I am thinking this will make a great combo. Any other 5d'ers with this same setup? Will I be lacking anything on the wide end with f4 being my minimum f stop?
(I was either going to rock the 17-40L or the 35mm f2 with the 85mm f1.8 )
bakatari Senior Member 459 posts Joined Aug 2008 Location: Seattle More info | Mar 16, 2010 17:13 | #1 I am thinking this will make a great combo. Any other 5d'ers with this same setup? Will I be lacking anything on the wide end with f4 being my minimum f stop? 5d2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
binlerne Senior Member 870 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: San Diego, CA More info | Mar 16, 2010 19:16 | #2 f/4 is fine for wide angle as usually you stop down to get everything in focus. And with the 5D being as good as it is at high ISO, you can get faster shutter speeds. You don't even need that fast of shutter speed at that wide of an angle. I had the 5D 17-40, 85 and 135L as my set up for a while and it was pretty darn good.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LyndonChen Member 191 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: Denver, CO More info | Mar 16, 2010 19:30 | #3 Or conversely, wide angle is where you need the widest apertures in order to highlight your subject and throw the background oof. Obviously unimportant for landscapes, but for people... http://www.shiningmomentphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Mar 16, 2010 20:26 | #4 bakatari wrote in post #9810024 I am thinking this will make a great combo. No one can really give you advice without knowing the intended subjects for the lenses. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samurairx7 Goldmember 1,045 posts Joined Aug 2008 Location: Chi-City 312 More info | Mar 16, 2010 21:18 | #5 mmmmm... i own both and loved it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
spacetime Goldmember 1,276 posts Joined Oct 2009 More info | Mar 16, 2010 21:47 | #6 Great combo. I love the 17-40 for land/city scapes and usually use it stopped down. Teh 85mm is good for portraits and has great bokeh and AF speed. I prefer the 135mm f2 or even the 200mm f2.8 for portraits though the latter sometimes has a weird compression with eyes for some reason.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrettMarkhamPhoto Senior Member 371 posts Likes: 3 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Rochester, MI More info | Mar 16, 2010 22:47 | #7 I own both of these... -Brett
LOG IN TO REPLY |
K6AZ Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 16, 2010 23:04 | #9 I have both and love them on the 5D. The 85mm was good on 1.6x bodies but it is really sweet on the 5D and I can't lay out the dough for a 85L.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LyndonChen Member 191 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: Denver, CO More info | Mar 16, 2010 23:06 | #10 If you want faster wide angle lenses, there's more than just the 16-35L. 28 1.8, or as the OP mentioned, the 35 2. Both of these are at least 2 stops faster than the 17-40L. Again, if you're shooting people and not landscapes, you may wish for more than f4. But if landscapes is the purpose, then yeah go for the 17-40L. http://www.shiningmomentphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yugenm Member 68 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | Mar 16, 2010 23:31 | #11 Had that setup for a short while, didn't like it as I'd rather have a fast wide prime and a zoom for a telephoto "f/8, Tri-X, and be there."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jam.radonc Goldmember 1,187 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Dublin More info | Mar 17, 2010 09:16 | #12 The 17-40 with the 5D is a fine combination but to me it is probable best outdoor as i would regularly stop it down for the depth of field. It is somewhat lacklustre indoor unless you are going to use your flash with it. It's performance wide open is so so. Jam
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Mar 17, 2010 12:05 | #13 Unless you are shooting people and shutter speed is an issue, the 17-40 can be handheld in virtually any lighting condition where there is actually light, imo. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alpha_1976 Goldmember 3,961 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: USA More info | Mar 17, 2010 12:51 | #14 bakatari wrote in post #9810024 I am thinking this will make a great combo. Any other 5d'ers with this same setup? Will I be lacking anything on the wide end with f4 being my minimum f stop? (I was either going to rock the 17-40L or the 35mm f2 with the 85mm f1.8 ) 17-40 is great on 5D. And I don't think you need to worry about f4 as you will be using it stopped down most of the time. I know more about gear than I know about photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1698 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||