Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 18 Mar 2010 (Thursday) 17:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

White Balance: set it and forget it?

 
360°
Senior Member
880 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Mar 18, 2010 17:26 |  #1

i just watched a photography dvd where the guy said "just set the camera to the cloud white balance and never worry about it again"

does this guy know what hes talking about?


List Of Gear:Canon 5D Mark III---1D Mark III---Canon 5D Mark II---Canon 85 F1.2--Canon 100mm f2.8 macro---Canon 24-70 F2.8--- Canon 70-200 F2.8 IS II---Canon 300mm F2.8---Bunch of pocketwizards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sorarse
Goldmember
Avatar
2,193 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Kent, UK
     
Mar 18, 2010 17:54 |  #2

That will only work if you are happy adjusting the WB of your photos in post (except those that were actually taken under cloudy conditions of course.)


At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett

http://www.scarecrowim​ages.com (external link)
Canon PowerShot G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Mar 18, 2010 18:16 |  #3

360° wrote in post #9824188 (external link)
i just watched a photography dvd where the guy said "just set the camera to the cloud white balance and never worry about it again"

does this guy know what hes talking about?


That's a pretty strange statement. I, personally, find that cloudy WB gives an image that looks unnatural, even if the scene was cloudy.

Unnatural in that the scene is flat because of the overcast but colors look sorta like there was sun. The scene didn't look like that to my eye and I don't want it looking like that in my image.

I've found AWB works pretty well in daylight, but I still wouldn't say "set to AWB and never worry about it again". AWB works for me in sunlight, overcast, deep shadow (like a forest), even for sunsets. But it sure doesn't work for tungsten lighting. And it usually isn't good for fluorescents, either.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Mar 18, 2010 18:58 as a reply to  @ number six's post |  #4

Here's what I'm talking about. This shot is of no particular merit, I was just trigger-happy. :p

I shot in raw, so I can recreate the WB settings in DPP.

Landscape style, AWB:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Landscape style, cloudy WB:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



It was an overcast day and looked very much like the first image. It wasn't anything like the second.

-js

"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Mar 18, 2010 21:44 |  #5

360° wrote in post #9824188 (external link)
i just watched a photography dvd where the guy said "just set the camera to the cloud white balance and never worry about it again"

does this guy know what hes talking about?

I suspect that the statement was taken somewhat out of context with other things such as always setting up a custom white balance or always shooting in RAW mode and adjusting color in post-processing or something similar.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
360°
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
880 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Mar 18, 2010 22:36 |  #6

he just said, set your wb to the cloud and you'll always get warm, inviting photos


List Of Gear:Canon 5D Mark III---1D Mark III---Canon 5D Mark II---Canon 85 F1.2--Canon 100mm f2.8 macro---Canon 24-70 F2.8--- Canon 70-200 F2.8 IS II---Canon 300mm F2.8---Bunch of pocketwizards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 18, 2010 22:53 |  #7

360° wrote in post #9825952 (external link)
he just said, set your wb to the cloud and you'll always get warm, inviting photos

Depends on the light. Cloudy is 6500k according to Lightroom. If the actual light was 5500k, using cloudy will warm it up. If the actual light was 3000k, you'll wind up with oompa loompas. And as shown above, it can make plants look sick. I just leave mine on auto and shoot raw in case I need to adjust it later.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Mar 19, 2010 06:42 |  #8

360° wrote in post #9825952 (external link)
he just said, set your wb to the cloud and you'll always get warm, inviting photos

Was it inferred that the suggestion is supposed to work in all different lighting conditions or just during ordinary daylight conditions?


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neilwood32
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,231 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
     
Mar 19, 2010 08:31 |  #9

The reason there are many different WB settings is that there is no one setting that is right for all occasions.

The person making that DVD was taking out of his..... hat


Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
Keep calm and carry a camera!
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyO
Member
Avatar
182 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2010
     
Mar 27, 2010 13:44 |  #10

Was it Joe McNally?


XSi with grip, Sigma 18-55 f/3.5-5.6, Sigma 28-70 f/2.8, Canon 100 f/2.8 macro, old but great Canon 300 f/4 L, 430 EX II, Quantaray 900W, broken tripods, White Lightnings, many accessories--former pro film, quit, now back into it for fun
Flickr (external link) - Picture Zealot blog (external link) (Old)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dragos ­ Jianu
Goldmember
1,768 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2005
     
Mar 27, 2010 16:06 |  #11

If you're a RAW shooter I don't think it makes any difference. I personally shoot mostly AWB, then tweak the color balance in ACR.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FatCat0
Senior Member
519 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
Location: New Jersey
     
Mar 28, 2010 00:32 |  #12

Dragos Jianu wrote in post #9882775 (external link)
If you're a RAW shooter I don't think it makes any difference. I personally shoot mostly AWB, then tweak the color balance in ACR.

This is what I do too. One less thing to worry about while shooting, which is one of the benefits of RAW.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Morlow
Goldmember
Avatar
2,824 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Yellowstone National Park
     
Mar 28, 2010 04:47 |  #13

I always leave my camera on AWB and adjust in post. I always like to adjust it anyway to give the shots the feel I am looking for.


Chris Knapp

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DunnoWhen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,748 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Mar 2006
Location: South Wales
     
Mar 28, 2010 05:14 |  #14

JeffreyO wrote in post #9882169 (external link)
Was it Joe McNally?

I think it's Bryan Peterson. I seem to recall him explaining this in his book "Understanding Exposure". He says he likes the warmer feeling it give his photographs.


My wisdom is learned from the experience of others.
...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BillyR
Member
216 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Mar 28, 2010 07:12 |  #15

I'm in the "Shoot in RAW and adjust in PP" camp. I've found that even with the WB set properly, i.e.; flourescent setting under flourescent lights, I still have to adjust the WB in the RAW editor. If it's set properly it doesn't have to be changed as much, but it always has to be changed. I suppose it's better if it doesn't have to be changed radically, i.e.; from 6500 to 3500, so I still try to remember to set it properly for the conditions so that it only has to be changed from, say, 6500 to 5500.


EOS 5D, 5D MK II, 20D
24-105L, 17-85 EF-S IS, 70-300 IS, 18-55, Sigma 12-24.
2-EX 580s, LC-5 Wireless Controller, ST-E2 Wireless Transmitter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,584 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
White Balance: set it and forget it?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2841 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.