200 kit. Unless it was a hell of a sale?

It could have been the 400 Ws 1-light kit when it was on sale a while back.

http://www.calumetphot​o.com/item/CF0514K/ (external link)


I'm off lining my cage with newspaper.
My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisMc73
Goldmember
Avatar
3,212 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
     
Mar 15, 2010 15:12 |  #20

lazer-jock wrote in post #9801644 (external link)
It could have been the 400 Ws 1-light kit when it was on sale a while back.

http://www.calumetphot​o.com/item/CF0514K/ (external link)

Ah yes, it could have been a one light set up rather than a two light setup. Not sure why I was thinking two lights?
One light makes a lot more sense. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrrod2001
Member
102 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Bay Area, Ca
     
Mar 15, 2010 19:50 as a reply to  @ ChrisMc73's post |  #21

It was a 2 lite set up.....but i went in halves with a friend for around $550 and we each got a 1 lite setup. The last sale we did the same thing with the genesis 200 2 lite kit, it was around $299 so we each got 1 lite for around $160 after tax. They seem to be good lights.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisMc73
Goldmember
Avatar
3,212 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
     
Mar 15, 2010 21:26 |  #22

mrrod2001 wrote in post #9803460 (external link)
It was a 2 lite set up.....but i went in halves with a friend for around $550 and we each got a 1 lite setup. The last sale we did the same thing with the genesis 200 2 lite kit, it was around $299 so we each got 1 lite for around $160 after tax. They seem to be good lights.

Seem to be? How long have you had them? Do you have any sample shots you can share that were taken using them? I'm curious how these compare to some of the others in the same price range?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
C_Riv
Member
Avatar
65 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Mar 16, 2010 02:30 |  #23

The question you asked was very broad.
You should think about how you shoot, and what you plan to shoot.

The main differences that you should consider are:

Weight/space
Functions
Power


I would check out zach arias if you havent already, specifically this post (external link)

With the AB, you are paying for the power. The 580exII has a lot more function, is small and compact, and can work as a master for a wireless setup. With the AB you can do as Zach did, and get a huge Octo and overpower the sun at high noon.

Things to consider.


http://www.darrinriver​.com (external link) - My Website - http://www.indiadarrin​.blogspot.com (external link) - My photo blog while in India! - Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Siriusmuzik
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
318 posts
Joined Nov 2007
     
Mar 17, 2010 16:53 |  #24
bannedPermanent ban

Hi all, thanks for your replies.

C-Riv,
thanks for the link.

I plan on doing indoor portraits, and outdoors. I think right now, I will just get the 580EX II, and save money for the B800 and vagabond II.

The 580EX is still powerful while giving me the versatility of portability. I will just have to wait and save for the B800.

C_Riv wrote in post #9805618 (external link)
The question you asked was very broad.
You should think about how you shoot, and what you plan to shoot.

The main differences that you should consider are:

Weight/space
Functions
Power


I would check out zach arias if you havent already, specifically this post (external link)

With the AB, you are paying for the power. The 580exII has a lot more function, is small and compact, and can work as a master for a wireless setup. With the AB you can do as Zach did, and get a huge Octo and overpower the sun at high noon.

Things to consider.


Canon 7D| Canon 24-105mm F4L | Canon 50mm F1.8 II | Canon 85mm F1.8 | Tamron 17-50mm | Tamron 28-75mm | Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MT ­ Stringer
Goldmember
Avatar
4,652 posts
Likes: 6
Joined May 2006
Location: Channelview, Tx
     
Mar 17, 2010 17:37 |  #25

I think right now, I will just get the 580EX II, and save money for the B800 and vagabond II.

Sounds like your mind is made up. For the last few months, I have been dragging two AB 1600's around along with all of the associated gear to make them work. No Vagabond though, just extension cords for use in high school gyms and arenas.

