VisualEchos wrote in post #9824341
Forgive me, but all of these are...terrible. Overcooked beyond recognition, busy beyond comprehension, blown out and fake bake. They're not even real HDR's. Sorry to be so hard on you, but you have to learn that what you've posted is not HDR. Want to see what a real HDR looks like?
| HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
If you'd like to learn how to do HDR the correct way, PM me and I'll be glad to help.
See here is the problem with HDR. As it is highly subjective, almost an art in the different ways you can represent it, the way these were done it is obvious it is not about trying to be realistic, they have a "painted with pastels" effect, and I think he succeeded in that regard.
I don't like all of them due to the backgrounds and composition, but to say "this is how you do HDR" is so full of it. Sorry, but c'mon, let go of it!
Sure your image is nicely done, and you may well be the guru of "real" HDR, I wouldn't know, but me personally I'd have his #4 on my wall over your one anyday. Why? Because I like the effect in that particular image, and the background suits the car nicely. It would make a great poster in the right spot IMHO.
And whilst your shot may be technically more "correct" in the land of realistic HDR, I have never been a fan of seeing nice cars in dingy areas, esp ones composed to give the effect of rust dripping onto the bonnet, and one of the first things I think when I look at it is I'm expecting someone is going to walk out that door and steal it . Some detail in the wheels wouldn't go astray either given it is a "real" HDR.......but that's just my opinion as a viewer of course.
And btw, I suck at HDR, but you already knew that I'm sure, because if I was good at it I would have agreed with you........no? 