Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 20 Mar 2010 (Saturday) 09:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I've become a photo snob! yikes!

 
robscomputer
Senior Member
Avatar
429 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Union City, CA
     
Mar 22, 2010 11:47 |  #16

TermV wrote in post #9846799 (external link)
...

Your "photo snobbery" is simply you starting to look at photographs with a photographer's eye...

++

After you see what is good photos, you get a better understanding at what is wrong with bad photos. I get the same way, I've seen some photos of my friends which are how do you say, need improvement. :)


Amateur photographer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snyderman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,084 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Wadsworth, Ohio
     
Mar 22, 2010 12:01 |  #17

Understand where you're coming from and it works both ways. I shoot basketball and football for my local high school. Attended the fall sports (football) night at the HS. The woman who shot cross-country and soccer put together a fall sports slide show for the audience. Imagine my surprise when all my football shots showed up on HER slide show presentation?!!! I always get the last laugh when 1 of 10 soccer shots were actually on par with any of my football shots!

Secondly, there were 3 dads who shot football. Several senior parents put together picture books for their football playing sons. Imagine my surprise when the books were 3/4 MY shots again!

Guess it just comes with the territory. Credit and recognition would be nice sometimes, though! I'm sure you'll feel the same way when the finished product is nearly all your shots as well!

dave


Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Mar 22, 2010 15:30 |  #18

snyderman wrote in post #9847532 (external link)
Credit and recognition would be nice sometimes, though!

And sometimes not nice.

Around six years ago I went on a day's motorcycle ride with some friends. Took my N*k*n POS (err, P&S) and got a few snapshot type pics at the request of one of the riders. She wanted pics for the company employees' newsletter.

I didn't know until I put the pics on my computer that the AF had failed (permanently) and all the shots were oof. Recognizable, but nothing I would ever display or publish.

My friend was disappointed and asked if she could have them anyway - the images in the publication were going to be pretty small anyway.

I reluctantly said yes, with one condition:

"Nobody must EVER know who took these!"

:confused:


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timbop
Goldmember
Avatar
2,980 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 18
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
     
Mar 22, 2010 16:48 |  #19

TermV wrote in post #9846799 (external link)
....
Your "photo snobbery" is simply you starting to look at photographs with a photographer's eye.

mbellot wrote in post #9847040 (external link)
Really? I've taken hundreds (more likely thousands) of pics of my kids that I think are total crap. Maybe I'm too critical.

Exactly. As with any craft, the more you study it the more you learn what is good and what is not. Novices often just don't know any better, whther it is wine tasting or photography.

I personally have a different kind of snobbery, which is in fact equipment related. I had a manual everything SLR in the 80's and loved it very much, but after I graduated college in 1990 and had no access to a darkroom I gave it up and went to a film P&S. The film P&S was fine, but I found that digital P&S's just had too many compromises on speed and utility. From my SLR dyas I knew how to prefocus and time action shots, but with the delay of a digital P&S I was at a loss. I ended up getting a DSLR in 2005 because I was sooooo frustrated with what my P&S couldn't do.

Just yesterday we were at a small zoo, and most everyone else had P&S's that could not focus on the animals behind fences, while my 7d had no trouble at all. I didn't care that I had to carry 10lbs of gear, because I got the shots I wanted and am happy with them. For me it was worth it even though my images from there will never ever be published - I enjoyed the afternoon without frustration and am satisfied that I did a good job (IMHO).


Current: 5DM3, 6D, 8mm fish, 24-105/4IS, 35/2IS, 70-200/2.8IS, 85/1.8, 100-400/IS v1, lensbaby composer with edge 80, 580's and AB800's
Formerly: 80D, 7D, 300D, 5D, 5DM2, 20D, 50D, 1DM2, 17-55IS, 24-70/2.8, 28-135IS, 40/2.8, 50/1.8, 50/1.4, 70-200/4IS, 70-300IS, 70-200/2.8, 100 macro, 400/5.6, tammy 17-50 and 28-75, sigma 50 macro & 100-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mbellot
"My dog ate my title"
Avatar
3,365 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Jul 2005
Location: The Miami of Canada - Chicago!
     
Mar 22, 2010 18:32 |  #20

timbop wrote in post #9849475 (external link)
Exactly. As with any craft, the more you study it the more you learn what is good and what is not.

Unfortunately your logic falls apart with politics. ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mom2AnH
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,155 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Mar 22, 2010 19:08 |  #21

This has been a really insightful thread.

and now ... I have a question ... I have a quite adorable picture of my younger son, taken yesterday. First time on roller skates. But, it's BLURRY as all get out and I have no idea how to fix it (if it can even be fixed).

Anyone up for the challenge?


Jenn
C&C always appreciated
Canon Rebel XS w/ 18-55mm IS, 75-300mm, and the nifty-fifty

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
theextremist04
Goldmember
Avatar
1,224 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Kansas City
     
Mar 22, 2010 19:34 |  #22

Is he moving? If yes, it's probably motion blur. You need to increase the shutter speed, whether it's with ISO or better light or flash.


-Michael
Gear - Flickr (external link) - Website (external link) - Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mom2AnH
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,155 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Mar 22, 2010 19:38 |  #23

theextremist04 wrote in post #9850564 (external link)
Is he moving? If yes, it's probably motion blur. You need to increase the shutter speed, whether it's with ISO or better light or flash.

actually nope... he was standing still (LOL ... he was scared to death to move but did good with standing still by himself! hehe)

I don't think my flash fired at all .... so thats probably the problem ..... next on my "wish list" a good flash! :)


Jenn
C&C always appreciated
Canon Rebel XS w/ 18-55mm IS, 75-300mm, and the nifty-fifty

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
20droger
Cream of the Crop
14,685 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 22, 2010 19:59 as a reply to  @ mom2AnH's post |  #24

I would say the picture is what it is, blurry. There's not much that can be done after the fact, regardless of the cause of the blur.

That does not, of course, make it less adorable in your eyes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timbop
Goldmember
Avatar
2,980 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 18
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
     
Mar 22, 2010 20:12 |  #25

post the pic and we'll make some suggestions. My guess is either motion blur due to a slow shutter speed or missed focus


Current: 5DM3, 6D, 8mm fish, 24-105/4IS, 35/2IS, 70-200/2.8IS, 85/1.8, 100-400/IS v1, lensbaby composer with edge 80, 580's and AB800's
Formerly: 80D, 7D, 300D, 5D, 5DM2, 20D, 50D, 1DM2, 17-55IS, 24-70/2.8, 28-135IS, 40/2.8, 50/1.8, 50/1.4, 70-200/4IS, 70-300IS, 70-200/2.8, 100 macro, 400/5.6, tammy 17-50 and 28-75, sigma 50 macro & 100-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,986 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
I've become a photo snob! yikes!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2789 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.