I didn't do the math, but it seems to me that you could buy several Canon 540EZ speedllights, or Sigma EF 500 or 530 DG Super or Vivitar 285 and light stands, umbrella adapters, hot shoe adapters and Cybersyncs and wind up with a lot more adjustable light set up than just one 580EX II. Off camera, you don't need all the features of the 580, just a flash with some power that can be triggered with wireless triggers/receivers.

If you like, check out my thread about my experience this year with the AB 1600's.
Good luck.
Mike


MaxPreps Profile (external link)

My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stuart ­ Leslie
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: New York
     
Mar 17, 2010 18:35 as a reply to  @ MT Stringer's post |  #26

I think rather than the cost, best to think about what you want to acheive. I agree that the 580 is a good first step. But if you are serious about shooting portraits indoors the AB800 takes you to another level of lighting posibilities. I love my 580, but there is no comparison in my portrait work since taking the plunge and getting the 800's. My 580 still gets a lot of use, but the 800's are my clear preference for main light in the studio. Really depends on what you want to acheive.


Gear: Canon 5D III, 5D and 7D | 300 f/2.8L IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 85 f/1.8 | 17-55 f/2.8 [COLOR=navy]| 24-105 f/4L | 10-22 | Zeiss 35 f/2 | TS-E 24II | Alienbees
SmugMug Gallery (external link)
Model Mayhem (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
111t
Senior Member
Avatar
577 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Mar 17, 2010 20:05 |  #27

Player9 wrote in post #9796987 (external link)
The B800 is significantly more powerful, significantly more flexible in using lighting modifiers, and significantly less expensive.

The 580ex is significantly more portable.

What are you trying to do with your lighting?

Yup, pretty much it.


All The best!
-Paul

WHAT TO DO IF YOU DON"T HAVE A LIGHT METER AND YOU STILL WANT TO MAKE INTELLIGENT EXPOSURE DECISIONS.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FullStop ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
597 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: The OC
     
Mar 18, 2010 00:28 |  #28

Siriusmuzik wrote in post #9817111 (external link)
Hi all, thanks for your replies.

C-Riv,
thanks for the link.

I plan on doing indoor portraits, and outdoors. I think right now, I will just get the 580EX II, and save money for the B800 and vagabond II.

The 580EX is still powerful while giving me the versatility of portability. I will just have to wait and save for the B800.

I think you're making a good choice. I started off like you, with "just" a 580 EX II, and learned to shoot off-camera flash with it and a few Vivitars (you'll need to invest in some radio triggers, I recommend Cybersyncs). Add an umbrella, adapter, stand, and you're good to go for a while. For outdoor use, you'll need to use weights, and maybe later on consider a portable softbox (I've heard the Qbox is a nice one for speedlights; I have an Ezybox but that thing is kind of pricey). Later on, if you find your photography is needing more juice in the lighting department, then look into the Bees; you'll still have a great speedlight which will be useful in situations where you have to do on-camera flash. Just my $0.02.


website (external link) · facebook (external link) · tumblr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
_method
Member
207 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: New York
     
Mar 18, 2010 08:56 |  #29

You could also pick up a 580EX II for around 350 bones if you don't mind getting it used.


Flickr (external link)
MatthewBaltrusitis.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightworks ­ Imaging
Goldmember
1,525 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: West Allis, WI USA
     
Mar 18, 2010 12:44 |  #30

c2thew wrote in post #9801199 (external link)
if you don't already have a ex speedlight for your camera, get the speedlight. done deal.

+1

I couldn't imagine living with out at least one shoe mounted flash. I'd think that a) it's a ESSENTIAL part of kit.

b) more versatile, can be used either off camera, on the shoe, on a bracket... i.e. you can't mount an AB800 on the camera.


I use mine for everything, if I only have the gear bag, and not my lighting bag.


Just the humble musings of a beginner...
Eric
Lightworks Imaging (external link)
MM (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,384 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
Stupid Question: 580EX II off shoe vs Alien Bees B800
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1004 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.