Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 16 Mar 2010 (Tuesday) 21:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

For the old school: How the heck did you organize photos in the film days?

 
dharrisphotog
Goldmember
Avatar
2,331 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Mar 16, 2010 21:16 |  #1

I was messing around with my LR and setting up my Collections and Collection Sets. Then I began thinking, before computers and amazing software like LR, how in the world did you guys organize and search for photos back in the days of film??? Just curious.


D800 | Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art | Nikkor 85mm 1.8G | Nikkor 70-200 2.8G
Gear | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DrPablo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Mar 16, 2010 22:15 |  #2

I keep my negatives in 3-ring binders in archival sleeves, and I keep prints in envelopes in boxes. There are various companies that make acid free, stable, archival materials for storing photos.

And in 2010 I also store my film stuff digitally. My best film shots I drum scan at high resolution and store them like any digital shot.


Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
Film gear: Agfa 8x10, Cambo 4x5, Noblex 150, Hasselblad 500 C/M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWright
Planes, trains and ham radio...
Avatar
18,399 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Dec 2004
     
Mar 16, 2010 23:43 as a reply to  @ DrPablo's post |  #3

Organize? Who's organized?


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
breal101
Goldmember
2,724 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2006
     
Mar 17, 2010 00:00 |  #4

Lots of file cabinets with archival sleeves for transparencies and negatives alphabetically by client and date shot. My personal stuff was in separate file cabinets arranged by subject matter. I kept very few prints.


"Try to go out empty and let your images fill you up." Jay Maisel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Mar 17, 2010 01:00 as a reply to  @ breal101's post |  #5

I stored my negatives/trannies in ring binders.. I would number each individual negative then do a contact sheet which was stored with the negatives.. Each ring binder had the genre and the date to and from.. I started using different coloured ring binders for each genre..


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Mar 17, 2010 03:36 |  #6

yogestee wrote in post #9812651 (external link)
I stored my negatives/trannies in ring binders.. I would number each individual negative then do a contact sheet which was stored with the negatives.

This is precisely what I would do, though the numbering of each frame was already done by Kodak.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
6,148 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Mar 17, 2010 06:24 |  #7

Pretty easy to organize 24 pics at a time. :lol:

I think it would be alot easier then trying to organize digital. I'm thinking I need to buy a second external drive (a larger one) and transfer all my pics over to that, while organizing at the same time. My current drives are so cluttered it's hard to move things around.


Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Mar 17, 2010 09:11 |  #8

SkipD wrote in post #9813070 (external link)
This is precisely what I would do, though the numbering of each frame was already done by Kodak.

This works fine until you have more than one roll per shoot..


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
20droger
Cream of the Crop
14,685 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 17, 2010 09:51 as a reply to  @ yogestee's post |  #9

Binders and albums. I was not a pro, so I didn't have that many shots, only about a thousand or so.

I lost over 90% of my creative stuff in a small disaster one year. That's everything, photos, poetry, personal writings, original manuscripts of published stuff. Poof! Gone forever.

Digital is much better, with multiple-venue storage.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sneakerpimp
Senior Member
Avatar
665 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2008
Location: The O.C.
     
Mar 17, 2010 10:07 |  #10

Razeus wrote in post #9811479 (external link)
I was messing around with my LR and setting up my Collections and Collection Sets. Then I began thinking, before computers and amazing software like LR, how in the world did you guys organize and search for photos back in the days of film??? Just curious.

pretty much the same way i do now:

'keepers' in 3-ring type photo books sorted only by date and negs/contact sheets in a big box cataloged by date and subject.


Canon EOS M | G7 X | S90

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Mar 17, 2010 11:59 |  #11

SkipD wrote in post #9813070 (external link)
This is precisely what I would do, though the numbering of each frame was already done by Kodak.

yogestee wrote in post #9814040 (external link)
This works fine until you have more than one roll per shoot..

I seem to recall that one roll usually fit on an 8x10 contact sheet. Thus, there was one contact sheet per page of negatives in a 3-ring negative holder and - especially with the contact sheet done in the same order as the negative holder - it was easy to find a negative by visually scanning the contact sheets. The numbers on the negatives just confirmed which of several look-alike image negatives you had in the enlarger.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
birdfromboat
Goldmember
Avatar
1,839 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: somewhere in Oregon trying to keep this laptop dry
     
Mar 17, 2010 17:17 |  #12

I sometimes had the job of searching through negatives for reprints, especially team and school photos. We would keep them all seperated by original order and by photographer, but had to go through them visually on a light table looking for the "green team" or however the customer had described the image. We learned to read inverted print and see inverted colors. This was the eighties, early nineties. If someone asked me today to go find the negative of the young girl in the sweater with the rows of hearts on the front, or the boy in the rugby shirt with the white collar, I might still scream all these years later.


5D, 10D, G10, the required 100 macro, 24-70, 70-200 f/2.8, 300 f2.8)
Looking through a glass un-yun

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkarris
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Joined Jun 2009
     
Mar 17, 2010 19:37 |  #13

shoe boxes... ;)

LOL...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Mar 17, 2010 20:07 |  #14

Lets just say Kodak was about to give me a signature model of the Ektagraphic Trays.

I have no idea how many I had in my "Chrome" hayday. I think I am down to only a few that I have not sent off to be scanned yet. Each tray comes with a card that you fill out to record what is in each slot. So the box was labeled by subject, or assignment, or date depending on what was the best fit. Then the card would define what slot to go to to retrieve the image.

Also as mentioned above, I had a lot of the 3 ring neg holders and 3 ring slide holders.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 18, 2010 00:34 as a reply to  @ Mark1's post |  #15

I put the subject matter on a recipe card along with a number on the corner for the envelope number. I then would put the envelope number and the negative number on the back of each print. A few years before we went digital the lab that I used started to number the back of each of them which was a time saver. I then attached the card onto the envelope that the negatives came in and they went into a filing cabinet that I had special dividers built into so that I could fit alot in each drawer. I have 3 4 drawer filing cabinets full of negatives. I did have most of these cataloged into a spreadsheet that let me search for subject keywords. If one stayed on top of it, it was a good system.

For my 120 chromes I kept them in a binder in sheets. For the 35mm slides I kept in a box specially designed for them. I numbered each one and had most of them cataloged into a spreadsheet.

Pre-digital I shot way more medium format than I did 35mm.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,408 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
For the old school: How the heck did you organize photos in the film days?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2789 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.