Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 19 Mar 2010 (Friday) 12:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Fast shutter, little light?

 
trailguy
Senior Member
Avatar
449 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Home, college, career at Wilmington NC
     
Mar 19, 2010 12:37 |  #1

I'm retired from competition, and I do some photo work for area runners and triathletes, usually at abut 1/500 shutter speed.
A local group is sponsoring a marathon, March 21, and for some (foolish) reason, they will start at 6:30 AM. Almost all dark, so it almost kills any good photos, since I don't have big off-camera lighting.
I want(ed) to shoot each from about 15 ft as they cross a bridge, with beach background.
I'm thinging of setting the ISO at 800, AL SERVO, and let the shutter set itself, since a fast shutter won't work. I'm thinking that if I set spot focus on a runner and move with him it might give something usable. I use continous shooting if possible.
But I'm haven't tried, and I would appreciate an advice.
Canon 40D, Canon 17-55, 2.8 lens.
Thanks




Perfectionism is the highest form of self-abuse
"Best wide-angle lens? Two steps backward"
Ernst Hass 1952

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shootinsmiles
Member
Avatar
149 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 10
Joined Sep 2008
     
Mar 19, 2010 13:10 |  #2

There are lot of unknown variables here that make this difficult to answer. Start time is 6:30 but a marathon will take 2-4 hours; at what point where you wanting to take this picture? I googled sunrise and it's 7:17 for your area so you should start getting light at 6:30 and progressively more.

Since the light will be changing, I might try to set your camera to TV with an acceptable speed and adjust the ISO higher to get the proper exposure. You will likely need to go higher than 800. You could do the same thing with AV and set your aperture to 2.8 and adjust ISO to get an acceptable speed. Both of these will self adjust as the light changes so you don't have to worry about making those changes.

Do you have a speedlite flash? Depending on the situation you can set this up for fill light to give you the necessary boost in light without blowing out the background. (it sounds like the beach background is important to you in this photo) However, there are more variables here and would need adjustments as the light changes.

Good luck! It looks like you will have good weather for a race.


http://www.castenphoto​graphy.com (external link)
Canon 50D, Canon EFS 17-55 IS f/2.8, 70-200 IS f/2.8L, Canon 50 f/1.8, Tamron 18-200, Canon 580 EXII and 430 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BenJohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,811 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Mar 19, 2010 14:44 |  #3

Shoot wide open and set the ISO to get you the shutter speed you need. I'd go all the way up to ISO3200 (H on your 40D) if need be. Drop it down as the sun rises and your shutter speeds go up.


|Ben Johnson Photography (external link)|
|Gear List|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
trailguy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
449 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Home, college, career at Wilmington NC
     
Mar 19, 2010 18:29 as a reply to  @ BenJohnson's post |  #4

3200! I've never been there, but I can try it, get a good focus, and see what I get. Nothing to lose.
I usually use SPOT METER, AL SERO, and CONTINUOUS SHOOTING-LS.
I typically spot meter on the runner, and move with them (but indaylight).
There will be very little light, sun will not be up, so if I get anything worthwhile, I'll send it..




Perfectionism is the highest form of self-abuse
"Best wide-angle lens? Two steps backward"
Ernst Hass 1952

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Mar 19, 2010 18:37 as a reply to  @ trailguy's post |  #5

Get a friend or family member to go there tomorrow morning around the same time and see if you can get results you're happy with. Is there any chance of renting or borrowing a flash unit from someone?


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Biffbradford
Goldmember
Avatar
2,784 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 195
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Milwaukee
     
Mar 19, 2010 19:42 |  #6

I don't think you'll need ISO 3200. Shoot 1/250th if you have to. Go out the day before at that time and experiment. Even in your backyard, get a feel for it.


My pictures: John Wilke Photography (external link), Flikr (external link) , Facebook (external link), Fine Arts America (external link), Canon 1D MkII N, 1D MkIII, various Canon and Tokina lenses. :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Mar 19, 2010 20:15 |  #7

You may need ISO 1600 but that should be quite acceptable on the 40D. ISO 3200 might be a stretch but would surely get the image.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JoePhotoOnline
Senior Member
Avatar
915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Central Valley, California
     
Mar 20, 2010 13:39 |  #8

Pixel peepers hate 3200. People who actually print stuff up to about an 8x10 are just fine with it, myself included. I shot nightime HS football last year, and most shots were at 3200 on my 40D. Yes, ad 100% it looks a little scary, but actually print something and it becomes totally acceptable.

And of course, shoot RAW.

Believe me, a 3200 shot looks MUCH better than a 1600 shot pushed a stop in post.



Beginners talk about cameras, Pros talk about lenses, and Masters talk about light.
Feedback: 1 2 3 4 5 eBay UserID: 1969fordtruckman

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Treusi
Hatchling
Avatar
8 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK
     
May 05, 2010 10:41 as a reply to  @ JoePhotoOnline's post |  #9

I've learnt more from this thread than reading a dozen mags. Thanks guys.:D


Over the hill and picking up speed

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14870
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 05, 2010 10:45 |  #10

Do you have an external flash of any sort?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,911 posts
Likes: 140
Joined Jul 2007
Location: NE Ohio
     
May 05, 2010 10:58 |  #11

I'd not recommend Av and spot metering for this since you may get some really odd results as a) unis differ greatly and b) light is going to be changing so rapidly. I agree with the advice above about Tv (or probably M imo). I'd also strongly suggest CWA or even evaluative metering. If you even have a hot shoe flash, you can shoot runners at MUCH slower speeds. Use second curtain sync and don't be afraid to shoot 1/100 (or slower) and pull in some nice ambient light with the sunrise over the beach while getting some nice sense of motion as well. Cylcing shooters routinely shoot at 1/125 using this method with great results. Obviously, marathoners are much slower than cyclists so you should have no problems. Use the flash to stop action and expose the subject through ISO and aperture accordingly. That's how I'd do it at least.


Scott Evans Photography (external link)
SportsShooterProfile (external link) l MaxPreps Profile (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MT ­ Stringer
Goldmember
Avatar
4,652 posts
Likes: 6
Joined May 2006
Location: Channelview, Tx
     
May 05, 2010 11:17 |  #12

The marathon was a month and a half ago. I wonder how his pics turned out.


MaxPreps Profile (external link)

My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14870
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 05, 2010 11:22 |  #13

MT Stringer wrote in post #10126112 (external link)
The marathon was a month and a half ago. I wonder how his pics turned out.

Crap, the thread popped up in the new posts, I totally whiffed on the date.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,911 posts
Likes: 140
Joined Jul 2007
Location: NE Ohio
     
May 05, 2010 11:27 |  #14

gonzogolf wrote in post #10126133 (external link)
Crap, the thread popped up in the new posts, I totally whiffed on the date.

me too but hopefully some of my comments might help for a future event (or cause someone to think I'm nuts, either way...)


Scott Evans Photography (external link)
SportsShooterProfile (external link) l MaxPreps Profile (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MT ­ Stringer
Goldmember
Avatar
4,652 posts
Likes: 6
Joined May 2006
Location: Channelview, Tx
     
May 05, 2010 15:13 |  #15

gonzogolf wrote in post #10126133 (external link)
Crap, the thread popped up in the new posts, I totally whiffed on the date.

No problem for me. I read through the entire thread. You never know when something good will be buried in a thread like this.


MaxPreps Profile (external link)

My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,777 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Fast shutter, little light?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1228 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.