Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 15 Mar 2010 (Monday) 21:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Alienbees B400 or B800

 
SheenL
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Mar 15, 2010 21:58 |  #1

Hey guys. I am planning on getting my 1st studio strobe. I already have a 580ex and 430ex that I plan on using for hair, fill, or backround. I know its good to have more power than not enough, but Ive read that using the B800s and low power results in not good light quality and that if the b800 are to powerful, I may be forced to shoot at small apertures, since I dont have much room to move the light back.

What are your thoughts.. thanks

Sheen




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
v35skyline
Goldmember
3,572 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Apr 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Mar 15, 2010 22:14 |  #2

SheenL wrote in post #9804409 (external link)
Hey guys. I am planning on getting my 1st studio strobe. I already have a 580ex and 430ex that I plan on using for hair, fill, or backround. I know its good to have more power than not enough, but Ive read that using the B800s and low power results in not good light quality and that if the b800 are to powerful, I may be forced to shoot at small apertures, since I dont have much room to move the light back.

What are your thoughts.. thanks

Sheen

You just contradicted yourself. :p

PCB strobes have been seen to have inconsistent color and output at 1/8 or lower.

It sounds like you will be using it indoors, and a smaller room at that?

I just went through a similar dilemma. I've been advised to get the "right" amount of power, instead of too much, when it comes to PCB strobes.


X100s | X-Pro1 | X-T1 | XF 14 | XF 18 | XF 35 | XF 56 | XF 60 | XF 10-24
Gear List & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichNY
Goldmember
Avatar
1,817 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
Mar 15, 2010 23:09 |  #3

Sheen- The issue with the b800 is when using it at its lowest settings the light picks up a magenta tint. It you just don't want to shoot at small apertures you can add a simple circular neutral density filter on your lens.


Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
munzzzzzzz
Senior Member
591 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: SE WI
     
Mar 16, 2010 08:33 |  #4

If a B800 is in your budget and you also plan on cybersyncs, you might want to think about whether or not you'd be willing to spend an extra $100 (and wait a few weeks) to get an Einstein that has double the power of the B800 but can also drop to half the lowest power setting of the B400, all without any changes in color. (this is just one of many features it totes)

The B800 is $280, plus $90 for a CSRB+, or $370. The Einstein is going to sell for $440, plus $30 for a CSXCV, or $470. This of course assumes you're getting the "+" for compatibility with the CyberCommander. The B1600's sell for $360, plus $90 for a CSRB+ or $450, so you're only paying $20 more than a B1600 setup and getting a LOT more functionality.

The specs, of course, are all just preliminary at this point as they haven't shipped yet, but it seems from the testing that PCB has done that they're going to hold up to the claims.

I'm in the market for a couple strobes myself, and I just made the decision to hold out for two Einstein's. And for the record, no, I'm not a salesman for PCB, I've just been doing a lot of reading and am getting pretty excited about the Einstein's. I really hope they're everything they're supposed to be.


6D | 40mm f/2.8 | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200mm f/4L IS | 580EXII | 2x PCB Einstein | Various Modifiers

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SheenL
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Mar 16, 2010 20:42 |  #5

munzzzzzzz wrote in post #9806650 (external link)
If a B800 is in your budget and you also plan on cybersyncs, you might want to think about whether or not you'd be willing to spend an extra $100 (and wait a few weeks) to get an Einstein that has double the power of the B800 but can also drop to half the lowest power setting of the B400, all without any changes in color. (this is just one of many features it totes)

The B800 is $280, plus $90 for a CSRB+, or $370. The Einstein is going to sell for $440, plus $30 for a CSXCV, or $470. This of course assumes you're getting the "+" for compatibility with the CyberCommander. The B1600's sell for $360, plus $90 for a CSRB+ or $450, so you're only paying $20 more than a B1600 setup and getting a LOT more functionality.

The specs, of course, are all just preliminary at this point as they haven't shipped yet, but it seems from the testing that PCB has done that they're going to hold up to the claims.

I'm in the market for a couple strobes myself, and I just made the decision to hold out for two Einstein's. And for the record, no, I'm not a salesman for PCB, I've just been doing a lot of reading and am getting pretty excited about the Einstein's. I really hope they're everything they're supposed to be.

RichNY wrote in post #9804817 (external link)
Sheen- The issue with the b800 is when using it at its lowest settings the light picks up a magenta tint. It you just don't want to shoot at small apertures you can add a simple circular neutral density filter on your lens.

v35skyline wrote in post #9804523 (external link)
You just contradicted yourself. :p

PCB strobes have been seen to have inconsistent color and output at 1/8 or lower.

It sounds like you will be using it indoors, and a smaller room at that?

