Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 21 Mar 2010 (Sunday) 11:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

can someone tell me i'm right?

 
ryan-oceros
Member
85 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2010
     
Mar 21, 2010 11:47 |  #1

ok so last night i was shooting with the nifty 250 at my sisters prom. (only lens' i have at the moment are the 18-55 and 55-250...) it was a low light situation and was shooting from about 30-40ft away at grand march so my flash was worthless. a couple of the pics of the grand march came out blurry and i told my dad that the pics would have come out better if i had a better lens. to which he replies "you bought this expensive camera and still can't take decent pictures with it? you should have just put it on automatic and let the camera do the thinking for you" we go back and forth a bit i tell him i was shooting on aperature priority mode with the aperature wide open and ISO on 3200 (canon T1i). basically by the end of the conversation he told me to take my camera back because if i can't take the pics i want with the lens' i have then i don't know what i'm doing.

anyone care to help me out on this one?


| A Gripped T1i. A few lenses. And a tripod. Speedlite |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScPhotoMom
Goldmember
Avatar
2,312 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Jan 2009
Location: South Carolina
     
Mar 21, 2010 11:50 |  #2

I find it to be the lens and the operator. Not the camera

Aperture dictates how much light you can let in and more lights means less blur in low light situations. The camera doesn't control the aperture. The lens does


My Flickr (external link) - My Gear -My facebook (external link)
Canon 7d Mark II - Canon 40D - Canon 580ex - Canon 28-135mm(3.5) - Canon EF 17-55mm(2.8) - Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III - Canon 85mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
greekcs
Member
56 posts
Joined May 2008
     
Mar 21, 2010 11:52 |  #3

The lens is too slow.


5D Mark IV | 24-70 2.8L II | 16-40 4L | 50 1.8II | 550EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cskorik
Senior Member
845 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Mar 21, 2010 11:53 |  #4

The lens was inappropriate for the situation. Stick to a normal, wide-aperture lens for that kind of situation. You'd take some beautiful pics with the $80 50mm f/1.8...


My portfolio (external link)!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Mar 21, 2010 11:54 |  #5

That really depends. What shutter speeds were you getting at those settings?
If you were all maxed out then you've certainly reached the limits of what your current gear can do. Of course a faster lens would have helped in that it would have given you faster shutter speeds.

Post up some samples with EXIF intact. We would be able to tell you more.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Mar 21, 2010 11:55 |  #6

Wide open, no flash, and 3200 iso - There's nothing more you could have done with what you had.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Mar 21, 2010 11:56 |  #7

obnoxiousmom wrote in post #9840933 (external link)
I find it to be the lens and the operator. Not the camera

Aperture dictates how much light you can let in and more lights means less blur in low light situations. The camera doesn't control the aperture. The lens does

Operator error? How so. If he was maxed out, then there's nothing else he could have done. If you are saying he was underprepared for the situation, then yes, I would agree with you.

More light means faster shutter speed, which will aid in stopping subject motion and effects of hand shake.

The camera does control the aperture.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryan-oceros
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
85 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2010
     
Mar 21, 2010 11:58 |  #8

cskorik wrote in post #9840950 (external link)
The lens was inappropriate for the situation. Stick to a normal, wide-aperture lens for that kind of situation. You'd take some beautiful pics with the $80 50mm f/1.8...

i tried to get ahold of one of these locally. i live in montana so there is only one photog store in town and they sold out of them before they even got them in stock. i'll post pics and let you guys tell me.


| A Gripped T1i. A few lenses. And a tripod. Speedlite |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sharpmaxell
Senior Member
Avatar
857 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 24
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Lexington, KY
     
Mar 21, 2010 12:00 |  #9

cskorik wrote in post #9840950 (external link)
You'd take some beautiful pics with the $80 50mm f/1.8...

x2. A fast prime would be great in this situation. I only use my 55-250 outside with plenty of light.


Gripped 50D | ∑ 17-70 f2.8-4 OS HSM | 55-250 f4-5.6 IS | 50 f1.8 mk I | 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sharpmaxell
Senior Member
Avatar
857 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 24
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Lexington, KY
     
Mar 21, 2010 12:02 |  #10

ryan-oceros wrote in post #9840978 (external link)
i tried to get ahold of one of these locally. i live in montana so there is only one photog store in town and they sold out of them before they even got them in stock. i'll post pics and let you guys tell me.

Order it off b&h for right at $100


Gripped 50D | ∑ 17-70 f2.8-4 OS HSM | 55-250 f4-5.6 IS | 50 f1.8 mk I | 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Mar 21, 2010 12:04 |  #11

cskorik wrote in post #9840950 (external link)
The lens was inappropriate for the situation. Stick to a normal, wide-aperture lens for that kind of situation. You'd take some beautiful pics with the $80 50mm f/1.8...

Wait, so he was 40ft away and you are suggesting that a 50 1.8 is the more appropriate lens? :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bjyoder
Goldmember
Avatar
1,664 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Central Ohio
     
Mar 21, 2010 12:07 |  #12

I would have been using the flash. At about 40', you'd most likely have an add-on flash pointed straight ahead, so using the onboard flash wouldn't have detracted from the quality.

In that specific situation (without playing the game of "you could have bought so and so if you knew you were going to be there), that is the only other thing (apparently) you could do.


Ben

500px (external link) | Website (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Erik_L
Goldmember
3,160 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Minnesota
     
Mar 21, 2010 12:12 |  #13

not sure how effective even a 580EXII is at 40 feet... but I suppose at ISO 1600 or so,it would have been better than nothing.

Your dad sounds like a real pleasure to be around :). Tell him to pony up the dough for a 70-200 f/2.8 and you'll get the shots he expects.


Canon EOS 1D III
Manfrotto 190X Pro B w/324RC2 "Action Head" | Canon 580EX II
Sigma 20 f/1.8 | Canon 35 f/1.4 L | Sigma 50 f/1.4 | Sigma 85 f/1.4 | Canon 135 f/2 L
Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tongsy
Member
120 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Mar 21, 2010 12:15 |  #14

Sounds like your dad is a jerk.


Feedback 1
Feedback 2
Feedback 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Mar 21, 2010 12:18 |  #15

tongsy wrote in post #9841076 (external link)
Sounds like your dad is a jerk.

Sounds like his dad knows nothing about photography.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,858 views & 0 likes for this thread, 24 members have posted to it.
can someone tell me i'm right?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1157 guests, 188 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.