I'm interested in getting a 1D MKII or 1D MKIIn
What are the common problems does these cameras usually have and what should I look for?
Should I worry about the high shutter count on these cameras?
Thanks in advance.
Jardiniboy Senior Member 508 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Waipahu, Hawaii More info | Mar 15, 2010 20:21 | #1 |
Mar 16, 2010 00:59 | #2 I dotn have much advice on what kind of problesm these cams can have... Brent Oliver
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joeseph "smells like turd" More info | Mar 16, 2010 01:27 | #3 Jardiniboy wrote in post #9803650 What are the common problems does these cameras usually have and what should I look for? one common problem is that folks don't want to part with them... some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hpulley Goldmember 4,390 posts Joined Oct 2009 More info | Mar 16, 2010 07:11 | #4 The shutter count is unreliable since you can save and load camera settings (cool feature) and the shutter count gets reloaded as well. Doesn't even have to be done on purpose, if you save a sports setup and a portraits setup and reload them it will reset the shutter count every time. But they are rated to last a long time and well built. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LyndonChen Member 191 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: Denver, CO More info | Mar 16, 2010 10:23 | #5 Fyi, the 1D2 shutter is rated to 200,000 actuations. The 1D2n is either 200,000 or 250,000, I don't remember which. http://www.shiningmomentphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hpulley Goldmember 4,390 posts Joined Oct 2009 More info | Mar 16, 2010 10:27 | #6 Might get more responses in the 1D Mark II thread: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=458150 flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LiquidSword Senior Member 383 posts Joined Aug 2008 Location: Central FL More info | Mar 16, 2010 10:37 | #7 Very little issues with mine. There is always the softer default pics due to a stronger AA filter. Easy fix as the files take well to PP sharpening. Also, dont expect the same ISO performance of today's cameras. I dont go past 800 with mine. It can be done, but be prepared for some noise program I guess. Other than that, I love mine. 8 MP file size could be an issue if you plan on very large prints. I'm about to find out first hand with some shots I took how that turns out. Anderson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hpulley Goldmember 4,390 posts Joined Oct 2009 More info | Mar 16, 2010 10:40 | #8 I use mine to 3200 and find the noise is actually very good, easy to remove with DPP but ideally you would use lower, it is really clean from 100-400, 800 isn't bad, 1600 and 3200 need NR. Takes sharpening well. I like the 8.5x11" prints from mine, even with a bit of a crop and I'm sure I could go higher if necessary but try to frame well as you can't expect to crop the middle 1/4 of the frame and blow it up like you can with a zillion megapixels. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ahendarman Senior Member 851 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2008 Location: SoCal More info | Mar 16, 2010 11:26 | #9 At around $850, a good condition used 1D mark II is a lot of camera for the price. I would get it over a Rebel or a 50D. For a couple hundred more, the mark IIN has a better LCD screen, picture style, slightly bigger buffer, ability to write RAW/JPEG to different card and couple small refinements here and there. It may worth it to you, but most of them are related to JPEG. If you shoot RAW, which you should, then the differences are very minor. The IIN average at about $1200, you might as well spend a bit more and get a 7D.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 16, 2010 11:56 | #10 |
hpulley Goldmember 4,390 posts Joined Oct 2009 More info | Mar 16, 2010 12:07 | #11 Unless you think it will need a new shutter right away the N for $50 more sounds good. A week after I got my Mark II a IIN sold for $45 less than what I paid... argh, what can you do eh? But mine had a 90 day warranty so I was still pleased. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sonnyc Cream of the Crop 5,175 posts Likes: 36 Joined Jun 2005 Location: san jose More info | Mar 16, 2010 12:09 | #12 For $50 more, yes go with the N model. Of course it's depend on how "heavily" used it is. If it's really really beat up then different story but normal scratches are fine. High shutter count is a moot point too since the ones with bad shutter usually failed at an early age; mine failed at 10k and sold at 57k without issue.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 16, 2010 14:45 | #13 |
ahendarman Senior Member 851 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2008 Location: SoCal More info | Mar 16, 2010 15:43 | #14 Adorama is usually conservative about their rating. However a G rating is on their lowest scale, so you may get a beat up camera. I suggest to give them a call and ask for the actual picture of the camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 16, 2010 23:39 | #15 ahendarman wrote in post #9809391 Adorama is usually conservative about their rating. However a G rating is on their lowest scale, so you may get a beat up camera. I suggest to give them a call and ask for the actual picture of the camera. edit: Also try to send email to Helen Oster from Adorama, she's been really helpful to a lot of people here.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1493 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||