I just went through a similar dilemma. I've been advised to get the "right" amount of power, instead of too much, when it comes to PCB strobes.

Thanks all, Ive decided to go with the 800. I've read that a custom white balance will nix the issue of the color cast if I experience it when in low power..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Mar 16, 2010 21:04 |  #6

SheenL wrote in post #9811240 (external link)
Thanks all, Ive decided to go with the 800. I've read that a custom white balance will nix the issue of the color cast if I experience it when in low power..

Pop to pop inconsistency is the problem. So even if you do WB, you not sure if that WB will hold for the next few shots. Personally if you need to shoot at those lower powers, AB400 is better option.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tyger
Goldmember
Avatar
1,295 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: toronto, canada
     
Mar 16, 2010 21:20 |  #7

I was in the same dilemma last year and opted to go with 2 ab400's since I was shooting only indoor in a fairly tight space and it has served me well and still does. Now, I'm starting to plan some on location shoots, so an ab800 or 1600 is in the near future. I can always use the ab400's as background or hair lights.

I think the ab800 is a safe bet if you want to eventually do outdoor shoots.

How much space do you have?


Gear List
You create your reality.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stuart ­ Leslie
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: New York
     
Mar 17, 2010 18:50 as a reply to  @ Tyger's post |  #8

I just "moved up" from my 580/430 flashes to AB's so will share my experience. I have two AB800's and one AB400. The AB800's in my small living room studio work very well. The WB has not really been an issue for me. Shooting at f/8 you will often be above the worry zone of 1/16 power. With that said, I shoot at 1/16 regularly and find it is pretty easy to adjust WB and get the shots I want. My AB400 does let me shoot at a higher power level, but when in a large octabox it starts getting "maxed out" anyway so I end up putting the 800's in instead. When I decided to go for shallower DOF- shooting at f/1.8- I got a ND filter for my lens and the 800's still are not too much power. If you are getting one, I would recommend the 800. It gives you more flexibility and allows for the occasonaly outdoor shot where you really need the extra power.


Gear: Canon 5D III, 5D and 7D | 300 f/2.8L IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 85 f/1.8 | 17-55 f/2.8 [COLOR=navy]| 24-105 f/4L | 10-22 | Zeiss 35 f/2 | TS-E 24II | Alienbees
SmugMug Gallery (external link)
Model Mayhem (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Mar 17, 2010 21:58 |  #9

Stuart Leslie wrote in post #9817793 (external link)
My AB400 does let me shoot at a higher power level, but when in a large octabox it starts getting "maxed out" anyway so I end up putting the 800's in instead.

I got both AB 400 and 800s. When using AB800 at 1/2 power in a 5' photoflex octodome with internal as well as outer diffuser I get f8 at 10 feet at ISO100. So for indoors AB400 is plenty powerful for most jobs. Cheap way to get more power indoors, bump up to ISO200 as you aren't fighting ambient like in outdoors.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stuart ­ Leslie
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: New York
     
Mar 18, 2010 09:16 |  #10

bobbyz wrote in post #9818941 (external link)
I got both AB 400 and 800s. When using AB800 at 1/2 power in a 5' photoflex octodome with internal as well as outer diffuser I get f8 at 10 feet at ISO100. So for indoors AB400 is plenty powerful for most jobs. Cheap way to get more power indoors, bump up to ISO200 as you aren't fighting ambient like in outdoors.

Agree, but I must admit one of the nice discoveries moving from canon flashes to AB's is the ability to shoot with the room lights full up. ISO 100 and f/8 at sync speed gives me a pure black with only ambient. Very easy to move about in a fully lit room with cords and stands all around.


Gear: Canon 5D III, 5D and 7D | 300 f/2.8L IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 85 f/1.8 | 17-55 f/2.8 [COLOR=navy]| 24-105 f/4L | 10-22 | Zeiss 35 f/2 | TS-E 24II | Alienbees
SmugMug Gallery (external link)
Model Mayhem (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Mar 18, 2010 10:21 |  #11

Stuart Leslie wrote in post #9821201 (external link)
Agree, but I must admit one of the nice discoveries moving from canon flashes to AB's is the ability to shoot with the room lights full up. ISO 100 and f/8 at sync speed gives me a pure black with only ambient. Very easy to move about in a fully lit room with cords and stands all around.

Same here. I also leave room lights on. Even with ISO 200 and f8, you won't see ambient making any difference. Like I said, AB400 gives f8 at 10' at full power, ISO100 with big modifier like me 5' octobox. But if I need to shoot say f2.8-f4, it gives better power and WB control than AB800.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,695 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Alienbees B400 or B800
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1876 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.